Gallas will be 33 in August, a year's contract will basically take him to 34. Arsenal are a very well run club in terms of their finances so to criticise an aspect that they've got very right is a bit silly.
Yet we've paid Silvestre almost as much as Gallas, on a two year contract no less while over 30, not including transfer fee and signing on bonus, for a player who rides the bench?
Yet paying Gallas THE SAME AS HE'S ON NOW, for 2 years, when he's shown no drop in form, when CB's are often their best at 30+, when the way he's playing this season suggests he's got several years left.
How will the finances be better, to lose Gallas because we won't CONTINUE TO PAY HIM THE SAME MONEY, when he's one of the best players in the team, and pay 10mil for another Vermaelen on 40-50k a week?
It will COST LESS TO KEEP HIM, and cost more to buy someone new in, who most likely won't be as good.
We're throwing money down the drain on Eduardo, Theo, Diaby, Denilson, players who shouldn't be at the club or should be being played. We've got 5 strikers, yet play 1, a 2nd if everyones injured and we're getting another guy in on 50k a week to, ride the bench. So we can afford to keep one more striker on the bench for 50k a week more, but we can't afford to keep paying Gallas the same money he's currently getting?
Utter rubbish, Arsenal could be wasting a lot less cash and getting a lot more for their money.
Why are Arsenals finances great? We charge double what most teams in the premiership charge for tickets, and we have by FAR the largest stadium in London, we both charge more than Chelsea and have not far off double the capacity. We have a lower capacity than Utd, but charge more for each ticket, we have far higher capacity than Liverpool and charge way more per ticket.
Our finances are good, because we make money hand over fist, not because of our absolutely stupid over 30's policy. Its NOTHING more than Wenger wanting to win the title with a young cheap squad so he can say "look how I won it, we're better than you , ha ha" .
Again, Gallas wants the SAME money he's on, to do the SAME job he's doing, he's far more than capable of producing the same quality for 2 more years. Giggs is making more than Gallas, playing a lot less, is no where near as good(currently) and is far older.
Age should have nothing to do with it, theres entirely no reason AT ALL to believe he can't play for 3-4 more years, and no reason on earth he should take a paycut to do the SAME job he's doing now.
Theo's barely played, he's on an embarassing 60k a week, we're asking Gallas to play more, be more important, be much better but take a pay cut to match Theo's contract, I'd be god damned irate.
Even worse is calling his wage demands extravagant, not taking a paycut to do the same job he's doing, seriously..... extravagant?