Pentagon releases UFO footage

They could be 10 million years advanced but they would still be bound by huge distances for drones and transporting a bag of bones at distances & speed
Put simply if Aliens 1000 light years away from us want to visit it will take them that long to get to us at light speed so goodbye to all their relatives.
It's more complex than that with Time Dilation etc but Angilion will be along to tell us exactly how long it would take Aliens a 1000 light years away to get here and then get back home.

I would suggest that any civilisation travelling the galaxy or beyond won't be using conventional engines to propel matter in a way that we understand as the energy requirements are infinite moving at c, they'll use some other form exotic travel to bend space or alter how matter interacts with space, there's plenty of theoretical explanations
 
Just reading the US whistleblower act.
The whistleblower protections and rewards part is very interesting, particularly when you introduce abstract concepts and almost impossible to disprove theoretical claims such as Inter dimensionality and ambiguous terms terms like non human biologics.
 
Last edited:
I would suggest that any civilisation travelling the galaxy or beyond won't be using conventional engines to propel matter in a way that we understand as the energy requirements are infinite moving at c, they'll use some other form exotic travel to bend space or alter how matter interacts with space, there's plenty of theoretical explanations

You don’t say. But if we take these claims as true these advanced beings and fantastic craft can’t land these things for toffee. Apparently they are just falling from the sky all over the world.
 
He is? Has he written any scientific papers?
Yes he is. He got a Bachelor of Science Degree, Physics, University of Pittsburgh.

Why stop there? Black hole engines (Event Horizon), warp drive etc. There are a lot of theories in science, all one has to do it back it up with evidence and change the world.
Why stop there? Because what I reported is what happened and going any further would be make believe. That's all the interdimensional talk was, a theory not backed up by evidence. Grush said so himself it was a theoretical discussion without evidence. It was never a claim of interdimensional aliens visiting. It was a theoretical discussion about physics.

Claims of heading an office that has been refuted and has since back peddled on. Questionable personality traits and checkered past. Doing interviews with his lawyer. Outrageous claims of aliens, murder and cover up’s. Held only the most junior officer rank. All very questionable to me.
Why do you lie so much and ignore facts? You know he did not only hold a most junior officer rank. In fact he was an extremely senior officer rank right at the top tasked with looking for illegal SAPs which he found. His job was to search for illegal SAPs which he found. But somehow this is questionable to you that he did his job well and found what he was sent to look for.

Its no wonder you think its all very questionable since you seem to be living off completely different facts from reality. You call a very senior person, junior. You see "aliens" all over the place when there are no refences to aliens. You see outrageous claims that are all made up in head when there are no outrageous claims being made in real life. Claiming he was head of office and back peddled is something you made up as far as I can see. Let me guess you cannot prove that as you made it up? In reality he was NRO Senior Officer.

The problem here isn't Grusch its 100% with you Jigger making things up that are not true.
 
Yes he is. He got a Bachelor of Science Degree, Physics, University of Pittsburgh.


Why stop there? Because what I reported is what happened and going any further would be make believe. That's all the interdimensional talk was, a theory not backed up by evidence. Grush said so himself it was a theoretical discussion without evidence. It was never a claim of interdimensional aliens visiting. It was a theoretical discussion about physics.


Why do you lie so much and ignore facts? You know he did not only hold a most junior officer rank. In fact he was an extremely senior officer rank right at the top tasked with looking for illegal SAPs which he found. His job was to search for illegal SAPs which he found. But somehow this is questionable to you that he did his job well and found what he was sent to look for.

Its no wonder you think its all very questionable since you seem to be living off completely different facts from reality. You call a very senior person, junior. You see "aliens" all over the place when there are no refences to aliens. You see outrageous claims that are all made up in head when there are no outrageous claims being made in real life. Claiming he was head of office and back peddled is something you made up as far as I can see. Let me guess you cannot prove that as you made it up? In reality he was NRO Senior Officer.

The problem here isn't Grusch its 100% with you Jigger making things up that are not true.

Because his claims of heading the office he claimed to work at is disputed by the office he cliamed to report to. Things like raise questions, when insinuating acts of things like murder.

Major is lowest officer rank. Let’s not go over this again…

Major Grusch in full swing and talking about what his senior offers apparently told him.

3:20s
 
Last edited:
Grusch said a lot of things… Outrageous claims have been made by a very questionable person and zero proof has been shown.

You dont know the guy. You cant say he is very questionable! Zero proof to the public yes. He has stated proof has been provided to congress etc.

We will have to wait to see if anything comes of the congress meeting.
 
Because his claims of heading the office he claimed to work at is disputed by the office he cliamed to report to. Things like raise questions, when insinuating acts of things like murder.

Major is lowest officer rank. Let’s not go over this again…

Major Grusch in full swing and talking about what his senior offers apparently told him.

3:20s
Well apparently we need to go over it again as you are incorrectly calling him junior. NRO Senior Intelligence Officer is not a junior role. Its even has Senior in the job title. Same for NGA Lead for UAP department he hold that position. Same for National Reconnaissance Officer another Senior role he hold. What about he role of Senior GEOINT Capabilities Requirements Officer. Your the one who is lying and calling all these roles junior. All these roles had access levels massively beyond what a typical Major had access to. So by saying he was only a Major and only Junior so he could not have access is just you being dishonest. How can you think a NRO Senior Intelligence Officer is not a Senior role?

Show me evidence of this dispute of him heading an office by the office he reported to. As his official government file shows Grusch was telling the truth and did work where he said he worked. Show me the evidence as you have a history of making things up so I want to see evidence. You have said this throughout this thread and never once posted any evidence and I cannot find any evidence.

PS that video you linked to called him a "high level Officer" directly opposite to junior officer that you called him. The video link also refers to documents and evidence something else you say isn't there. Well done you just disproven your own posts.
 
Well apparently we need to go over it again as you are incorrectly calling him junior. NRO Senior Intelligence Officer is not a junior role. Its even has Senior in the job title. Same for NGA Lead for UAP department he hold that position. Same for National Reconnaissance Officer another Senior role he hold. What about he role of Senior GEOINT Capabilities Requirements Officer. Your the one who is lying and calling all these roles junior. All these roles had access levels massively beyond what a typical Major had access to. So by saying he was only a Major and only Junior so he could not have access is just you being dishonest. How can you think a NRO Senior Intelligence Officer is not a Senior role?

Show me evidence of this dispute of him heading an office by the office he reported to. As his official government file shows Grusch was telling the truth and did work where he said he worked. Show me the evidence as you have a history of making things up so I want to see evidence. You have said this throughout this thread and never once posted any evidence and I cannot find any evidence.

PS that video you linked to called him a "high level Officer" directly opposite to junior officer that you called him. The video link also refers to documents and evidence something else you say isn't there. Well done you just disproven your own posts.

I think jigger just likes to dispute things that he has no real knowledge of going by his posts.....
 
Last edited:
We being the ufologists.

An under oath means the person believed what they are saying to be the truth, it's not necessary actual truth, that would require some evidence.
He did more then just go under oath. Behind closed doors he spent 11 ish hours handing over documents, giving dates, details, projects, people involved, locations, evidence. Plus Congress took a field trip to see some of the evidence first hand themselves and said the evidence is real.
 
You dont know the guy. You cant say he is very questionable! Zero proof to the public yes. He has stated proof has been provided to congress etc.

We will have to wait to see if anything comes of the congress meeting.

Grusch was refused access to something, so his security clearance was limited or he would have had direct access.
Grusch states (himself) his evidence is based on hearsay and documents handed to him from his superiors, that he himself has no way to verify because of his clearance level, details of which that originated from third parties working at other agencies he has not been party to. Grusch has never laid eyes on the craft or beings he claims to be real and not single document, persons name, government program or company can be shown, because it’s classified. He couldn’t redacted a single document. You don’t find any of this questionable?

And his is just small part for why he is questionable.
 
Last edited:
Because his claims of heading the office he claimed to work at is disputed by the office he cliamed to report to. Things like raise questions, when insinuating acts of things like murder.

Major is lowest officer rank. Let’s not go over this again…

Major Grusch in full swing and talking about what his senior offers apparently told him.

3:20s

Because his claims of heading the office he claimed to work at is disputed by the office he cliamed to report to. Things like raise questions, when insinuating acts of things like murder.

Major is lowest officer rank. Let’s not go over this again…

Major Grusch in full swing and talking about what his senior offers apparently told him.

3:20s

You really should check your facts before posting old chap!
 
He did more then just go under oath. Behind closed doors he spent 11 ish hours handing over documents, giving dates, details, projects, people involved, locations, evidence. Plus Congress took a field trip to see some of the evidence first hand themselves and said the evidence is real.

Proves nothing. I can hand over documents for 11 hours.
 
Grusch was refused access to something, so his security clearance was limited or he would have had direct access.
Grusch states (himself) his evidence is based on hearsay and documents handed to him from his superiors, that he himself has no way to verify because of his clearance level, details of which that originated from third parties working at other agencies, he has not been party to. Grusch has never laid eyes of the craft or beings claims to real and not single document, persons name, government program or company can be shown, because it’s classified. He could redacted a single document. You don’t find any of this questionable?

And his is just small part for why he is questionable.

If you saw the congress meeting you will have noticed that he said he had evidence and had submitted it. We dont know what the evidence is do we?

He has many people backing up his story. Its for congress to get to the bottom if it.

I am open minded about it all to be honest. I cant pounce on him like you do because i dont know the guy.
 
Back
Top Bottom