There's practically no chance of any big GPUs on TSMC 20nm in Q1 next year. Q3 is realistic, Q2 possible.
We'll see in Feb
![Wink ;) ;)](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/wink.gif)
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
There's practically no chance of any big GPUs on TSMC 20nm in Q1 next year. Q3 is realistic, Q2 possible.
Originally Posted by Boomstick777
I'm done with multi GPU setups. Just gonna go for the best single card each time. At the mo it's Titan Black, if these new cards are significantly faster I would consider switching, but price etc will come into it.
Maybe at 1080, which begs the question why you have a Black![]()
just looking at GK110, Tesla was November vs February for Titan so I guess Feb 2015 is possible if they release/announce a new Tesla by Q4.
In fact, depending on what competition they have by then, they might well release a Titan before they have fulfilled all their Tesla for supercomputers but price it so high it won't sell much. In other words, a spoiler launch if AMD releases a large 20nm die by then.
Maxwell all taped out, full fat confirmed to be on 28nm!!
Yep. Unless I'm misinterpreting it.
Why do you have the Ti pegged as having substantially less cores than Titan Ultra?
They can just hobble DP performance to avoid cannibalising sales like they have done previously.
Pirate Islands coming Q2 2015 apparently, probably going to be 390X vs Titan Ultra then. It will look bad having a £1200* card either trading blows with or beaten by a ~£500 card so I think 880Ti would be put out with full fat and hobbled DP to be sold at a competitive price against the 390X.
Of course this is all wiiiiild speculation on my part.![]()
*projected price
I've heard this a couple time, but what incentive is there for either company to lower prices?
The genie is out of the bottle. They know now that they can sell cards from £700 to £3000. They know they can sell mid-range cards for £250. At today's prices we keep being told that cards are flying off the shelves.
So why would they reduce prices?
Maxwell core is obviously much more power efficient than Kepler, thus the next flagship will most likely have less cores than full GK110 processor. This has not happened before.
Would make far more sense based on the currently known information to have a round of GM204 on 28nm (the 750 must have been done for some reason as they wouldn't have done that lightly due to the whole lithography deal) then the full fat GK110 replacement on 16nm (due to the whole bitching about 20nm and full fat Maxwell suitability).
Products manufactured using 16nm FinFET+ will offer up to 40 per cent speed improvement over chips made using 20nm technology.
Well some sources claim that nVidia was forced to rework the low and mid-range for 28nm as TSMC couldn't fit capacity for both the high end GPUs and the mid-range and below onto 20nm so they had to choose one or the other (in which case 20nm GPUs would start appearing early, really early, next year).
Its known nVidia was not happy at all with 20nm for the full fat Maxwell though - so it is (indeed) quite possible we'd see something like GTX880 - 28nm (Sept 2014), Titan - 20nm (Jan/Feb 2015), GTX980 (full fat Maxwell) - 16nm (2H 2015).
EDIT: Loads of edits as I've got a crappy cold and not making too much sense.
EDIT2: Given the tech they want to put on Pascal I'm not sure we'll see it before sub 16nm anyhow.
Either way we are still being effected and I am not only taking about 20nm being late to the party.
How's about nvidia releasing a 680 as a flagship card, due to the 7970 not being released at its best performance. Also the longer gaps between next gen releases. The 7970 was amds top card for way too long (nearly two years). The gtx580 was just a refresh of the gtx480 and that lasted way too long. IMO things have slowed down allot and prices especially from nvidia have got silly.
I can see why things have slowed right down as these companies can recoup more cash for each cycle instead of moving forward and eating up more r&d costs. Slowing the market down is intentional in my eyes.
Either way I just want new, fast top end tech and not the drip feeding we have been getting lately.![]()
***SNIP***
Now that we've passed into the second half of 2014, we should expect some new GPUs in the coming months. But what is more exciting, is what is coming in the first half of 2015 according to a new report from SemiAccurate.
Read more at http://www.tweaktown.com/news/38953...-its-geforce-gtx-990-in-early-2015/index.html
you are going off on a tangent of what i was trying to get across when replying to Broomsticks original post where he mentioned he was impressed by the progress in gpus over the last few years..
Yes I have to agree with the above tbh.. debate and argue by all means but don't make it personal.
Indeed.. came in here expecting big news after all the new posts!
GK104 may retire soon. 800 Series Incoming?
citing semiaccurate as a source (which sadly requires a paid subscription to access). They say that new 28nm based Nvidia GPUs will be made available starting in October of this year and will be using the GM204 GPU core with between 1920 to 2560 stream processing units. These GPUs are to be names as follows.
GeForce GTX 880 Ti
GeForce GTX 880
GeForce GTX 870
GeForce GTX 860
Dosent the 780ti have like 2800 shaders ? ( can't remember ) so why would the 880ti have 2500 ?
Think I'll be building a new pc in early September.
Really hope something happens by then.