Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,414
Are we back to the "Black people are more stabby, it must be the colour of their skin" argument?
- Status
based on relative ethnicity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_districts_and_their_ethnic_composition
Leeds: White 85 Mixed 2.7 Asian 7.7 Black 3.5 Arab 1.1
Definitely looks like it. Utterly shocking.
Also way to avoid the question.
The question was, if two all-white drug dealing gangs have rivalry, is that white culture??
You want me to explain something but then directly blow it off with sarcastic comments such as "waffle".
In Zen they say "if you come with a cup full, we cannot pour you tea, as in if your mind is already full you have nothing to learn from anyone else".
Maybe you like Bruce Lee? How how about Empty your mind? Be like water my friend.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EygqL--RW4
no. you said it yourself lol.
it's RAP culture, and absent father culture....
But then you externalise these two cultures as being exclusive to black people LOL.
A white man can be part of rap culture and absent father culture too!
Where did you dig that gem up? No one said anything was because of anyone's skin colour, and the implication that anyone has stated that is offensive and ridiculous
**** me, I'd like to nominate this guy for MoH.
Ok asim, so the problem is that white people aren't stabbing other white people in record numbers, so what's the reason if it isn't cultural? 95% of knife crime is black on black, why is that? 95% of people in London aren't black, so they represent a disproportionate amount of crime. This isn't an a race thing clearly, but there are some problems within that group of young black men that can only be cultural
Not wishing to be a grammar Nazi, but since you spell this incorrectly about 50% of the time you use it, just thought I'd point out it's spelt ridiculous.
We all have words we get a mental block with
London is populationally dense, meaning that turfs are very close, different groups, new people coming in all the time. It's not established by 1 or 2 gangs, there are hundreds of small gangs. The fact that a large propotion of people in london HAPPEN to be black needs to be recognised.
Take a look at glasgow, apparrently top 10 most dangerous cities in europe, but not many black people in glasgow. So is that white culture???
Not wishing to be a grammar Nazi, but since you spell this incorrectly about 50% of the time you use it, just thought I'd point out it's spelt ridiculous.
We all have words we get a mental block with
Thanks, happy to be corrected.
Specifically though, we're talking about the difference in crime levels between groups within the same city, if Black people were 95% of the population then it would make sense - but they aren't. Frankly this issue doesn't even affect me, it's Black people getting killed by other Black people in a city I don't live in, I'm not sure why there's this need to hide from facts when you could save lives by addressing them instead of citing ******** about Glasgow.
I want to share something but it’s too advance I’ll probably alienate people, and ego’s will go running for the hills.
But the matter of truth is, everyone is you.
An attack on another is ultimately an attack on yourself.
There is only one consciousness and that consciousness will play the role of every single experience to never ending infinity.
The rape victim and the rapist are one and the same consciousness that experiences two perspectives.
I understand this is extremely hard to accept and seems ridiculous but, just open your mind to this truth, even a little bit.
Let me make an example:
Let’s saying you’re in a sci-fi like star trek and there is a legit cloning machine. You go into cloning machine as 1 person and out comes 100 versions of you.
Each of these 100 version of yourself will look at each other and ponder why am I me and not him? And each of these versions of yourself can go off and have different experiences.
Duality happens on the level of mind, not consciousness, there is one infinite field of conscious and when the mind enters in it becomes dual.
This has already happened in the form of Evolution, evolution was two cells that merged together and clone itself, over and over until you had all sorts of creature. Every person, every animal on this planet is a clone of yourself, say hi to your long lost clone who has gone through millions of years of their own journey.
In other words, you’re not the HDD drive that files are stored on, you are the electric power (soul) that powers it up. You’ve always been consciousness hence why when you sleep the body does a million things and you have no memory, because again you are “consciousness” not the body.
If you know this truth in your heart, you can't help but be compassionate towards yourself.
But the matter of truth is, everyone is you.
An attack on another is ultimately an attack on yourself.
There is only one consciousness and that consciousness will play the role of every single experience to never ending infinity.
The rape victim and the rapist are one and the same consciousness that experiences two perspectives.
I understand this is extremely hard to accept and seems ridiculous but, just open your mind to this truth, even a little bit.
Let me make an example:
Let’s saying you’re in a sci-fi like star trek and there is a legit cloning machine. You go into cloning machine as 1 person and out comes 100 versions of you.
Each of these 100 version of yourself will look at each other and ponder why am I me and not him? And each of these versions of yourself can go off and have different experiences.
Duality happens on the level of mind, not consciousness, there is one infinite field of conscious and when the mind enters in it becomes dual.
This has already happened in the form of Evolution, evolution was two cells that merged together and clone itself, over and over until you had all sorts of creature. Every person, every animal on this planet is a clone of yourself, say hi to your long lost clone who has gone through millions of years of their own journey.
In other words, you’re not the HDD drive that files are stored on, you are the electric power (soul) that powers it up. You’ve always been consciousness hence why when you sleep the body does a million things and you have no memory, because again you are “consciousness” not the body.
If you know this truth in your heart, you can't help but be compassionate towards yourself.
Is that simply a statement of faith based on ideological belief or Has anybody actually carried out a objective scientific study to confirm or debunk this particular theory?
(I doubt it very much! It would be career suicide for any Academic to even think about doing so in the current political climate.)
However, It Might be.
I think that the idea that chronic Vitamin D deficiency might be a relevant factor in a tendency towards violent criminal behavior is a not at all unreasonable one.
It isnt just about soft bones. I am sure i have read that VitD deficiency is associated with Depression, Schizophrenia, Poor neurological development from childhood and even metabolic disorders such as diabetes.
All of these can have dramatic effects on mood and temperament and could easily result in people being more inclined to extreme violence.
It would be a shame if something that is actually a major problem across the developed world, which are Mostly high latitudes where dark skins are likley to be a very high risk factor for VitD deficiency (See Note #1), IE That The utterly disproportionate and excessive amount of violent crime committed by Black people could be mitigated (See Note #2) by something as simple as a daily dose of "WellBlackMan" is missed because nobody is willing to take the risk of even looking for fear of committing some sort of political heresy (Like Rotherham again etc)
Mind, It probably wouldn't make any difference even if such a link was conclusively shown to exist.
I can see it now. It would be just like water fluoridation and Vaccination.
Within minutes of such a study being published you would get the activists going all
"Yo White Man want to drug the Black Man to keep him down!" (And so on)
So, even if a study did show a definitive link, the chances of any actual action taking place is minimal and indeed, the chances of any such study being suppressed verges on certainty.
Note #1;
The pale skins of northern Europeans will have evolved in the time since the end of the last ice age from a base population that would probably have had rather darker skins. This is really a blink of an eye in evolutionary terms and suggests that the evolutionary selective pressure against dark skins in high latitudes isn't just severe. It is extreme. Given this factor it seems nuts not to at least investigate, as a possibility, (Even if it simply to definitively eliminate it as a possibility) that yes, Skin tone Might be a factor in why this particular demographic of people perform so spectacularly poorly, as a group, in developed high latitude societies. Not just in small isolated pockets. But everywhere where they are present. To actively ignore the possibility for purely ideological reasons is simply insane.
Note #2;
I use the phrase "Mitigated" since situations like this are very unlikely to be down to one single cause. There are likely to be other factors too, all of which need to be taken into consideration. Just for balance I will also offer a rather more "PC" socioeconomic scenario...
There are more "Poor" White people in the USA than there are Black people in total.
And yet we do not see corresponding levels of White violent crime associated with this poverty in the way it is offered as a cause for violent crime in Black populations.
Why might this be? Skin colour again? No not necessarily. There is a very big difference in the socioeconomics of White and Black poverty in the USA.
The Poor Whites tend to live in the country, The poor Blacks in inner cities. Now the rural poor are not without their problems (Meth and Opiates are a major issue) but, in the main, in the USA in particular it is likley to be far easier to live on a low income in the countryside than in the middle of a city.
In a city, everything has to be bought ( or stolen) There is a constant pressing need for cash money wherever you go and whatever you do. In the countryside, the pressure for a constant supply of cash money is far lower. Land/Property is cheap. Food is cheap. there is plenty of room for rural poor to grow some/all of their own food and there is even ample opportunity for subsistence hunting (Very common I would imagine in rural USA) which keeps living costs even lower.
There is simply far less pressure on the rural poor to become involved in violent organized crime. Oh for sure, where there is drugs there is often violence. but in the countryside the pressure, even for that, is going to be far less. (Towns perhaps 50/100 miles apart may well have their own competing drug Mobs, but this is very different from having competing Urban Mobs only a city block or two apart from one another.)
If one was to reverse the residential roles (Poor Blacks/Country. Poor Whites/City) I would be not at all surprised if Black crime rates went down and White crime rates went up...
Soldato
GD logic: Black criminal drug dealer kills another in gang violence 'Hmmm, black culture sure is violent' 
Excellent post above.
So in a nutshell are you saying it's not really limited to black-white culture, it's more country vs city culture?
- Status