It was and that would have been helpfulIf that was aimed @Kelt then I suspect he missed the /s off his post...
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/tongue.gif)
It was and that would have been helpfulIf that was aimed @Kelt then I suspect he missed the /s off his post...
Eh?
Would you say the same if someone was planning on blowing a bus up or a mass shooting?
Eh?
Would you say the same if someone was planning on blowing a bus up or a mass shooting?
It looks like they have a warrant to search the houses. So a judge would have had to assess the evidence presented to them and agree that there was more than just a suspicion with no real reason.
No-one is removing their right to protest. They are free to do so. What they are not free to do is vandalise property and interfere with infrastructure in a way that causes other people significant impact.I get what you guys are saying, but the plan here would likely be spraying that organic paint stuff they make and sitting down next to something in protest. There are judges that will sign on things in other countries where they have control as well, I imagine it's easy to find one.
Don't know, as annoying as they are, I still sort of think it's a bit controlling, arresting them like this. Removing the right protest, human rights are the next target to be removed. All a bit 1984.
No-one is removing their right to protest. They are free to do so. What they are not free to do is vandalise property and interfere with infrastructure in a way that causes other people significant impact.