My experience with the 950 has not been good at all. I don't want to be a killjoy to the people who have the monitor and are enjoying it but I promised that I would be honest in my appraisal, whether I kept it or not, for the people thinking of buying one.
It has washed out colours and details, it's like everything on the screen lacks detail and definition, terrible banding, noticeable input lag, bad screen uniformity and a horrifically reflective glossy panel.
Tried every combination of settings both on the monitor and my gpu control panel trying to make it look half decent.
Compared to my trusty old 245b, it looked like garbage, a step down in every way. The only thing it had over my current monitor was the 120hz but the higher input lag meant that even that didn't count.
Actually, the response time on "fastest" was very nice. That was the monitors strong point.
Will go into more detail when I get the chance over the next week or so.
Again, I may have just had a bad panel, seems I'm unlucky when it comes to monitors.
Input lag is certainly manageable and I don't doubt that most people won't notice it. I play a lot of fps games and japanese shmups that require fast reflexes. I'm not saying that I'm superman, just that I'm quite sensitive to it and notice any change from what I'm used to. Playing in the "thru" mode on the lg I tried was a "wow!" moment. Far better than what I'm used to, this monitor was the exact opposite. Just waggling the stick around in akai katana shin you can see the delay, games like black ops and left for dead 2, very responsive games, felt a lot more floaty.
A game like fear 3 which isn't terrible but has quite a muddy mouse look responsiveness felt like it had vsync on at 60hz when played on this monitor. Played on my 245b (average of around 7ms input lag), it's totally passable.
This is all subjective, I don't have a crt to measure the actual numbers, it's just how it feels to me.