Seems odd for it to be an attack from Israel. A bomb would have blown it up, but not had a fire going on for a while before hand.
Reporting 10 dead, be very suprised if this number doesn't at least triple!![]()
and the rest!
"The streets of East Beirut lay in apocalyptic ruin even four kilometres from the epicentre of the blast. Every building in between had lost some if not all of its windows. Huge shards of glass covered roads, some jagged pieces had ripped through cars. Trees were shredded, and pools of blood were commonplace. Blood trails lead to cars, and motorbikes that had sped the injured away to clinics or hospitals that could not cope with the dead and maimed."
Probably not an attack from Israel but they've targetted weapon storage/movement in this kind of context a bit recently. A bomb can leave stuff burning causing a bigger incident.
4KM is a huuuge damage radius, you need to playing about with 15/20kt bombs on 'Nukemap' to get that sort of damage radius from a surface explosion.
(Well aware Nukemap is hardly the end word in scientific analysis but still)
That can't be right can it?
Awful, looks like a mini nuke went off. In my completely not expert opinion, that can surely only be some variation of a fuel air bomb.
That can't be right can it?
Depends what explosives they were storing, the Tianjin explosion was circa 22kt's
You have to look at the scale of the damage as well - the damage done by a nuke in a 4KM radius will flatten most things - this just did serious damage.
That 15/20kt number was what you need to stick in the site to get 'windows blown out' at 4km
Where have you seen 18t TNT equiv. quoted? That seems the opposite, too small
Tianjin was 21t equivalent not kt.
Not a fireworks factory...