Associate
- Joined
- 10 May 2012
- Posts
- 1,704
Are you on floatplane?For anyone that follows LinusTechTips on floatplane he has released his review of this monitor today. Should be on youtube for everyone next week.
Is review positive?
Are you on floatplane?For anyone that follows LinusTechTips on floatplane he has released his review of this monitor today. Should be on youtube for everyone next week.
Yes the review was very positive.Are you on floatplane?
Is review positive?
Yes the review was very positive.
I imagine most people want to hear about the 1 MS quoted response time. Unfortunately LTT didn't specify figures for pixel response but they did compare pixel response using blur busters guide with a camera on a slider. All monitors at 120 Hz they compared to the LG 34GK950G and Asus PG258Q and in the results it looked better than both because there was more ghosting on the 34GK950G and the PG258Q had some overshoot. I am not sure how fair this comparison is though as the PG258Q is a 240 Hz display. I don't know what OD settings they were using on the other monitors but on the 27GL850 they were using the fast setting because fastest introduced ridiculous levels of overshoot. It looks like the fastest mode was just to get the 1 MS figure on the box but fast setting seems to work great. It will be interesting to see what the response times are on the fast setting once of the bigger monitor reviewers take a look.
Must admit that LG 27" Nano does look tempting! My Dell has an annoying thunder bug stuck behind the screen so this could be a perfect excuse for me to get a new screen.
Yes the review was very positive.
I imagine most people want to hear about the 1 MS quoted response time. Unfortunately LTT didn't specify figures for pixel response but they did compare pixel response using blur busters guide with a camera on a slider. All monitors at 120 Hz they compared to the LG 34GK950G and Asus PG258Q and in the results it looked better than both because there was more ghosting on the 34GK950G and the PG258Q had some overshoot. I am not sure how fair this comparison is though as the PG258Q is a 240 Hz display. I don't know what OD settings they were using on the other monitors but on the 27GL850 they were using the fast setting because fastest introduced ridiculous levels of overshoot. It looks like the fastest mode was just to get the 1 MS figure on the box but fast setting seems to work great. It will be interesting to see what the response times are on the fast setting once of the bigger monitor reviewers take a look.
They did not touch on BLB or IPS glow at all.Thanks for the information. I would imagine most people want to hear about blb and glow and whether the panel lottery is finally over.. Could you tell us a little more?
They had only positive things to say in this regard. The only real negatives that I recall being brought up in the review were the lack of even basic HDR certification due to the low peak brightness and lack of local dimming but we already knew this from the spec sheet.How did it fair for colour accuracy? Gamma? Calibration? sRGB etc?
They did not touch on BLB or IPS glow at all.
They had only positive things to say in this regard. The only real negatives that I recall being brought up in the review were the lack of even basic HDR certification due to the low peak brightness and lack of local dimming but we already knew this from the spec sheet.
They did not touch on BLB or IPS glow at all.
They had only positive things to say in this regard. The only real negatives that I recall being brought up in the review were the lack of even basic HDR certification due to the low peak brightness and lack of local dimming but we already knew this from the spec sheet.
Do you have any links?Few first impressions from a few people.over in China.
Yes, it seems that one shop was already shipping it.Seen a post about a shop in the Netherlands stocking too.
Just called Overclockers and was told that the ETA was pushed back again to next week which is rather annoying.