Unfortunately you don't have half an ounce of sense or the ability to read.
For a start our interest in Silva was confirmed by Benitez before the transfer window even opened and it was widely reported and more or less confirmed that we had an offer accepted for Tevez (Tevez claimed he couldn't join us out of loyalty to Utd).
Regarding the debt, had you read my reply to HangTime you would see that I said that afaik the club do not HAVE to sell anybody to pay off any debt. If this is the case then why would anybody sell a player and not replace them? As I said, the issue at Liverpool is that nobody has a clue what's going on behind the scenes and how much or where money is going.
edit: Also, as I said to HangTime, there's nothing I want more than the Yank leeches to **** off and their inability to pay-off debt would speed that process up; which would explain why I wouldn't want a player to be sold to pay-off debt even if that is where the money is going.
You really do talk crap, you said specifically that you started the summer BIDDING for TEVEZ AND SILVA, which I commented on. You had a go at me for not being able to read. Hm, then you say Benitez specifically said his interest was confirmed. Can you read the difference in the words BID and INTEREST FOR because I can. Benitez was interested in about 7000 different expensive players, as almost every manager in the world was, thats a far cry from bidding for players and almost buying them. AS for having an offer accepted for Tevez, which you now say was widely maybe reported and almost confirmed, but clearly not. You weren't in for Tevez, you may have put in a low bid, but I doubt even that.
Maybe someone spoke with Tevez's guys as said, do you want to come, thats probably as far as it went. The rumours are that Tevez was actually closer to 35million with insane wages, Liverpool would never in a million years even bid 35million for Tevez, let alone offer him wages above Gerrard and Torres.
The fact that you think otherwise suggests its you without an ounce of sense, nor the ability to read.
I really have no clue what the rest of your post is on about. You're in exactly the same situation as Utd, they've sold people and obviously put some of that money towards reducing the debt to reduce the interest, why wouldn't you do the same, just because you don't have to, doesn't mean its not the smart move. Considering Benitez's buying record why should your owners, at the cost of making a dent in the debt, risk money on expensive players who are very overpriced in the case of Silva and Tevez.
You seemed to ignore the fact Benitez MASSIVELY overpaid for an over rated English defender, I questioned the idea that Chelsea bumped the price in a bidding war, they have 2 better defenders and a backup, both of which can and have scored and are massively better defensively. Other than press talk I've seen no proof Chelsea were in for him, nor anyone else, so he doesn't have that excuse.
You've been talking about Utd fans not getting that when they sell they need to put some of that money towards the debt while UTd guys say, meh, we don't have to pay off that debt. Then you talk about not having to pay the debt so why can't you sell a player and buy another? Then you question me when I call you on it.
THe fact is your debt might be stable and you might not have to sell people to cover costs throught he year, that doesn't mean your debt is safe, small or that when your club does make some money it won't go on the debt. Theres hundreds of millions of debt, why for Utd does that mean their proceeds from sale should go on debt, when you do it, you should simply be able to reinvest. Its complete nonsense to see the two situations as different, but you do.
He moved because it was his dream club, the money they offered him is irrelevant.
