Caporegime
I thought it was a bit odd...
Well, that's why my message was that this is just personal. Some people will find it annoying, some people will just used to it, some people will ignore it, for some people it would not be important (as only black background is affected), some people will sacrifice it for the improved monitor clarity, smoothness and colour reproduction ... etc. I would suggest that you give a few days to the monitor and see how it goes. If it's still unbearable or annoying then probably you will never adapt to this type of screen.Chaos said:After a good sesion with this monitor im seriously considering returning it, dont get me wrong gaming etc was awsome but im finding the glossy reflective screen to overpowering, think it might be the way my room is set up but the reflection of the screen is very anoying even after changing the lights in my room its still an issue
Excuse me, but what is the point of this thread and what are you trying to tell us here ?FoxEye said:Taken from the AnandTech forums:
http://forums.anandtech.com/message...eyword=&STARTPAGE=6&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
I wonder. Instead of posting some stupid pictures where there is a 200W bulb just above the monitors, maybe it would be more "constructive" that we hear & learn from user comments here.FoxEye said:Some photos of the glossy screen, which I'm getting pretty dubious about:
http://www.prad.de/board/attachment.php?attachmentid=4603
That looks pretty bad.
You have such talk when people are not informed and they are lazy to do some actual research, before posting such information on the forum and confuse everyone. As I said before, IPS panels are offering "traditionally" full 24-bit colour. In other words they are natively 8-bit.Raymond Lin said:Whats all this talk on AnandTech about the NEC being a 8bit panel?
igors said:Question is how much is too much, what percentage of the units are affected and if such problem will fade away after the monitor burn in (as reported by BigChin1).
Gibbo said:Are you all buying these from OcUK?
Interesting enough, as my monitor is now running for almost 18 days, I tried to increase the brightness to 100% and no single trace of backlight.BigChin1 said:The monitor has been on for about 8 hours today. The level of brightness will affect perceived backlight bleed, and I'm currently set at 32% for both brightness and contrast. What kind of level is everyone else using?
When you mentioned this, just remembered that one user told me that picture on his previous TFT with anti-reflective coating was somewhat more "fuzzy" and with much less "clarity" (apart from doing the anti reflective job). Apparently, he didn't like it. Not sure what is the meaning of this, from either perceptive or technological level.BigChin1 said:T Perhaps if you already have a TFT with an anti-reflective coating the difference may be more pronounced.
sorryFoxEye said:You haven't added on delivery charge have you
frogboy said:I'm not so sure about this monitor anymore. £400+ for a wider 17" monitor is too much in my opinion, coupled with no HDCP, seems like a great way to lose loads of money if you ask me..
This glossy screen although nice, could be an absolute nightmare during daylight hours with a window nearby. Think I might limp on until 22" come along at the same price with HDCP, could be in for a very long wait..
frogboy said:I'm not so sure about this monitor anymore. £400+ for a wider 17" monitor is too much in my opinion, coupled with no HDCP, seems like a great way to lose loads of money if you ask me..
This glossy screen although nice, could be an absolute nightmare during daylight hours with a window nearby. Think I might limp on until 22" come along at the same price with HDCP, could be in for a very long wait..
Heh, the first link was unnecessary, was just to show where I found the pictures The second link was the picture itself, naturally. I posted them because I thought it would be helpful for people to actually see the glossy coating. There is only so much you can describe with words, ya know?igors said:Excuse me, but what is the point of this thread and what are you trying to tell us here ?
I wonder. Instead of posting some stupid pictures where there is a 200W bulb just above the monitors, maybe it would be more "constructive" that we hear & learn from user comments here.
FoxEye said:That's interesting. If it turns out that backlight bleed is a possibility, I think I'll end up going with the Philips instead.
Are you joking with me ? Last thing that I want is to be defensive in this thread ?! You may actually read complete thread and see how & why.FoxEye said:As for what am I trying to tell you? I think you're being a bit defensive here, and that just makes me wonder why?
That room is *very* bright and that viewing angle is simply "strange". Who will look at the monitor from that FOV ?! Also, that scene & environment is not indicative nor common one (as each of you out there is surrounded by different environment when using the monitor). So ... what such picture is the proof of ?? And to repeat again:FoxEye said:I am certainly not implying that users here are somehow not as expert as Anand users, and hope you didn't get that impression. But where did you get the idea that there was a 200W bulb just above the monitor? That room doesn't look over-bright to me.
igors said:... maybe it would be more "constructive" that we hear & learn from user comments here
?!?!?!FoxEye said:As for the picture being "stupid", well if enough feel that it is a moderator can remove it, I'm sure. It's not exactly false advertising now is it?
Fair enough.FoxEye said:Anyway, no need to start an argument here, so I'll leave it at that