Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
Lol... You came close but JediFragger beat you to the punch
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Lol... You came close but JediFragger beat you to the punch
Can I just ask, is there a huge difference in performance between the various 980's out there?
For example, what are the main real-world differences between the MSI GeForce GTX 980 OC "Reference Fan" and the MSI GeForce GTX 980 Gaming Edition??
I ran Firestrike on 3DMark basic edition. Surely I should be getting way more than an extra 1k points over a 290?
If not then I might as well get rid of it lol. Hardly worth paying nearly £200 more for that small increase O_O.
Edit: Less than 1k as it goes, just checked the results again.
R9 290 in my sig 10450, GTX980 11124. That seems pretty dire really.
What are your graphics and physics scores?
also what are your base clocks?
This GTX 980 running at stock: http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-255-EA&groupid=701&catid=1914&subcat=1812
and this R9 290 running at 1180 core/1500 memory: http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-344-SP&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=1752
The 290 scored: Graphics Score 12962, Physics Score 8747
The 980 scored: Graphics Score 14394 Physics Score 8810
Here are the links to the results:
980 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/6323252
290 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/5905455
I know my score would be higher with a better CPU, it's just that I expected the gap between the 2 to be much bigger.
Edit: CPU was at 4.4 for both tests.
Sorry my post above is a mess... eyes are rubbish this morning and edit function seems to be broke.
Any hope you get the gist
Base score http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4370093
1500 MHz score http://www.3dmark.com/fs/4375870
I'm having a problem running older (late 90s/early 00s) era games on my new 980 graphics powered. I've tried many things (changing graphics, sound, OS (Win7 vs Win8.1)) and they still crash randomly. I suspect it might be something up with the motherboard or RAM, as people with similar PCs have the games working fine!
Please, if you're running a PC similar to mine, see if the Need For Speed Hot Pursuit 2 demo will work for you or not (http://www.gamershell.com/download_110.shtml)?
Read up more on all the many (almost hilarious) trials I made, and the fuller list of games that crash for me (mostly racing games): http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=42736
I'm having a problem running older (late 90s/early 00s) era games on my new 980 graphics powered. I've tried many things (changing graphics, sound, OS (Win7 vs Win8.1)) and they still crash randomly. I suspect it might be something up with the motherboard or RAM, as people with similar PCs have the games working fine!
Please, if you're running a PC similar to mine, see if the Need For Speed Hot Pursuit 2 demo will work for you or not (http://www.gamershell.com/download_110.shtml)?
Read up more on all the many (almost hilarious) trials I made, and the fuller list of games that crash for me (mostly racing games): http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=42736
This seems to be a thing with me ATM
is your card reference clocked at 1126 Mhz ish or is it factory clocked at over 1200 Mhz?
I say this because I have issues running Elite dangerous at anything over 1200 MHz and wonder if you still get the problem if you down clock.
Anyone else having to lower clocks for BF4 and BFH ?? .. I get crashes all the time, although its fine on other software pushing its limits i.e. FC4