Both Carrick and Fletcher have been pretty useless for a while. Both have been good players for us at times but for me they're both playing like they're taking it for granted. Fletcher perhaps is more to do with the long time out injured but Carrick in particular does not look like he has the desire to improve.
Anyone, and I really do mean anyone, can have a good game. That isn't indicative of if a player is good. Fletcher has scored goals against Chelsea IIRC, that doesn't make him a goal scoring machine, he's also played fantastically well on occasion, I can't name many players who haven't.
Thing is, when a team is doing well FAR too many fans start thinking that players in said team are much better than they really are.
Anderson is one of those, Cleverley just oozes class when he plays, I've said before that guys like Fabregas, Xavi, Iniesta, Wilshire, they will get the ball, facing their own goal, under pressure, but know the right way to turn, often as the pass comes into them, away from danger and rather than pass backwards and create more pressure for the team one great turn out of danger lets them get forward.
Anderson didn't look good to me in those first 4-5 games Utd looked unbeatable, Cleverley did. Generally you can tell who the "real" quality player was in a team that is playing well when the team changes. Anderson stayed, Cleverley got injured, the team got worse. Utd drop Anderson, they rarely if ever look worse.
Drop Fabregas, Arsenal were half the team, drop Song, the team didn't notice.
Honestly, the EPL has just been getting worse and Arsenal/Utd at their best, before after 2000, basically before 2004ish, Utd/Arsenal couldn't have won crap with the midfields they have now, but the league today, you can scrape by with a few bad players. The difference is for me Chelsea spent their money stupidly badly, with a few exceptional players, and a few dudes. City have also bought a few massively overpriced players in Milner and Barry, but their "crap" buys are significantly better than Chelsea crap buys and their striker buying well, puts Chelsea to shame. In Chelsea's good years, Mutu, Drogba, Crespo, and all the players who didn't work. If Chelsea had bought 3 guys in the calibre of Aguero, Dzeko, Tevez/Balotelli they'd have won a lot more than they did.
That difference in quality between the team Chelsea put together, which always struggled for depth and overspent on the wrong players time and time again, vs the quality City have put together is insane.
Without City and the team they have Utd might have won the league with Anderson/Fletcher, with City around there isn't a chance in hell.
They need a starting DM and a backup DM, and they need someone good enough to start at AMC but either old enough, or young enough/not a huge name that Cleverley will be allowed to play a very decent number of games.