Who contradicts themselves?
As for the rest of your rubbish. Players can leave under-contract, that's not an issue providing it's with their clubs consent. Players don't have the right to leave while they're under contract though and certainly don't have the right to not play until they're sold though. As Tim Payton says, Fabregas' actions put you in a terrible bargaining position ultimately ended up with you receiving a fee that I don't believe for one minute Wenger would have accepted had Fabregas behaved properly. And what does Tim Payton have do to with anything - you claimed that you've not seen any Arsenal supporter say the things I mentioned in my first post. I know it's hard given the volume of crap you come out with but at least keep up with your own posts.
Behaved properly? he could have forced his way out 2-3 years before, he didn't he felt he owed it to Arsenal to sign a contract, give Wenger a last chance and get Arsenal the fee when he leaves.
Did Fabregas only wanting to go to Barca make us weak in negotiating, sure, and, again he could have left for nothing had he wanted to be an arse about it.
Its quite simple, I see Fabregas leaving as giving us 3 more years than almost anyone else as good as him should have bothered with, got 30mil more than the club deserved, put up with Wenger's BS longer than most, and left without a bad thing to say. Nasri, was an upstart, wasn't particularly good, was lazy, and I didn't care that he left, he's since seemingly been a bit of a **** but I don't really blame him as most Arsenal fans were ****'s to him anyway.
Henry, Vieira, Fabregas and RVP were all worth more than they left for, were all made promises by Wenger "stay one more year, we'll improve, invest and compete for something", then left for less than they were worth.
Henry was widely rumoured to want out, Wenger begged him to stay another year, signed a 4 year contract, had a terrible season(actually great when fit), and left. However, he left for a fee we wouldn't have got had he not signed a new contract, he only had a year left, and we had offers of 30mil, he could have gone on a free, but stayed another year, signed a contract and we got 20mil instead of nothing.
Henry also ONLY wanted to go to Barcelona(despite not having played their like Cesc had), he had a reduced fee, and no one made up bs stories about his behaviour for hits on their websites.
Edit: I see Benitez has had his say on DM's posts too.
I don't post stats, the person who came in and said Theo has the best chance conversion and ran was posting a stat and nothing else. I would have posted that and asked, what are they deeming a chance, and why would you expect a striker who shoots and frequently scores from many different places like RVP, to a player who takes 90% of his shots in 1 on 1's have similar chance conversion.
Maybe I would also have compared their history, like RVP had a 1 in 5.8 shots to goal ratio last year, and Walcott was a 1 in 9.x, and that depending on who you play and when the stats can change quite a bit in one weekend, or that RVP has scored double what Walcott has, by way of being a better player and being more capable of scoring in different situations. Walcott is so limited that he takes.
But again, I guess I'm posting stats, with no other discussion, no interpretation, stat and run, thats me.... obviously.