I think in this day and age it is utterly imperative we are critical of new games. If we just accept any old crud then we are more likely to accept the same level of crud in the future. Its a bit like EA not giving a **** about making real and massive enhancements to FIFA because they just need to do the same old thing as last time with small improvements because people will buy it anyway.
E.g. NMS is supposed to be massive and open world game. However that doesnt mean its actually a GOOD open world game. I dont want this game to sell a ton of copies if it has one of the poorest and most shallow open world game experiences. Developers should be looking at games like Witcher 3, GTA V or Skyrim(maybe) as the yardsticks to beat regarding open world content gaming.
They shouldnt just post a ton of crap (random world/creature/plant environment creator) and try to flannel/big it up as being something amazing...like they think they have re-invented the wheel or something.
Do you see what i'm getting at? I just want pc gaming to get better not go backwards in the kind of content delivered.
Thankfully we have DEUS EX Mankind Divided coming soon looks EPIC!- that imho is in another league to NMS. It looks very story rich, immersive and open world also. Proper open world...not fannying about in pretend RNG open world.
You've just said we should be critical of new games like NMS, and you're right....then gone on to say Deus Ex:MD looks EPIC, with a lot less evidence to form an opinion with than is available for NMS.