• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Official Ryzen Owners Thread ***

jaffveyda said:
That's 100 more than i ever benched. What settings have you used for CPU & RAM overclock?
Click to expand...

CPU is at 3.990GHz with 40x multi, voltage on 1.375v or less, and the SoC is at stock. RAM is running 3200MHz 14-13-13-13-24 or there abouts

It's only my test rig, so it doesn't get used much at all but when I am back in the lab, I'll look at it for further details. :)
 
Journey said:
CPU is at 3.990GHz with 40x multi, voltage on 1.375v or less, and the SoC is at stock. RAM is running 3200MHz 14-13-13-13-24 or there abouts

It's only my test rig, so it doesn't get used much at all but when I am back in the lab, I'll look at it for further details. :)
Click to expand...
You must have scored with CPU my one runs 3,8Ghz @1.37 and not a Hz more.
 
I can't check what this is as I'm still at work (I lag behind you guys over there), and I can't find any info on it... new MSI Tomahawk Beta Bios V1A1: https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=283344.msg1615503#msg1615503

Last beta bios name was v1.91... so the naming scheme change is interesting. Kinda hoping that it might be AGESA 1.0.0.7 related. (Unless they are just going with hexadecimal numbering, but I can't find any other example of them doing this).
 
Last edited:
Not sure if this has been discussed.

The NPT issue with Ryzen has been resolved, this is big news for those who planned to use ryzen with Unraid and other server based platforms.

-------------

I have identified the issue! With NPT enabled I am now getting near bare
metal performance with PCI pass through. The issue was with some stubs
that have not been properly implemented. I will clean my code up and
submit a patch shortly.

This is a 10 year old bug that has only become evident with the recent
ability to perform PCI pass-through with dedicated graphics cards. I
would expect this to improve performance across most workloads that use
AMD NPT.

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2017-October/024822.html

https://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=150891016802546&w=2
 
I know marketing and all that goes a long way but Ryzen would still of sold even if they didn't make it sound like an Intel lineup.

x370 vs Z370

1700 vs 7770k

etc etc etc...

The product would have sold it's self despite the name.

That's the entire point of a good product.
 
Skylake at 4.5ghz running AC Origins. 1080Ti bottlenecked even at 1440p using Max Settings.


My 1600X sometimes gets very close to 100% at 1440P, very high settings using a GTX 1080.

Something in the higher settings is hammering the CPU.
 
muon said:
Skylake at 4.5ghz running AC Origins. 1080Ti bottlenecked even at 1440p using Max Settings.


My 1600X sometimes gets very close to 100% at 1440P, very high settings using a GTX 1080.

Something in the higher settings is hammering the CPU.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure the Nvidia driver/API don't spread the load the CPU load very well.
 
Computerbase has a good quality review with more CPUs here: https://www.computerbase.de/2017-10/assassins-creed-origins-benchmark/3/
Ryzen seems to do pretty well in all fairness:
xXOp6WO.png
 
Zeed said:
Ryzen DRAM Calculator 0.9.7

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Byx_5So-FNsdZnJpWVczTkNFd2M/view?usp=sharing

* Developed anew tRRDL, tRRDS, tFAW for all calculators, built-in automatic conversion of nanoseconds from 2T mode to 1T (in case of incorrect reading SPD)
* HQ and Without XMP calculators were recycled from scratch for accuracy of prediction of all timings, symmetry conditions for timings were added for improved stability
* Increased the accuracy of the prediction of tRFC
* Added the "Additional stability" checkpoint for all calculators and ranks (2T mode)
* The editing of the syntax "procODT 68.8 -> 68.6" etc.
* Changed the sequence of input fields for a more convenient copy-paste with typhoon

p.s. thank you guys for helping test and write reviews
smile.gif
wubsmiley.gif
Click to expand...

Cheers, gonna give this a shot, see if can get 3466 working, think I did it correctly. Gave me a load of settings to try.....:)
 
I have officially joined the Ryzen owners club with a 1700 running on am asrock b350m itx board and some 16gb 8pack 3200 ram. :D

First impressions are great and I'm really pleased. *touch wood* I have not come across any major issues so far with the the ram posting 3200 out of the box (big up 8pack ram) and the bios/creators update going smoothly (took the opportunity to go to w10). :D

Got a stable oc of 3.7 on 1.2625 volts (still to tinker with) which I don't think isn't too bad on an itx board?

Only thing I have noticed is some stuttering when minimising/reopening league of legends mid game which I find odd, so if anyone has any ideas?
 
Kill_Phil said:
I have officially joined the Ryzen owners club with a 1700 running on am asrock b350m itx board and some 16gb 8pack 3200 ram. :D

First impressions are great and I'm really pleased. *touch wood* I have not come across any major issues so far with the the ram posting 3200 out of the box (big up 8pack ram) and the bios/creators update going smoothly (took the opportunity to go to w10). :D

Got a stable oc of 3.7 on 1.2625 volts (still to tinker with) which I don't think isn't too bad on an itx board?

Only thing I have noticed is some stuttering when minimising/reopening league of legends mid game which I find odd, so if anyone has any ideas?
Click to expand...

3.7Ghz with 1.26v seems decent. What motherboard did you get?
 
gavinh87 said:

I have not watched this video yet but I know Steve is liked around here.
Click to expand...

To be honest very little in it by all accounts.

I am very happy with my Ryzen 1600, gaming @ 1080 on a 75hz screen rock solid performance in BF1 for me. Seen a massive increase moving from the 8350 it replaced and also saved me money on the need to upgrade the 980 graphics card.

He did have some old pricing on the video so adjust to todays availability and prices the 1600 is still a great chip as long as your happy with +/- 10fps compared to the 8400.
 
i5 8400 seems to be a much better choice for gaming based on that video, it's faster than a 4Ghz R5 1600, which isn't something most R5 1600s can even reach at <1.425v.
You also don't need 3200Mhz B-die with the i5 8400, 2666Mhz DDR4 seems to suffice.

AMD needs to cut prices a bit.
 
AndreiD said:
i5 8400 seems to be a much better choice for gaming based on that video, it's faster than a 4Ghz R5 1600, which isn't something most R5 1600s can even reach at <1.425v.
You also don't need 3200Mhz B-die with the i5 8400, 2666Mhz DDR4 seems to suffice.

AMD needs to cut prices a bit.
Click to expand...

I'd agree with this, taking the 720p testing into account this means that future GPU's will perform better on the 8400.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom