If you search number plates of 2005/2006 cars on Autotrader you should see that anything registered from March 2006 will be compliant but those registered before March 2006 will not automatically be compliant.
If they want to charge London prices or keep some certain contracts (depending on what they do), guess what, you got to go to London.
Sure, but personally I can only see it as a good thing that we're trying to move in a direction that helps promote cleaner air.So are all my cars, but it's about control. This will run out to the rest of the country. We have 60mph on the M4 going past Heathrow for "air quality" - it's a complete farce. We have clean air in Birmingham, the very least of the worries that Birmingham has. Then, as we all get to these "clean" EV cars that take huge amounts of fossil fuels to build, then they have the system to tax that already in place. Where do you think they'll get the money to run their wasteful programmes and schemes. HS2...?
Petrol cars after, not from 2005:
That's fine for the current zone, but the expansion will cover loads of outer London suburban areas where cars are very much still requiredWhy anyone would own a car living in London is beyond me tbh.
Girlfriend lives inside current ULEZ and if I were to move there I would just hire a zip or something similar car for a few days if I really needed one.
It comes from a report circa 2015 that people living in polluted cities where suffering from higher levels of asthma, this was directly attributed to the emissions from petrol and diesel vehicles. The ULEZ project was a knee jerk reaction to this report and along with the congestion charge has just made it more expensive to do business in central London whilst deterring day visitors (the take up of electric vehicles has done more for improving air pollution then any ULEZ scheme). The suspicion is Khan is pushing this as a cash grab to makeup for lost TFL revenues.Where is the idea that almost no one wants it coming from ? I live in London and most people i've spoken to about it don't seem to care either way. Granted that's not exactly a significant sample pool but having just done a quick google search for some polls it seems it's as popular as it is unpopular ?
Sounds like an issue with the business rather than the ULEZ coming in.They only charge London prices because of the expense and hassle of going there.
The rule is about whether they are Euro 4 compliant or not. Euro 4 was finalised in January 2005 and applied from January 2006. All cars from 2006 onwards are compliant, but many manufacturers already released compliant cars in 2005.
It's not entirely about pollution TBH. It's about forcing people on to the outsourced public transport. It's being profit driven.
I didn't say anything about it not being a minority.
OK, fair enough. Happy to own up when I've got it wrong.Do me a favour and put the following reg number into the TfL checker:
https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/check-your-vehicle/
Reg: LA05EFJ (petrol car registered in 2005 I plucked from Autotrader just now)
Tell us the results
Doesn't bother me, my car is ULEZ compliant.
Cars without tyres or brakes? Interesting. It's all a con the majority of the emissions they're concerned about don't even come out of the exhaust of a car.Thought this was more to get road users in to cars with lower emissions?
I dont agree with the expansion of ULEZ, but its not exactly hard to get a vehicle thats ULEZ compliant these days.
OK, fair enough. Happy to own up when I've got it wrong.
Why anyone would own a car living in London is beyond me tbh.
Girlfriend lives inside current ULEZ and if I were to move there I would just hire a zip or something similar car for a few days if I really needed one.
Yes, so an absolute minority do care, not the absolute majority that @Hades claimed
In outer London, nine out of ten cars and eight out of ten vans seen driving on an average day already meet the ULEZ standards, so their drivers will not have to pay the charge.
ULEZ will become 'Congestion Charge' once a majority are in EV's.
Kerching!