• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Official Ryzen Owners Thread ***

Auto settings seem to be working, funnily enough. Testing 3466Mhz now and have got further than i did previously. Using the secondary/third timings of 2133Mhz with the 3466Mhz frequency. So far so good, now testing stability.
 
AMDMatt said:
Auto settings seem to be working, funnily enough. Testing 3466Mhz now and have got further than i did previously. Using the secondary/third timings of 2133Mhz with the 3466Mhz frequency. So far so good, now testing stability.
Click to expand...
i could not boot at 3333 no matter what but 3466 3600 working fine on previous bioses

3600cl18
c6a21e24_new.png
 
Well, seems I am good for 3.975ghz cpu and 3066 ram without much issue.

Cpu will do 4ghz without too much struggle, but thought I'd aim to keep it under 1.4v under load.

Just trying to lower voltages now.

That's pretty much all I wanted so I'm happy. I just hope don't run into random 'lose settings when restart' kind of issues.
 
What me and Matt want is dat vega gpu. 1 for me knowing Matt at least 2 :p

We found a bug with 3600 auto setting thar kills memory read speed gotra change 1 setting from auto 5 to manual 1.
 
Last edited:
Silent_Scone said:
Hi,

Biggest notable improvement in the latest update is 4 DIMM stability.

Stressapptest ran for 1 hour

v9945
[email protected]
4x8GB 3200 C14-14-14-39 1T

Probeit:
VCORE: 1.355
SOC: 1.1
DRAM 1.365
PLL 1.791

QGGmNHz.jpg
Click to expand...

Off topic from memory but the SV12 TFN sensor on the vcore seems to be quite accurate when compared to your dmm readings. (CH6 of course. )
 
Latency means nothing to ryzen it seems
3466 CL14 vs 3466 CL16
2609ag1.png


I seem to have a problem with 3600, its bootable but not stable enough to even bench let alone stability. Will take another look at this in the future.
 
Silent_Scone said:
3600 can be tough. It's blind luck with the auto rules for most users, but not all CPU will be able to do it, either
Click to expand...

Yeah, well I already know I have 2 1700's that are both lemons with regards to overclocking I suspect the IMC might be the same.
Stilt posted some interesting findings over OCN, I'll give those a play when I get a chance. This rig is going into storage for a few weeks whilst the room is being renovated :/
Damn women want the moon on a stick :p
 
My sample seems happy at 3333Mhz at 4.1Ghz with 14-14-14-14-34-1 and tight second and third timings.

I've been unable to get 3466Mhz fully stable even with the CPU at stock though despite a few attempts using various timings, voltages and other settings. The only thing I've yet to try is CL VDDP.
 
AMDMatt said:
My sample seems happy at 3333Mhz at 4.1Ghz with 14-14-14-14-34-1 and tight second and third timings.

I've been unable to get 3466Mhz fully stable even with the CPU at stock though despite a few attempts using various timings, voltages and other settings. The only thing I've yet to try is CL VDDP.
Click to expand...

I think once we go past 3200 we hit diminishing returns. What are you testing memory with?
For me Aida finds errors much quicker than anything else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom