Manchester Bombing *** Please remain respectful and refrain from antagonising posts ***

completely and unequivocally remove ourselves from these conflicts most created by ourselves? Heck after getting out of Iraq we pretty much begged to go back in with the massive propaganda campaign a few years ago when all we were hearing about was Yazidis.

The only problem here is that then there would probably be all sorts of atrocities when we pulled out, they would then hold as responsible for those and the cycle would just all start again.
 
The only problem here is that then there would probably be all sorts of atrocities when we pulled out, they would then hold as responsible for those and the cycle would just all start again.

They would take over the region and eventually attack us anyway.

Lets not forget this all started with Muslim terrorists attacking New York. Before that we had the Iranian Embassy shooting, the Lockerbie bomber and a number of other smaller incidents.

We are fighting a mindset who still think it's 500 years ago.
 
Yes certainly (well a lot safer), we know for a fact that pretty every attack committed against the UK has been a direct result of the invasion of Iraq and other countries. In fact the attackers have gone out of their way to make this point for example

“We will not stop fighting you until you stop fighting us, an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth, in our land we have to see this every day” Michael Adebolajo

"Until we feel security, you will be our targets. And until you stop the bombing, gassing, imprisonment and torture of my people we will not stop this fight." Sidique Khan

Given we have tried everything and things have only gotten worse how about a new approach, completely and unequivocally remove ourselves from these conflicts most created by ourselves? Heck after getting out of Iraq we pretty much begged to go back in with the massive propaganda campaign a few years ago when all we were hearing about was Yazidis.

I don't think we should be held to ransom and change our entire foreign policy thanks to a few idiots carrying out attacks - it would frankly be ridiculous, if a terrorist group could change an entire country's policies that way. We've had plenty of other interventions such as Kosovo, Bosnia, Sierra Leone, the Falklands without people attacking, we didn't have Serbian or Russian orthodox Christian bombers carrying out attacks after the Kosovo campaign or Argentinian/Spanish people seeking revenge for the Falklands - the issue here is an ideological/religious one.
 
Yes certainly (well a lot safer), we know for a fact that pretty every attack committed against the UK has been a direct result of the invasion of Iraq and other countries. In fact the attackers have gone out of their way to make this point for example

Well then your deluded, people get killed over drawing cartoons, thats the threshold for violence, i've been arguing this for years on here im almost bored with saying it, but I will keep arguing becuase people like you exist everywhere.
 
The only problem here is that then there would probably be all sorts of atrocities when we pulled out, they would then hold as responsible for those and the cycle would just all start again.

It could be argued the problems wouldn't have even manifested if it wasn't for our invlovement in the first place, ISIS for example rose from the bloodbath the Iraq war was. Not that that helps now, but take France for example the vast majority of the problems began when they voluntarily got involved, prior they lived in relative peace.
 
ISIS would not exist had we not invaded Iraq and toppled the stable power of Saddam. Syria would not be a shell had we not toppled the stable power of Gaddafi. Life was infinitely better for it's civilians even under those dictatorial and oft-tyrannical leaderships.

Our military actions over the last couple of decades have led directly to the formation of ISIS and the breeding of mass extremism directed at the West. To deny that is just daft.

ISIS may not exist in its current form, however other groups have come before ISIS and have directed attacks against non-Muslims for 10's of years. My point is that even if there was no invasion in Iraq we would still be having attacks justified against us due to us simply not capitulating to total submission to Islam, because that is the aim of most of these groups - Total dominance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_groups
 
I don't think we should be held to ransom and change our entire foreign policy thanks to a few idiots carrying out attacks - it would frankly be ridiculous, if a terrorist group could change and entire country's policies that way. We've had plenty of other interventions such as Kosovo, Bosnia, Sierra Leone, the Falklands without people attacking, we didn't have Serbian or Russian orthodox Christian bombers carrying out attacks after the Kosovo campaign or Argentinian/Spanish people seeking revenge for the Falklands - the issue here is an ideological/religious one.
Ironically we were on the same side as the jihadis in both Bosnia and Kosovo - read up on this subject, a good number of British jihadis went to fight the Serbs and Croats and committed terrible atrocities there. That's where the current global jihad started - they saw incidents like the Dutch UN peacekeepers stand by and do nothing at Srebrenica and thought "these guys are weak". That's what it's all about really - hatred of the West is nothing new but they didn't attack us in the past because we were strong, now that's exposed as a bit of a myth so we invite the attacks on ourselves.
 
Please do me a favour, keep this thread on topic (sadly). As of right now, below this line
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll now just blanket delete any rubbish relating to off topic subjects
 
"Manchester Bombing ‘Twitter Prediction’ Hours Before Arena Attack Sparks Frenzy Of Debate"

As for the so called freelance writers sense of humour, he deleted one of these tweets after getting (rightly) thrown to the wolves for it, but is now claiming insight with "And now I have a small insight of what Donald Trump must deal with on a regular basis #ImpeachTrump"
I posted about that ages ago my wife said a few lads in work showed her the twitter page saying he was going to do it, sure the post was at about 18:30.
 
I posted about that ages ago my wife said a few lads in work showed her the twitter page saying he was going to do it, sure the post was at about 18:30.

there has been rather a lot of misinformation on this thread - yes there was seemingly a post made by an apparent ISIS supporter but I didn't think it was clear yet whether that was simply captured from a different time zone etc.. are you saying you heard about this potential attack early yesterday evening before it happened from your wife seeing that picture on twitter?
 
It would seem that the source I cited was correct, her husband was one of the first responders, thoughts with the family's at this time.

ohh please, 90% of the thread is speculation, as is the press.

and you really need to look at what has been confirmed, this was no speaker or balloon blowing up, nor was it only a stampede panic,

here you go.....

Vt35MTO.jpg
[/IMG]
Vt35MTO.jpg
 
Another very sad atrocity and done at a kids concert. A very sad world we live in and I am deeply saddened by this. My thoughts and prayers are with the families and friends of all those affected by such an evil person.
 
It would seem that the source I cited was correct, her husband was one of the first responders, thoughts with the family's at this time.

why didn't you just say that at the time - the person you quoted criticised you as you made an unsubstantiated claim
 
there has been rather a lot of misinformation on this thread - yes there was seemingly a post made by an apparent ISIS supporter but I didn't think it was clear yet whether that was simply captured from a different time zone etc.. are you saying you heard about this potential attack early yesterday evening before it happened from your wife seeing that picture on twitter?

No her work mates found it this morning and showed her, the tweet was made yesterday. I'm guessing it's been taken down now as I can't find anything. Sure someone will leak it though.
 
No her work mates found it this morning and showed her, the tweet was made yesterday. I'm guessing it's been taken down now as I can't find anything. Sure someone will leak it though.

ah ok - yes it was seen last night, someone mentioned it on here as being tweeted by Tommy Robinson - problem is the actual account is suspended and it isn't clear if it is a hoax (perhaps it was from a different time zone )- we don't know for sure that someone actually tweeted in advance of the attack - this could still have been a 'lone wolf'
 
Another sick act.

Can someone explain to me though why it's worse when it's against children than, say, innocent nurses or taxi drivers or hairdressers? None of these people have done anything to deserve their deaths or injuries.

They're all innocents :(
 
Back
Top Bottom