Number plates for cyclists...

'It comes after Mr Shapps pledged to create a "death by dangerous cycling" law to "impress on cyclists the real harm they can cause when speed is combined with lack of care".

The move will close a legal loophole which means that cyclists who kill pedestrians can only be jailed for two years.'


Obviously, if someone is responsible for killing someone through negligence/recklessness then they should receive a sufficiently harsh punishment. But my experience of pedestrians while cycling is that they are unconcerned about keeping an eye out for cyclists and often just step out onto the road without even looking. A lot of people walk along staring at their iPhones nowadays. No cyclist wants to hit a pedestrian, not least because they are likely to get thrown over the handlebars and seriously injured themselves, so drawing an equivalence with a 2 tonne car is rather silly.

Shapps's other suggestions about number plates, licenses, insurance etc are clearly designed to appeal to the Tory Party's blue-rinse brigade/Daily Mail readers rather than doing something useful to actually make the roads safer. They are always bitching about cyclists not having to pay road tax and not being licensed etc. The fact that two pedestrians each year are killed after being hit by cyclists whereas around 430 die every year after being hit by cars really tells you how screwed up are Shapps's priorities for the targeting of the state's finite resources. If they do require all bicycles to be registered and display number plates then that will officially make us as restrictive as North Korea when it comes to cycling, only they have such a system for pedal bikes!
 
No they aren’t. Speed limits only apply to motorised vehicles under rule 124 in the Highway Code and they are a “must” bicycles are not included

Is that correct? National speed limits are set for different types of vehicles, but local speed limits can also apply and appear to apply to all road vehicles.

Highway Code said:
This section should be read by all drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders.

The following line appears below and separate from the table of speed limits:

Rule 124 said:
Locally set speed limits may apply, for example

It is the speeds in the Road Traffic Act that are restricted to motor vehicles. So you cannot be done for exceeding the nationally set speed limit (e.g. 30 in an urban environment) on a bicycle, but if you exceed an explicitly set speed limit (say 20 near a school) then it looks like you can be done.

Hmm... how about a hovercraft?
 
No they aren’t. Speed limits only apply to motorised vehicles under rule 124 in the Highway Code and they are a “must” bicycles are not included
Presumably, that's because when the Highway Code was first produced the lowest speed limit in common use was 30 mph and no one thought pedal-powered bicycles would exceed that speed for more than a few moments.
 
My thoughts as a car driver, biker and cyclist :-

1) Motorised/Powered vehicles like e-bikes and e-scooters (if ever made road legal) should be registered and insured. Plus there should be strict speed/power limits on them. If they're exceeded they should be subject to the same regulations, licensing as cars and motorbikes.

2) Police need to actually make an effort to crack down and prosecute those caught breaking the law by riding on pavements (whether pedal or e-bikes) or flouting speed/power retrictions.

3) Pedal bikes shouldn't be subject to the same regulations/restrictions as electrically powered vehicles like ebikes, escooters, etc.

To my mind point 2 is the biggest problem. I've never seen police make any effort to stop those who are clearly breaking the law by riding on pavements. Likewise I've never seen anyone riding an e-scooter on the road, which is currently illegal, stopped by the police. Plus I've been overtaken at 30-40mph by pedal ebikes which are clearly unrestricted.

1) There are already strict speed/power limits on e-bikes. If you're using a motor over 250W then your bike is an e-moped and is subject to the same MOT, vehicle registration/number-plates and mandatory third-party insurance requirements as any other motor vehicle. Why should under 250W e-bikes be registered and third-party insured? They are unable to go at over 15.5 mph (while requiring you to pedal) and are a lot slower than that if you are pulling a trailer up a hill.

2) 10 years ago I saw the Police stop someone for riding on the pavement, but Police numbers are so low nowadays they must prioritise their resources on more serious matters. Nonetheless, I would never overtake a Police car at 30-40 mph on a pedal e-bike!
 
Cool. Petition for those 10 cyclists to be forced to cycle single file taking up 20m+ of the road and still riding in the safe area in the road. You will never be able to get past them safely then...

Perhaps if you thought about why they do it instead of thinking that they want attention (I mean come on) then you might have realised why its preferable when cyclists are in a group.

The main thing that causes traffic is...cars.
Those 10 cyclists can get themselves down the gym and maintain their fitness in a safe environment.

Problem; solved.
 
I believe they are, it's just that the Police won't prosecute a cyclist who momentarily exceeds a speed limit while going down a hill because that would be pointless and look ridiculous. The posted speed limit applies to all vehicles driving down that road (unless there is a lower maximum speed limit set for particular vehicles, like trucks/caravans/etc on motorways). It doesn't matter if they are propelled by an internal combustion engine, electric motor, human peddle power or a horse. After all, cyclists still have to obey the direction of traffic on one-way streets and stop at red traffic lights etc so why would they be exempt from the posted speed limit? I suspect Grant Shapps is talking out of his arse as usual.
They're not.

"Speed limits listed in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and also Rule 124 of the Highway Code relate to motor vehicles and not to bicycles."

You can't be done for speeding on a bicycle, but they can do you for "cycling furiously"
 
They're not.

"Speed limits listed in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and also Rule 124 of the Highway Code relate to motor vehicles and not to bicycles."

You can't be done for speeding on a bicycle, but they can do you for "cycling furiously"

Interesting. But see this post by Quartz:

 
Interesting. But see this post by Quartz:

Yeah saw that, it's wrong. It's bylaw based speed limits that apply.

"It is, however, possible for local bylaws to impose speed limits on cyclists. For example, on Hampstead Heath in London there is an 8mph speed limit for cyclists, and in Richmond Park the speed limit of 20 miles per hour for vehicles also applies to cyclists."
 
just ban cyclists, too much competition for boris bike/scooters and some tory donor ain't making enough monies

"It is, however, possible for local bylaws to impose speed limits on cyclists. For example, on Hampstead Heath in London there is an 8mph speed limit for cyclists, and in Richmond Park the speed limit of 20 miles per hour for vehicles also applies to cyclists."
just because cyclists don't have actual speed laws doesn't mean they can't be arrested of breaking them, there's different laws for cycling dangerously that apply


Horses should get license plates too, see how the toffs like it, they also should pick up the crap they leave behind, sick off seeing massive mountains of poo in cycle lanes
 
just ban cyclists, too much competition for boris bike/scooters and some tory donor ain't making enough monies


just because cyclists don't have actual speed laws doesn't mean they can't be arrested of breaking them, there's different laws for cycling dangerously that apply


Horses should get license plates too, see how the toffs like it, they also should pick up the crap they leave behind, sick off seeing massive mountains of poo in cycle lanes
Already covered under "cycling furiously".
Pretty sure that can only be applied if someone has been injured though.
 
Is that correct? National speed limits are set for different types of vehicles, but local speed limits can also apply and appear to apply to all road vehicles.

If you look at the links to the actual laws at the bottom of rule 124, it specifically says the limits apply to "motor vehicles":
It shall not be lawful for a person to drive a motor vehicle of any class on a road at a speed greater than the speed specified in Schedule 6 to this Act as the maximum speed in relation to a vehicle of that class.
A bicycle is not classed as a motor vehicle so these speed limits do not apply.

edit: edited because I said a bicycle wasn't a vehicle, it is but it's not a motor vehicle.
 
no it's "wanton and dangerous cycling" or something like that if someone gets injured
"Wanton and furious cycling" actually. But yes I thought it was a thing about the injury bit so can't be used to just do a cyclist for speeding unless they hurt someone.
 
Sorry but this is just nonsense... a cyclist on a pushbike is still more than capable of killing a pedestrian in a collision if a bit of "bad luck" joins in, so to try and act like "but, but, it's a cyclist, what harm can they do?" is just laughable.
Yet the reali
 
As a road cyclist the 20mph limit made me chuckle. They aren't the sort of speeds you'd do in a built up area, why ruin your ride. Notwithstanding you'd ordinarily have to bust a gut to exceed it for any sort of length of time. Shapps making out the TDF peloton is rocking up Chertsey High St on a regular basis :D

Load of nonsense including the number plate thing - put it to bed and concentrate on some real issues please, which is just about everything else at the moment.
 
So will the government be providing every cyclist with a GPS cycling computer/speedo and where do they expect people to locate a licence plate on a bike? Personally, if this idiocy becomes law I'm just going to ignore it and carry on cycling as usual. **** 'em!
 
So will the government be providing every cyclist with a GPS cycling computer/speedo and where do they expect people to locate a licence plate on a bike? Personally, if this idiocy becomes law I'm just going to ignore it and carry on cycling as usual. **** 'em!

Maybe you'll be exempt from the rules if your bike doesn't come with one built in. A bit like being exempt from wearing a seatbelt in a car if they were not fitted from the factory.
 
A bicycle is not classed as a motor vehicle so these speed limits do not apply.

Yes, you are quite correct that the laws referenced apply to motor vehicles, but the paragraph at the bottom of 124 I quoted is completely separate and makes no mention of vehicle type or national laws.

Yeah saw that, it's wrong. It's bylaw based speed limits that apply.

Ah, read-ahead mode was off!
 
Back
Top Bottom