Rubens had 2 laps more fuel and was only <0.5s slower than Button
I don't think it's possible to rank them in 'goodness'. What kind of measure is this? How much is it influenced by being in the right car at the right time? How much on employing the right manager? How much on factors nothing to do with actually driving? They are all good - they all have strengths and weaknesses. I'd say the team, the budgets, the car, the management etc etc vary so much from driver to driver it's simply impossible to rank them like this.
Surprised they fuelled rubens that much considering they knew he had a penalty.
Why? So that McLaren can once again mess up their tactics or so that Hamilton has another one of his wet-weather-off-days?
Surprised they fuelled rubens that much considering they knew he had a penalty.
How about just 'cos wet races are always dramatic and changeable and nearly always throw up surprises? I'm confused by the assumption of fanboyism in these threads. Hamilton and Kubica are probably my favourites out of the current crop of drivers but I'd much rather watch a good race in which they do badly than a dull race in which they do well.
1 stopping has all but been eliminated with the new tyre regulations, the softs barely last 5 laps, and the race is a damn sight longer than 35 laps.How many laps is Malyasia? could the people with 30~ laps of fuel be one stopping it? Will be interesting to see how fast the first 8 are and whether the 30 lappers will get amongst them at the first stop.
How many laps is Malyasia? could the people with 30~ laps of fuel be one stopping it? Will be interesting to see how fast the first 8 are and whether the 30 lappers will get amongst them at the first stop.
1stopping at 35laps would mean a 70 lap race, it's only 56laps so easily doable fuel wise.and the race is a damn sight longer than 35 laps.
re read it.1stopping at 35laps would mean a 70 lap race, it's only 56laps so easily doable fuel wise. But you are right with tyres.
re read it.