Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 33,188
Confed cup he was useless(USA beat them, USA are good but not that good, its a rubbish cup and they got beaten by the first half decent team, Ramires was decent in the confed cup for comparison, also utterly rubbish at the moment), and he was largely poo for most of his world cup games, had one pretty damn good game, but just as you can get an assist when playing badly, you can get sent off for entirely nothing at all. He also wasn't the TOP assist maker, he was joint top assist maker, with 4 other players, with 3 assists.
Skippi, I don't mind that you're trying to sign a top striker, theres nothing wrong with that, but Chelsea knew they could get Torres, Liverpool knew they could get Carroll. Chelsea/Liverpool didn't run around trying to sign every striker available, clearly they could both afford anyone that Spurs had gone for.
The main issue is, they bid on just about everyone in the last day, its just amateur hour stuff from Harry. He should have identified a target MONTHS ago and tapped him up just like he usually does(and everyone else) and found the right target. He's been complaining for months, he's been ignoring Pav for 2 years, he's choosing to play Crouch, he's complaining about strikers yet he didn't have a no.1 target ready to go from Jan 1st?
Aguero isn't going to leave a club he loves, for a club that with 25minutes to go puts in a big bid, who haven't convinced him of their long term ambition. Chelsea don't need to convince Torres of their ambition, sorry but Spurs, struggling along behind a rubbish Chelsea to try and stay in the champs league really really do. A last minute bid for a top player from anything but an established top 4 club would almost never happen, Spurs really did look daft bidding like that.
had they gone to Athletico early in the month, gotten permission and shared their plan for a 80k seater stadium, becoming a top 4 team and pushing on for the title, I can see plenty of decent strikers being persuaded to go to Spurs. They way Harry did it, no, not least because for instance by going after Forlan, he's going to feel like the 28th choice and all they could get, look at Spurs, realise that champs league next year is unlikely, winning the league isn't likely and hold out for a move to a top 4 club in summer.
Skippi, I don't mind that you're trying to sign a top striker, theres nothing wrong with that, but Chelsea knew they could get Torres, Liverpool knew they could get Carroll. Chelsea/Liverpool didn't run around trying to sign every striker available, clearly they could both afford anyone that Spurs had gone for.
The main issue is, they bid on just about everyone in the last day, its just amateur hour stuff from Harry. He should have identified a target MONTHS ago and tapped him up just like he usually does(and everyone else) and found the right target. He's been complaining for months, he's been ignoring Pav for 2 years, he's choosing to play Crouch, he's complaining about strikers yet he didn't have a no.1 target ready to go from Jan 1st?
Aguero isn't going to leave a club he loves, for a club that with 25minutes to go puts in a big bid, who haven't convinced him of their long term ambition. Chelsea don't need to convince Torres of their ambition, sorry but Spurs, struggling along behind a rubbish Chelsea to try and stay in the champs league really really do. A last minute bid for a top player from anything but an established top 4 club would almost never happen, Spurs really did look daft bidding like that.
had they gone to Athletico early in the month, gotten permission and shared their plan for a 80k seater stadium, becoming a top 4 team and pushing on for the title, I can see plenty of decent strikers being persuaded to go to Spurs. They way Harry did it, no, not least because for instance by going after Forlan, he's going to feel like the 28th choice and all they could get, look at Spurs, realise that champs league next year is unlikely, winning the league isn't likely and hold out for a move to a top 4 club in summer.
Last edited: