Associate
- Joined
- 4 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 617
Your responses echo other threads on this, with no clear consensus of opinion. It really is a tough call. At the moment, I am tending towards the E6850, after all it is 2 cores, and should handle any multi-core capability written into FSX/DX10 capability in the near future... and in the mean time, it's the best bang per buck out there in terms of raw CPU speed, which is what FSX craves.
I upgrade every 2 years: 2009 strikes me as the time when quad or more will be mainstream, and that future proofing now will be a less than effective exercise.
You know, in the world of digital photography, there is a phrase called "pixel envy", where people buy high pixel cameras (eg 10MegaPixel), which cost the earth, but where you can't tell the difference except on the rare occasion that you need a poster size hard copy.
I think that for FSX, we may be straying into a bit of "Core Envy"
I upgrade every 2 years: 2009 strikes me as the time when quad or more will be mainstream, and that future proofing now will be a less than effective exercise.
You know, in the world of digital photography, there is a phrase called "pixel envy", where people buy high pixel cameras (eg 10MegaPixel), which cost the earth, but where you can't tell the difference except on the rare occasion that you need a poster size hard copy.
I think that for FSX, we may be straying into a bit of "Core Envy"