Well I finally got around to watching the first two new episodes, and it's not as bad as I thought it was going to be. Visual effects are off the chart great, even with too much JJ lens flare. I quite like the main character (stupid name excepted) as I quite like that "emotional human trying to escape a Vulcan upbringing". It makes her kind of like Seven-of-Nine ie clever in lots of ways, dumb in others. Sure, people were dumb here and there, there were a few plot holes here and there, all other characters turned out to be disposable and disposed of (so no crew characters acting together). The story itself ran along nicely with a certain momentum that didn't really falter. The Klingons were kind of big and clunky, and reminded me too much of the Kilrathi in the not-so-good Wing Commander movie. Their faces had little expression, and even speaking they didn't look that good.
I got the distinct impression that CBS had made the first two episodes, and then decided they didn't like them. There's such a disconnect from the Ep 3 trailer, it's like they changed everything (maybe this was when the original showrunner was booted off and Michelle Yeoh decided to bail). I think you could watch from Ep 3, and not really notice the absence of 1 & 2.
So, they could have done a few things better, but it's not a disaster. They have quite a bit they can improve on, and it's still early days for a Trek show (most of which took at least one or two series to find it's feet). I think they have to walk a very fine line with Discovery. Make it too much like previous Treks, and it will be considered boring and all seen before. Too different, and it's not Trek enough. By concentrating on Michael as the main character, they might get somewhere with that as a new approach, however it's a lot of weight to put on the shoulders of one actor/character. I'm not sure either the character or actress is good enough to pull that off. Even Kirk needed Spock, McCoy, and the rest of the crew, and Michael is no Kirk.