Yes but the jihadist would argue they arwnt true muslims as the quran is literal text from god and has to be interperated literalyprobably not, but most muslims (at least in the west) seem to choose non-violent interpretations
Yes but the jihadist would argue they arwnt true muslims as the quran is literal text from god and has to be interperated literalyprobably not, but most muslims (at least in the west) seem to choose non-violent interpretations
Yes but the jihadist would argue they arwnt true muslims as the quran is literal text from god and has to be interperated literaly
I would suggest you watch some Douglas Murray videos on YouTube to explain what is the logical reaction when some people try to claim that such terrorism has 'nothing' to do with the fanatics religion or culture. The clue is two fold 1) their fanatics and 2)the fundamentals of the religion matter there's a reason why we don't get scared by fundamentalist Jains....I echo the Bishop of Manchester's sentiments that this has nothing to do with any religious ideology or faith and it not representative of any culture or group of people. It's important not to jump to quick conclusions.
Again, our best weapon in defeating terror are muslim community members themselves who know when their neighbour or cousin is going off the deep-end and are willing to stop them. No amount of surveillance can match that. So massive affronts to their beliefs only weaken our ability to anticipate attacks like this.
Problem is we don't have the resources
Are you actively trying to ignore facts? Where were his family from before they came here, why might he be aggrieved...22yr old Salman Albedi named as the ****. Born in Manchester, raised in Manchester and lived all his life in Manchester, so I'd love to know how the apologists explain this one away. Because as far as I know, nether us nor the Americans have ever invaded Manchester, bombed Manchester or used our drones to target an individual in Manchester.
No the only sure way of defeating islamic terroists is to have a policy like saddam hussien enforced. Any suicide bomber blew himself up in Baghdad in his day and he'd make sure his friends and family died a very slow, horrific death and being tortured for a prolonged period. Not saying this is something i condone but once message gets out what will happen to your loved ones, family, children that will deter evem the most feverant nutjob.
Firstly, I doubt that would deter them. Secondly, you sound awfully keen on something you aren't condoning.No the only sure way of defeating islamic terroists is to have a policy like saddam hussien enforced. Any suicide bomber blew himself up in Baghdad in his day and he'd make sure his friends and family died a very slow, horrific death and being tortured for a prolonged period. Not saying this is something i condone but once message gets out what will happen to your loved ones, family, children that will deter evem the most feverant nutjob.
And the amoralist would argue in defence of this p9licy that if you dont want to see you own family brutaly murdered you shouldnt blow youraelf upin public places.
Even that is only so effective against fundamental Islamists.
It has to do with a minority of adherents to that faith.indeed - thus why I questioned the apparent assertion from the Bishop of Manchester that this has nothing to do with any religious ideology or faith
Education?It's sickening what has happened.
I just can't see things getting better anytime soon.
What can we do as a nation or even as a planet to stop this?
Um his family escaped a dictator, we provided shelter food etc. Then toppled the dictator and installed democracy. Yes the democracy went to he'll but that wasn't are fault.Are you actively trying to ignore facts? Where were his family from before they came here, why might he be aggrieved...
The guy who done it was not on any watch list.....We should be going in hard with the people on the watch lists for a start.
Problem is we don't have the resources and we live in a stupid country where people are not even prepared to pay more tax for essentials like a decent top tier health service.
If you want to go after these people you're going to have to pay for it. We are not spending or doing enough at the moment.
so we just ignoring the claim for the bomb by ISIS stating exactly why they did it then and we all suddenly become experts on Islamic Terrorists?
They care claiming its cause of what we do in the Middle East. Might be a cover for their general hatred of us but it might be true?
Firstly, I doubt that would deter them. Secondly, you sound awfully keen on something you aren't condoning.
Are you actively trying to ignore facts? Where were his family from before they came here, why might he be aggrieved...
The main goal of ISIS I think is to set up their own state pretty like what the jews achieved with terrorism.....Call me a conspiracy theory nut but If ISIS really were taking revenge or defending Islam then one of their prime targets would be Isreal due to the Palestinian oppression, etc. It seems rather suspect that they have never attempted to attack them yet attack everyone else. I haven't even heard of much news about them attacking the Syrian regime either.
Who are they really and what is their agenda is open to debate but it sure doesn't look like they are furthering the cause of Islam in a positive way.
How do you feel now it's been confirmed that the suicide bomber has been confirmed to be a soldier of the Islamic State?