Man sends banana to black mans table in Wetherspoons pub

Status
Not open for further replies.
People harping on about police resources are thick as mince.

If something is obvious and provable in an instant then the police should definitely act on it.

There is a difference between this and trying to trawl cctv to find someone with a covered face who stole a bike.
Why is it that the more so-called "liberally-minded" members of this forum are also the most likely to resort to insults and name calling in any argument.

There is a definite correlation between the people who view themselves as "progressives", and the likelihood of those people to make snide remarks and act in an extremely condescending manner.

No doubt the retort will be something like, "We're really fed up of all the racists/bigots and shouldn't have to put up with their ignorance," or something.
 
Yeah, why spend time going after criminals who cause harm to people and property when someone said mean words?

I'll go round to your grans house and tell her shes a ******* **** and she stinks of ******** ****.

Its only mean words right.

If using mean words was sustained and relentless would that become a problem? Lets say you have a teenage daughter who is getting constant written abuse on facebook. Just mean words yeah?

All your posts in this thread just imply you advocate this kind of behaviour.
 
If using mean words was sustained and relentless would that become a problem? Lets say you have a teenage daughter who is getting constant written abuse on facebook. Just mean words yeah?

All your posts in this thread just imply you advocate this kind of behaviour.
Does that mean you're in favour of the police getting involved in Facebook and Twitter postings (as they have been recently)?
 
Why is it that the more so-called "liberally-minded" members of this forum are also the most likely to resort to insults and name calling in any argument.

There is a definite correlation between the people who view themselves as "progressives", and the likelihood of those people to make snide remarks and act in an extremely condescending manner.

No doubt the retort will be something like, "We're really fed up of all the racists/bigots and shouldn't have to put up with their ignorance," or something.

Oh I called people thick because they are clearly not capable of thinking logically. Lets say the police had 10000 reported crimes but they only focused purely on the big hitters. Murder, terrorism, rape etc. Say 1%. But then they only managed to solve 10% of that.

So 10 people are satisfied their crime got solved.

How does that look for the police? You need balance. You take quick wins when you can.

If all evidence is clear as day and the paperwork requirement is a done deal then youd be retarded to not complete it.


Oh look, I said retarded.. Ive resorted to name calling to a defender of name calling.
 
Why is it that the more so-called "liberally-minded" members of this forum are also the most likely to resort to insults and name calling in any argument.

There is a definite correlation between the people who view themselves as "progressives", and the likelihood of those people to make snide remarks and act in an extremely condescending manner.

No doubt the retort will be something like, "We're really fed up of all the racists/bigots and shouldn't have to put up with their ignorance," or something.

They think the people they're opposed to are evil racists so naturally it's okay to insult them. Then you have groups like antifa who justify violence with the same logic. Lack of self awareness and critical thinking
 
Does that mean you're in favour of the police getting involved in Facebook and Twitter postings (as they have been recently)?

It would be easy for me to say no because I've never been subject to it. But I also know that some young people get bullied to the point of suicide through social media so anything to deter that is fine by me.
 
They think the people they're opposed to are evil racists so naturally it's okay to insult them. Then you have groups like antifa who justify violence with the same logic. Lack of self awareness and critical thinking

I said people who harp on about police resources are thick as mince. Where did race come into this?

Use some of your critical thinking and read what I wrote.
 
I'll go round to your grans house and tell her shes a ******* **** and she stinks of ******** ****.

Its only mean words right.

If using mean words was sustained and relentless would that become a problem? Lets say you have a teenage daughter who is getting constant written abuse on facebook. Just mean words yeah?

All your posts in this thread just imply you advocate this kind of behaviour.

Its still free speech, Why can people not see that you can not simply choose what people can say. Censorship requires a little nudge, And it keeps snowballing until the cops come and arrest you for calling your neighbour a pig.


And you will get a nice criminal record to boot,This is extremely dangerous and its sad so many people today think that now after so much human history you can police a mans mouth. Tell me did you go to University mate to have these views or were you born with them? I am genuinely curious.


And fyi, I support all free speech and think that section 5 needs repealed. Heck even Mr Bean agrees!
 
I'll go round to your grans house and tell her shes a ******* **** and she stinks of ******** ****.

Its only mean words right.

If using mean words was sustained and relentless would that become a problem? Lets say you have a teenage daughter who is getting constant written abuse on facebook. Just mean words yeah?

All your posts in this thread just imply you advocate this kind of behaviour.

How thick do you have to be to think a grown man going round to an elderly woman's house to insult her using clearly threatening language is the same as sending a grown man a banana in a pub?

Additionally...I'd suggest she puts up or stops using Facebook. Common sense, surely?

Interesting that you have chosen to highlight females in both cases, one young, one elderly, vs a grown man.
 
How thick do you have to be to think a grown man going round to an elderly woman's house to insult her using clearly threatening language is the same as sending a grown man a banana in a pub?

Additionally...I'd suggest she puts up or stops using Facebook. Common sense, surely?

Interesting that you have chosen to highlight females in both cases, one young, one elderly, vs a grown man.

Oh you are clutching now.

So the issue was location. If I go round to some black persons house and post bananas through their letterbox then is that sufficient escalation?

Lets use your Facebook comment.. Dont use it.. Common sense really..

Do we now say to the black guy "don't go into wetherspoons.. Common sense really".
 
Presumably making monkey noises/throwing bananas at sports events is also ok and the athletes just need to man up.

You people are the reason BLM exists. :)
 
Also before i check out here, I will say the reason for these crazy laws and prosecution is to silence people and make them comply with the new Britain. New Britain, Packed to the rafters with Africans and Muslims, And incase there are any little school fights you pass some laws so everyone is silenced for forced to comply.


All while those at the top live isolated in thier 100% white country estate, And thier nose in the trough because at the ene of the day more people means more profit. So it makes perfect sense to import as many people as you can. This is why the guy sent the Banana to begin with, Hes bitter about the colonization of his country. What else can he do? If hr goes public he will face consequences and be hounded so really mentally hes cornered into doing daft things like sending a banana.


And anyways, I know someone who went to therapy once and they gave him a leaflet instructing him to keep asking why over and over. So my challange to the anti free speech intellectuals is why did he send the Banana? And when you have the answer again ask why. And do it again for the next answer.


Tell me whos got the cojones to tell me where the why leads?
 
Racism probably sits at the top of the scale, followed closely by gender.
Followed closely by every gender except male, which I would say is very low down on the discrimination list unfortunately - just ask any modern, new dad.

when the police say they don't have resource to investigate theft, etc, then clearly there is only one conclusion to be drawn
I've been the victim of theft and never seen a Police officer, there's been no investigation as far as I can tell, just a crime recorded.
I know you're both intelligent enough to understand why police don't bother with everyday theft, using it as an argument in this instance is highly amusing. Surely you're looking directly at your blinkers right now?

an unsolicited banana
Hahaha I'm not sure why these words made me giggle so much :D
 
Oh you are clutching now.

So the issue was location. If I go round to some black persons house and post bananas through their letterbox then is that sufficient escalation?

Lets use your Facebook comment.. Dont use it.. Common sense really..

Do we now say to the black guy "don't go into wetherspoons.. Common sense really".

Well yes, location is entirely pertinent. One is a private address that you've deliberately targeted, one is a public space with third parties present.
There is a much higher level of threat in going to someone's home.
 
Also before i check out here, I will say the reason for these crazy laws and prosecution is to silence people and make them comply with the new Britain. New Britain, Packed to the rafters with Africans and Muslims, And incase there are any little school fights you pass some laws so everyone is silenced for forced to comply.


All while those at the top live isolated in thier 100% white country estate, And thier nose in the trough because at the ene of the day more people means more profit. So it makes perfect sense to import as many people as you can. This is why the guy sent the Banana to begin with, Hes bitter about the colonization of his country. What else can he do? If hr goes public he will face consequences and be hounded so really mentally hes cornered into doing daft things like sending a banana.


And anyways, I know someone who went to therapy once and they gave him a leaflet instructing him to keep asking why over and over. So my challange to the anti free speech intellectuals is why did he send the Banana? And when you have the answer again ask why. And do it again for the next answer.


Tell me whos got the cojones to tell me where the why leads?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Britain_Party

We could ask you why, but I suggest that the answer would be an utterly illogical hatred for people
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Britain_Party

We could ask you why, but I suggest that the answer would be an utterly illogical hatred for people

I dont really hate people actually, And it is never illogical. Logical hatred i might be guilty of but i can rational every view i have i think. So if you think i hate black people etc i would say no best of luck to them in Africa.


Hating BLM is perfectly logical though, If it is in the UK.
 
Well yes, location is entirely pertinent. One is a private address that you've deliberately targeted, one is a public space with third parties present.
There is a much higher level of threat in going to someone's home.

Ok. So can I verbally abuse your Gran (sorry grandad because you think I'm focusing on females) at the bingo (omg stereotypical) and just expect her to suck it up? Is it acceptable to do this?
 
Ok. So can I verbally abuse your Gran (sorry grandad because you think I'm focusing on females) at the bingo (omg stereotypical) and just expect her to suck it up? Is it acceptable to do this?

It's not acceptable but I don't think you should be prosecuted for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom