And they'll still outsell AMD 100 to 1, even if AMD is faster
Nvidia won the eternal mindshare of the PC market long ago.
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA 4000 Series
- Thread starter MrClippy
- Start date
And they'll still outsell AMD 100 to 1, even if AMD is faster
Nvidia won the eternal mindshare of the PC market long ago.
Caporegime
And they'll still outsell AMD 100 to 1, even if AMD is faster
Nvidia won the eternal mindshare of the PC market long ago.
yeah...
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2011
- Posts
- 8,564
And they'll still outsell AMD 100 to 1, even if AMD is faster
Nvidia won the eternal mindshare of the PC market long ago.
And this is why AMD don't give a **** about the PC GPU market.
Caporegime
I think they are pretty jaded but have not completely given up on it yet, but one thing is for sure, they aren't going to keep spending this level of R&D on products that don't matter to their mindshare, market share and don't really sell in numbers that matter.
I think they were quite happy just making mid range Polaris GPU's, they sold well, didn't cost much to develop and reviewers weren't overly critical of them when they didn't beat Nvidia in every measurable way at half the price.
Last edited:
Associate
Totally forgot about Portal. Definitely be playing that too.
Associate
And they'll still outsell AMD 100 to 1, even if AMD is faster
Nvidia won the eternal mindshare of the PC market long ago.
TBF we could have said that about Intel a few years ago.
Thankfully Ryzen came along and has gone from strength to strength. Over the years AMD has proved itself more and more competitive against Intel's offerings and is now pricing 7000 chips accordingly.
Last edited:
Caporegime
7950X and 7900X are ok but 7700X and 7600X are definitely overpriced.
Associate
Guess they're following Nvidias lead and making the top end more attractive.
Caporegime
Nvidia have already taken that to the next level and given very mid range GPU's a high end naming scheme.
Associate
Nvidia really are the Apple of the GPU world.
Intel's 12th gen is still faster in single thread. 13th gen launches on the 20th, AMD are back to losing in the CPU market too, though not as badly as the Bulldozer days.
Last edited:
Associate
Yeah. I think they did ok for a while while Intel were asleep at the wheel giving us 5% IPC year on year.
Bulldozer... what a letdown that was.
Associate
whats frightening is intel is still delivering competitive products using an inferior process node.. if gelsinger is able to get intel fabs around tsmc envelopes, intel will back at its killing best
also, the amd x670 motherboard stunt was a big letdown, but such is the reality of pc gaming, we just got to reconcile with the way things are going
also, the amd x670 motherboard stunt was a big letdown, but such is the reality of pc gaming, we just got to reconcile with the way things are going
Last edited:
phoar, keep talking dirty to me baby
Worms Armageddon!
Yeah, AMD need to be a node ahead to stand a chance, performance wise.
Caporegime
AMD are so far ahead of Intel in Datacentre its not even funny. Like 3 generations at least.
This is a lack of trying.
Last edited:
Caporegime
A 24 core Zen 4 would score 52,000 in R23 at 200 watts.
Not-Even-Trying.
That's the problem.
Not-Even-Trying.
That's the problem.
Last edited:
Intel 24P core on Intel 4 would score 80,000, while being powered off.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2020
- Posts
- 306
Three days to go! Today I swapped out my ROG Thor 850w for the 1200w version and added another 4tb of ultrafast m.2 SSD to my rig. Keeping this thing bleeding edge is fun. And expensive.
Last edited: