Host your own one if you have the spare hardware. I have spin up my own one on an Intel NUC with 16GB RAM and it seems fine. It’s pretty easy to set up and I’m not that savvy with command lines and all thatAnyone recommend a decent server host ? Shockbyte has been appalling - constant crashing etc. Going to get a refund
So tempted to give this a go! Son loves Pokémon so he would no doubt love this!
I wish they would improve Pal intelligence and give us something like Rimworld where you can prioritise job importance and also be able to set what resources go to which container, the other stuff sounds good though especially building, it's okay but it could be better with more options to position objects and the ability to simply move objects that are already built without having to delete them and rebuild
Roadmap for Early Access released.
Pokémon was the childhood for a lot of these adults, makes sense it would be those very same people still like it today.This is the kind of game that I could never play, purely because of how embarrassed I'd be if anyone saw me playing it
I do find it crazy how many adults are seriously into Pokemon (and yeah, this is such a blatant rip-off of that!)
Inquiries Regarding Other Companies’ Games
We have received many inquiries regarding another company’s game released in January 2024. We have not granted any permission for the use of Pokémon intellectual property or assets in that game. We intend to investigate and take appropriate measures to address any acts that infringe on intellectual property rights related to the Pokémon. We will continue to cherish and nurture each and every Pokémon and its world, and work to bring the world together through Pokémon in the future.
The Pokémon Company
Honestly hope nothing comes of it; if anything it's advertising for Pokemon and the overall vibe of the game is very different.他社ゲームに関するお問い合わせについて|株式会社ポケモン|The Pokémon Company
ポケモンという存在を通して、現実世界と仮想世界の両方を豊かにすること。株式会社ポケモンのコーポレートサイトです。corporate.pokemon.co.jp
So, it will be officially investigated. Let's see how this pans out and if Palworld is taken off sale at some point.
That's a completely different point though. The issue here, if there is one, is on the models of the Pokémon/ Pals, and whether Palworld has copied them or substantial elements thereof. If they have, it's copyright infringement, and completely right that they'd have to take the game off the market until they remove the infringing models, or pay a licence fee to Nintendo / TPC for use of those models.Honestly hope nothing comes of it; if anything it's advertising for Pokemon and the overall vibe of the game is very different.
If they feel threatened by it then they should try innovating a bit instead of holding the IP hostage with rubbish reskins.
Yea, I wonder how much the IP actually protects. Some things do look similar, but just because 2 things have plants on their heads, would that come into legal question? Not that that's the only thing that you could draw similarities from.That's a completely different point though. The issue here, if there is one, is on the models of the Pokémon/ Pals, and whether Palworld has copied them or substantial elements thereof. If they have, it's copyright infringement, and completely right that they'd have to take the game off the market until they remove the infringing models, or pay a licence fee to Nintendo / TPC for use of those models.
The "overall vibe of the game" would be unaffected by that, and is pretty much unprotectable - I'd be amazed if Nintendo did anything in relation to that. Any complaints they have will be with specific models, designs, and any other game elements copied from Pokémon.
他社ゲームに関するお問い合わせについて|株式会社ポケモン|The Pokémon Company
ポケモンという存在を通して、現実世界と仮想世界の両方を豊かにすること。株式会社ポケモンのコーポレートサイトです。corporate.pokemon.co.jp
So, it will be officially investigated. Let's see how this pans out and if Palworld is taken off sale at some point.
Yea, I wonder how much the IP actually protects. Some things do look similar, but just because 2 things have plants on their heads, would that come into legal question? Not that that's the only thing that you could draw similarities from.
It would be weird if there were any significant ruling as you'd assume the company did due diligence and are working around the necessary loopholes, otherwise their sales will mean nothing if they're sued into the ground.
Not specifically, although it raises an interesting point. There could be an argument that Nintendo's characters are insufficiently original to attract copyright protection in the first place (and if they don't attract copyright protection there can obviously be no infringement). I think this is a pretty weak argument though - the threshold for originality is very low, and I think it's likely that Nintendo's characters are sufficiently original over and above the Dragon Quest ones to attract copyright protection.I'm not sure if "but they did it first" will stand up as a legal defence, even if it might be a moral one