Caporegime
I would genuinely worry for the defendant if 90% of the posters in this thread were ever allowed on a jury. It's incredible how almost all of you know what happened.
Would be the best conparison.
Happened in Pretoria as well. Probably the best comparison. Admittedly it seems quite a bit easier to understand how he thought that was a burglar. Although I wonder if those who doubt you'd check, would say he should have checked the his daughter was in the house first, especially considering it was her car...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/may/25/southafrica.rugbyunion
kd
I dont think we will ever know what really happened. He will probably get off for a technicality
the case is going Oscar's way, how the hell the defend team found out about the lead investigation own attempt murder case, that was dismissed 2 years ago, but re instated yesterday.
Its actually completely daft and sounds like he absolutely should have been done for murder. Someone driving away in a car means zero danger, he wasn't in any danger and opened fire on the person in the car for no other reason than harm. Even if it wasn't his daughter, its a freaking car, you don't kill someone over a car. Killing in self defence, or if you suspect your life may be in danger(even if it actually wasn't) is understandable, killing someone who poses zero threat is unforgiveable.
IF, and I don't care nor believe either way for the record, OScar is telling the truth, between his story and this guy shooting his own daughter, one deserves a pretty harsh sentence, Oscar would deserve some punishment. The shoot first ask questions later policy may be more standard in SA, and I can understand places with horrendous crime rates, but ultimately he's responsible for a death and had he been more careful and less reactionary, she wouldn't be dead(again assuming it was all an accident).
Maybe they just didn't look hard enough......
http://ewn.co.za/2013/02/21/EWN-Exclusive-Pistorius-case-investigator-faces-charges
Anyone with any common sense knows he's guilty.
Intending to shoot her specifically? Nope, not yet proven, so no one 'knows' that yet.
Guilty of what exactly? Shooting her? sure, the whole world knows that.
Intending to shoot her specifically? Nope, not yet proven, so no one 'knows' that yet.
The whole thing is turning into a circus - I couldn't believe the stuff about Botha this morning. Told my wife (who used to live in JB for about 15 years) she just said its typical of the police - corrupt and incompetent to the core.. Hmm.
The question I have is, looking at the layout of the house, why would a burglar walk past them sleeping, then lock themselves in the toilet?
Guilty of murdering her as she begged for her life.
You'd have to be mad to believe he thought it was an intruder behind a locked toilet door, within a larger bathroom, off the main bedroom, behind a front door, behind 24/7 security, on valetines day. Why valentines day? she was out till 2am, they argued (probably a jealousy thing), he raged, he shot her, she ran and hid, he shot her again.
I personally think you've got to be really, really gullible/sympathetic with the guy in order to believe his version of events
Proving it is all that matters though, and I don't think the corrupt, idiotic and woeful South African justice system can do that against a good defence team.