Soldato
I only jumped on 4k last year personally, as I felt it's only the last couple of years that 4k monitors got decent pixel response, refresh rate etc.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA 4000 Series
- Thread starter MrClippy
- Start date
Soldato
Yea thats what i thought?
I doubt many have 4k monitors, nevermind gamin at 4k 120fps.
So i stand by what i say, high end is still 4k 60fps.
The insane 0.5% of gamers are in the 4k 120fps bracket
Associate
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2012
- Posts
- 389
Massive fans on RTX4000
Supposedly 4090 is the green bar, no idea what the grey bar is
Given that list of games and renderers, I'm assuming that's relative ray-tracing performance
The desire to play at 100fps+ has been around for over a decade, when high refresh rate monitors have been avilable available. The 3000 series is what enabled this to be possible at 4K in most games.
4K at 100fps+ is possible on 3090, though either requires DLSS (makes games slightly blurry, so not perfect) or requires lowering some settings (shadows, RT) to medium etc.
4k with some settings lowered still looks way better than 1440P ultra to my eyes.
Ah, don’t be like that Chuky
Each to their own. I would not worry about what others say. If 60fps is fine for you then who cares what Dave or others may say?
Poor PS5 users stuck on 30fps unless they want to lower image quality to hit 60fps in performance mode. How must they feel?
Agreed. Even though I am not on 4K anymore, I had a 4K monitor for like 7+ years and every time I tested it with a 1440p monitor next to it I found this to be the case.
I will eventually go back to 4K once they release a OLED monitor like the one I have, because OLED and proper HDR that comes with it makes an even bigger difference to image quality. I would love 27” or max 32” 4K QD-OLED monitor.
That's exactly the kind of jump in RT I would love to seeBut not expecting it to be quite as much as that....
I am actually hoping for RT performance to double.
Soldato
Wait until you guys find out about VR... Dual 4k outputs needing 72fps minimum, preferably 120...
Soldato
I guess it depends on what Nvidia is expecting.
If you look at what happened to the 3090Ti, it seems Nvidia has had a rather rude awakening.
Maybe they will learn from it. Maybe not.
not if you play on 27 inch 1440p screen
on desktop at 4K on that size yeah I can see its more sharper in gaming its not worth the extra FPS drop with hardly any difference in quality 32-34+ inch 4K with nice headroom over 100fps would be nice
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,012
No thanks, am not a sucker for punishment...
Nvidia shareholders are in for a rude awakening more like when people won't buy them apart from a few rich people.
No miners.
No scalpers.
Gamers don't even need them apart from to own the latest thing.
Nearly every country is in a recession and has issues anyway GPU will be the last thing on most peoples minds...
Nvidia say the average GPU price should be the same price as a console.... so 4070ti should be like 400 quid or something at most
Source
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang on Q2 2023 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NASDAQ:NVDA) Q2 2023 Results Conference Call August 24, 2022 5:00 PM ETCompany ParticipantsSimona Jankowski - Head of IRJensen...
seekingalpha.com
Unfortunately with the pound currently in the gutter we could be looking at £100-£200 more against the dollar price. A 4070 could easily be £600 and they blame the exchange rate.Nvidia shareholders are in for a rude awakening more like when people won't buy them apart from a few rich people.
No miners.
No scalpers.
Gamers don't even need them apart from to own the latest thing.
Nearly every country is in a recession and has issues anyway GPU will be the last thing on most peoples minds...
Nvidia say the average GPU price should be the same price as a console.... so 4070ti should be like 400 quid or something at most
Source
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang on Q2 2023 Results - Earnings Call Transcript
NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NASDAQ:NVDA) Q2 2023 Results Conference Call August 24, 2022 5:00 PM ETCompany ParticipantsSimona Jankowski - Head of IRJensen...
just an excuse to rip people off as long as the cards are made outside of USA.
ps5 in USA seems to be around 550USD and in the UK around 449
Jensen is gonna regret saying the average price of geforce should be the same as a console, also shows 3000 series was atleast 2-4x over priced
They can easily price a 4050 or 4060 that offers equivalent performance on par with a PS5 which will be no good for us gamers running 100Hz+ displays at high resolutions.
Soldato
Would not be an issue if that were the top card.
is 4050 and 4060 considered average or low end.
I'ma assume he meant "mid end" when he says the average price of a geforce which would in most peoples minds be atleast a 4060ti and probably a 4070
he never mentioned equivalent performance, or they might as well be selling like 10year old GPUs for £500
Soldato
Now that mining has all but died, the max selling price on the fastest consumer card has dropped to around $1200, and stock is still sitting on shelves.