Legal aid should not fund asylum legal action.

[KillBoY_UK]

Not if I can prove it.

The only people triggered are the ones fervorously spouting the same anti-immigrant anti non-white nonsense given half the opportunity.

You putting everything into the same pot. legal immigration/illegal immigration/economic migrates/asylum seekers etc

So how would you handle each? or some anyone any times should be able to travel anywhere with zero restrictions?

 

[The Running Man]

Not if I can prove it.

The only people triggered are the ones fervorously spouting the same anti-immigrant anti non-white nonsense given half the opportunity.

I think you'd struggle , you haven't proven any points yet in this thread...

Just thrown out personal insults and accusations.

 

[Janesy B]

You putting everything into the same pot. legal immigration/illegal immigration/economic migrates/asylum seekers etc

So how would you handle each? or some anyone any times should be able to travel anywhere with zero restrictions?

I'm not really, it's other people doing that. For example what has this got to do with immigrants or people claiming asylum?

I mean I'm not going to mention ethnicity but this could be one reason for coronavirus spreading in manchester

As I keep posting, people should be getting mad at the government and the home office for being utterly useless. For filling up detention centres where people have proven to be radicalised or annoying locals by filling up empty hotels. Either grant them asylum or put them on repatriation flights. We don't do enough to check for possible criminality, be that from people who can migrate here legally or illegally. And that's checking crime databases and records, not profiling by race or nationality.

The Brexit crew are unhappy the boasts of being able to control our own borders have been proved to be as flimsy as any other argument for Brexit.

I think you'd struggle , you haven't proven any points yet in this thread...

Just thrown out personal insults and accusations.

I have though, otherwise report my posts and let the mods do their job.

 

[The Running Man]

I'm not really, it's other people doing that. For example what has this got to do with immigrants or people claiming asylum?



As I keep posting, people should be getting mad at the government and the home office for being utterly useless. For filling up detention centres where people have proven to be radicalised or annoying locals by filling up empty hotels. Either grant them asylum or put them on repatriation flights. We don't do enough to check for possible criminality, be that from people who can migrate here legally or illegally. And that's checking crime databases and records, not profiling by race or nationality.

The Brexit crew are unhappy the boasts of being able to control our own borders have been proved to be as flimsy as any other argument for Brexit.



I have though, otherwise report my posts and let the mods do their job.

Will do!

 

[Mrwong]

The only negative impact it has is on the racists and the poor.

Canada is a promoter of immigration and they are a much more prosperous country than us within a few decades without the horrible history.

All you will ever see is negatives. You have already made a stake in the ground and drawn a line.

So you have agreed that immigration impacts the poor, would it be logical to resolve the poor native problem and once that has been fix open the immigration doors for skilled people.

 

[Psycho Sonny]

So you have agreed that immigration impacts the poor, would it be logical to resolve the poor native problem and once that has been fix open the immigration doors for skilled people.

You can't solve the poor native problem.

You can't force people to eat nutritional food, stop drinking and smoking so their children develop well.

You cannot then force them to feed their children good food so their brains develop with age.

You also cannot force people to work hard or do well in school.

They need to want to do these things.

Rather than spending £100 a week on drink and fags they should have spent it on decent food. Rather than gambling, ******* away money in pubs they should have invested in a home in a half decent area.

The only way to solve the problem of the poor is have a benefit system that promotes working.

I believe in Canada all you get is 6 months and after that you are cut off and you need to have paid into the system first to be entitled to that.

There are exceptions of course for veterans and disabilities.

What they don't do is promote a system where its okay to be a single mother to multiple children. Sometimes as many as a football team and rake in £50k a year in benefits.

It's not the immigrants that's the problem is the British people themselves and their mentality when it comes to the poor.

If anything I'd rather have 1 hard working migrant for 100 lazy British.

In Canada all the low paid native Canadians are complaining also. But they are also the last person you will see to pick up a shovel and earn it. They are complaining all the immigration is pushing prices up. People are taking their jobs.

Entitled generation.

I'm willing to bet a lot of people who harbour I'll intent towards immigrants are people that aren't that well off financially, either that or just simply racist.

 

[Dis86]

Complains about people generalising by...generalising.

 

[FoxEye]

Save lives and the economy or hide the truth?

It's sodding ridiculous that "fear of racial tension" would override concerns over safety during a pandemic.

Unless (and I suspect not) they've run the numbers which showed deaths would be higher in lockdown than without lockdown.

Covid will kill, and unless "racial tension" in Oldham is routinely ending in life-altering injury and death, then FFS deal with the Covid and not people's hurt feelings.

And how fair is it, if one section of the populace - perhaps those who believe they are somehow immune - is allowed to infect others who don't share that belief... because they will be using the same public facilities and shops as everyone else.

Will cross Oldham off my staycation list in any case.

 

[FoxEye]

Your forefathers massacred tens of millions of innocent people in India and stole £45 trillion in the process.

You must be very proud of them. Killing all those that aren't part of the master race.

Honestly tho, whose forefathers didn't do something similar...

It was all the rage back then.

Likely been told its nice here and better.

Little do they know its full of racists with no compassion.

We get it you don't like Muslims.

Let's just hope that you never need to use the NHS half the folk working there are foreigners and non whites.

On a more serious note, my compassion is for those who share the same basic values. Basic respect for people and property, the rule of law, freedom of expression and religion.. I'm not going to list them all.

I have very little compassion for those whose values are diametrically opposed to my own. Perhaps none.

The UK does seem to have a growing number of people who live here, but hold the UK and its values in utter contempt. Refusing to integrate and refusing to live by the basic standards we expect (from everyone).

Let's face it, those people aren't going to be doctors and nurses. Neither am I saying they couldn't be white, or natives. On that note, we have more than enough home-grown cretins and should really avoid importing more of those from other countries. Especially if they hate us, or just want free money. Screw those guys.

 

[Mrwong]

You can't solve the poor native problem.

You can't force people to eat nutritional food, stop drinking and smoking so their children develop well.

You cannot then force them to feed their children good food so their brains develop with age.

You also cannot force people to work hard or do well in school.

They need to want to do these things.

Rather than spending £100 a week on drink and fags they should have spent it on decent food. Rather than gambling, ******* away money in pubs they should have invested in a home in a half decent area.

The only way to solve the problem of the poor is have a benefit system that promotes working.

I believe in Canada all you get is 6 months and after that you are cut off and you need to have paid into the system first to be entitled to that.

There are exceptions of course for veterans and disabilities.

What they don't do is promote a system where its okay to be a single mother to multiple children. Sometimes as many as a football team and rake in £50k a year in benefits.

It's not the immigrants that's the problem is the British people themselves and their mentality when it comes to the poor.

If anything I'd rather have 1 hard working migrant for 100 lazy British.

In Canada all the low paid native Canadians are complaining also. But they are also the last person you will see to pick up a shovel and earn it. They are complaining all the immigration is pushing prices up. People are taking their jobs.

Entitled generation.

I'm willing to bet a lot of people who harbour I'll intent towards immigrants are people that aren't that well off financially, either that or just simply racist.

If you live in a house your family have more rights than a visitor. The same goes for the UK, the natives have more rights than the visitors( immigrants).
If the natives wish to live of the state then be it, but immigrants and asylum seekers should not full stop.
Can't you see the difference between natives and those that have no connection to the UK.

Ok I guess you agree in not giving asylums and immigrants any support no money from the state no homes etc... I 100 %agree 1gen migrants should not be entitled to anything apart from a pension if they paid towards it.

 

[deuse]

A few thousand views won't pay for a stay in a musty old hotel.

They couldn't afford to stay in prison, so do we just shoot them. (I know what your answer would be)

Irony.

Who is going to pay for that, surely an empty hotel is more cost effective than spending millions on something that would be worse?

Britain First knew where they were.

They should be mad at government mismanagement not a few brown people coming over in boats.

What an apologist.

I knew they was there before as I have many friends in Bromsgrove(who told me) who can't afford to spend the weekend there let alone a full year.

I hope they are truly vetted before they can walk our streets.

 

[deuse]

They have no issues with letting people in it seems and they see immigration as key to their countries future.

They have a decent system in place. The UK does not thanks to the EU.

Basically any criminal can come here from any other eu country.

Canada has a brilliant system in place and it's a much nicer place to be than here as a result.

There is no this is my land mentality. Or go back to where you came from like it is here.

It's also 100 times better than America yet has all the good things that America has with very little of the bad.

Have you ever lived in Canada?

 

[Psycho Sonny]

If you live in a house your family have more rights than a visitor. The same goes for the UK, the natives have more rights than the visitors( immigrants).
If the natives wish to live of the state then be it, but immigrants and asylum seekers should not full stop.
Can't you see the difference between natives and those that have no connection to the UK.

Ok I guess you agree in not giving asylums and immigrants any support no money from the state no homes etc... I 100 %agree 1gen migrants should not be entitled to anything apart from a pension if they paid towards it.

I have nothing more to say to you.

I stopped listening when you said the Indians deserved to be killed, raped, massacred, starved and worked to death. And they deserve it to be done again.

Your either a troll or a moron or possibly both.

 

[KillBoY_UK]

I have nothing more to say to you.

I stopped listening when you said the Indians deserved to be killed, raped, massacred, starved and worked to death. And they deserve it to be done again.

Your either a troll or a moron or possibly both.

Where did he say that ? If he did he be banned for sure

 

[Psycho Sonny]

Those problems are there own doing not the British.
You can't continue to blame another countries for problems after a long period big time.

They had sufficient time to resolve them and havent.

Those countries need to accept they are the cause and only they can have a solution. If they can't they they need to be invaded again.

The British had gone through the same when they were invaded. You don't see them crying and blaming the Romans etc do you.

If those countries have problems they have not resolved then it is their own making.

There you go.

I was referring to when the British were in power.

They massacred tens of millions through lots of different processes.

Like forced migration. Religious segregation. Stealing all the food for themselves causing a famine which killed circa 5 million. Stealing all the wealth which amounted to £45 trillion.

There was also many many mass shootings of innocent civilians. I've seen the bullet holes myself and the Wells people jumped into trying to flee the tirade of British bullets. I'm talking unarmed men, women and children and this wasn't hundreds of years ago either just in the last century.

Britain ruined the country, killed anyone who got in their way or peacefully protested, stole everything they could and left them with nothing.

He says it was their own doing. They forced the British to shoot them whilst they were standing unarmed near a religious place of worship the golden temple. They were the cause they are his words.

Sufficient time to resolve the mess the British left behind. Of course if some idiot decides to create a border but decides to only do half of it. People are going to fight over the other half. Neither side want to give up the land so what resolution does he think is acceptable?

Does he also believe that when the Sikhs demanded their own land khalistan another sikh genocide happened. Should the Indian government granted them their own land like the British did with the muslims? Because their response was to go in and just kill them all.

Do you think the British government today would be so willing to give say a part of England to them so they can officially have their own country and home? After all they did kill tens of millions and stole everything they had. How about handing over £45 trillion worth of England to them? Then see how the English react?

There would be riots in the streets. More people massacred. To say that they should sort it out is just retarded. If he thinks it's as simple as that then his brain obviously doesn't understand complex situations.

 

[Ayahuasca]

Complains about people generalising by...generalising.

The waffle has achieved next level full spectrum enlightenment.

I wonder how many times £45 trillion can be mentioned ayyylmao.

 

[CosmicClown]

Likely been told its nice here and better.

Little do they know its full of racists with no compassion.

I have nothing more to say to you.

I stopped listening when you said the Indians deserved to be killed, raped, massacred, starved and worked to death. And they deserve it to be done again.

Your either a troll or a moron or possibly both.

Jesus christ, mate, you've lost it, many people have seen you come in and pull accusations from your bum with no basis in reality to MULTIPLE people.

 

[The Running Man]

Indian people actually integrate quite well into uk society and score quite low in terms of population growth and unemployment and crime.

 

[The Running Man]

They also tend to be better educated and take more managerial jobs than most groups:

 

[Mrwong]

I have nothing more to say to you.

I stopped listening when you said the Indians deserved to be killed, raped, massacred, starved and worked to death. And they deserve it to be done again.

Your either a troll or a moron or possibly both.

When did I say that? it is how you interpret it, not how I see it. You cant just accuse people of what you said when I never said that.
You are also insulting people.

I gave you a very short historical view, and said every race country has been at both ends. You focus on the British empire there have been many empires that have worse human right records.

Genghis Khan had largest land based empire in world history, yet you have not said anything about his empire which was more brutal than the British by far.

As I said Indian empires also treated people very bad yet you have not spoke about that.

When people solely speak about the British empire and constantly degrade the British people about history then they are racist. You need to learn history and then you will not be able to blame the British.