Sorry to disappoint. But sunlight and gardening (well....pulling dead bits of tree out of the ground and stuffing them into the brown bin if that counts as gardening) mellows me right out, and in all honesty what would be the point in me trying to say that this is not necessarily Yet Another Example Of Pro-Ferrari Bias™?
I've been wondering since the start of this season what F1 would be like if they were still using the best tires available, fuel in pit stops, unrestricted rules for overtaking/defending a position and less restriction on aero.
Baffled by those after race punishments :/
Both completely unnecessary.
All in all a good race, however those penalties have left a bitter taste.
What on earth was the point of this FIA intervention. It has achieved nothing except "show the world how powerful we are! YEAH! LOOK AT US WE CAN MEDDLE WITH F1 RACE RESULTS IF WE FEEL LIKE IT. WHAT CAN YOU DO?!"
:Its a stewards decision not an FIA decision. Some people seem to have difficulty in understanding that.
Think as the FIA as parliament and the stewards as a judge in a particular case. The FIA has no involvement in that case.
Boring as sin, as they'd never get anywhere near the back of another car with unrestricted aero, as the cars would be far too dependent on it for their speed, along with probably being even more disruptive to following cars than it ever has before.
thats the offence....what did lewis do today then?
Why did Hamilton get that penalty when it looked perfectly fine
:
still not the right thing to do, surly you can see that.