Pentagon releases UFO footage

I am convinced they are made from real body parts and they appear to be 1000+ year old as that is was the Scientific data shows and what all the Scientists have said who have had direct access to the bodies. Do you not agree with them? If you don't agree, why don't you agree with the Scientific data?

Because your list of scientists who have seen and vouch for the data is a bit small. There are around 8 million scientists in the world and most of them are saying 'lol'.

Phrases like 'who have been able to access them' rings alarm bells. Why can't the whole world see this? Science should be open and available, if it's not it's not science.

This is real science below, hope that we have found some evidence for life elsewhere in the universe. All of science remains highly sceptical, because to not be wouldn't make a very good scientist.


 
Last edited:
The fact they can be carbon dated as 1000 years old does not mean they can’t be fakes. They can simply be 1000 year old fakes.

"OMG THERE'S DNA, YOU CAN'T DENY IT! THERE'S ACTUAL X-RAYS AND DNA, AND CT SCANS AND PICTURES, AND THERE'S DNA"

Did anyone actually see the scientist extract the DNA from the sample...............?

Did anyone actually see the scientist place the same sample from the comedy show hearing, into the x-ray machine...........?
 
“Phrases like 'who have been able to access them' rings alarm bells. Why can't the whole world see this? Science should be open and available, if it's not it's not science.”
People from the University of St. Petersburg, a University in Canada, the guy who is the esteemed position of Head of the Department of Legal and Forensic Medicine within the Mexican Navy and Adjunct Professor at both the National School of Anthropology and History and the University of London. Around a dozen company’s two of which are DNA specialists, along with Radiologists and Biologists. On top of this the Scientific data was openly punished almost 50GB of data plus all the DNA, MIR scans, carbon dating, all the test results from the different companies and university’s was published. You can download the full DNA profile and go over it yourself as well as the carbon dating data and rest of the data. But apparently you still won’t believe the science.


“ There are around 8 million scientists in the world and most of them are saying 'lol'.”
As the video and article links posted before shows the scientists going “lol” are wrong and posted factually incorrect science for there reasoning. Which is what happens when you decided what you want to see before looking at real Scientific data or looking directly at the bodies.

You always ask for Scientific data posted by respectable experienced Scientists and then when its given to you. What happens? You dismiss it because you don’t like what you are seeing. The DNA result for the adult body was clear, I don't see what your problem with that is.

The fact they can be carbon dated as 1000 years old does not mean they can’t be fakes. They can simply be 1000 year old fakes.
That might make then culturally significance and worth while to investegate given the age and where they where found. It could well be the family was buried like that for religious regions (just an idea, I cannot prove this). They do appear to be a family unit. The bodies where found in the right location and timeframe to be from around the end of the Nazca Culture. The bodies have deformed skulls and cranial manipulation. Both of which along with elongated skills was practised by the Nazca. Everyone is so quick to say these are fakes. But what they they are real bones from the Nazca Culture and the deformities was done by the Nazca which is something they practiced. Which means they might be an archology find related to that culture. Not something to dismiss as nonsense. At least for the adults the DNA and carbon testing seems to confirm this.

"OMG THERE'S DNA, YOU CAN'T DENY IT! THERE'S ACTUAL X-RAYS AND DNA, AND CT SCANS AND PICTURES, AND THERE'S DNA"

Did anyone actually see the scientist extract the DNA from the sample...............?

Did anyone actually see the scientist place the same sample from the comedy show hearing, into the x-ray machine...........?
You sound like your in denial that you silly idea was proven wrong about them being modern clay models. You don't seem to like the fact they are real bodies.

Two different respected DNA specialist companies did the DNA tests. Two different respected University's did tests themselves. The Forensic Doctor who did the examination holds an esteemed position and also works at both the National School of Anthropology and History and the University of London. CAT scan results like was shown cannot be faked. Same for the biological data is cannot be faked as in its real biological data. Those are real cat scans which alone is enough to prove they are real bodies. Real Radiologists and Biologists examined the bodies.

You call it a comedy show but did you even watch it? Did you even know about the adult 1.6 meter bodies? Why are you questioning the DNA results that show the adult is human? I bet you never even watched it as you seem to have a habit of jumping to faulty conclusions as you decide what you want to see then stick to that no matter what the evidence shows. From what I have seen the highly respected top of his field forensic doctor did a proper examination and never once mentioned aliens. He followed a proper Scientific detailed examination. Like I asked @jigger where is the evidence the Forensic Doctor who examined the bodies called them Aliens? I watched it and cannot find it. If the Forensic Doctor didn't call them aliens why is it a comedy show? EDIT: If I watched a poor translation and the Forensic Doctor did say Alien I would like to see the quote and context. So far neither of you can provide the quote so I don't think it happened.

EDIT: What's more likely its a modem day hoax and they created 20 fake bodies full of real body parts and testing show the body parts are all 1000+ years old and the fakes are so good it can fool a MRI scan which is impossible to do as far as I am aware. Or there is the simple solution its a real Nazca burial ground with a few animal bones mixed in.
 
Last edited:
papermachealiens.jpg

Needs more alien.
 
Lots of stuff that sounds like you're saying they are Aliens but actually you're not

I think your problem is you come over has somebody who believes in the slightest evidence of Aliens & UFOs even though you say over and over again that you don't.
You've said time and time again that the Navy films are not Alien and these bodies are human with a few animal bones thrown in but posters don't see that, they see you arguing the exact opposite.
Perhaps you should reply with a a disclaimer first eg
I POTTSEY DO NOT BELIEVE THE MEXICAN BODIES ARE ALIEN ALL THE DATA SHOWS THEM TO BE HUMAN.
ALL THE SCIENTISTS/EXPERTS THAT I LIST IN A MINUTE ALL SAY THEY ARE HUMAN.
 
I think your problem is you come over has somebody who believes in the slightest evidence of Aliens & UFOs even though you say over and over again that you don't.
You've said time and time again that the Navy films are not Alien and these bodies are human with a few animal bones thrown in but posters don't see that, they see you arguing the exact opposite.
Perhaps you should reply with a a disclaimer first eg
I POTTSEY DO NOT BELIEVE THE MEXICAN BODIES ARE ALIEN ALL THE DATA SHOWS THEM TO BE HUMAN.
ALL THE SCIENTISTS/EXPERTS THAT I LIST IN A MINUTE ALL SAY THEY ARE HUMAN.

Highly suspect people parading these types of things at alien events is unacceptable. Yet we still have some people defending and even encouraging this kind of behaviour.
 
I think technically Pottsey is saying he believes they are a mixture of human remains, with one ‘sample’ being human remains mixed with animal remains.

Further, I believe Pottsey has said one of the lead scientists (or whatever they were) stated the other ‘sample’ is ‘non-human’. This unfortunately is a very ambiguous term and in itself unhelpful. Does he mean non-human and thus mixed with animal remains, non-human and thus a species we don’t have a record that Co-existed 1000 years ago with Homo sapiens, or non-human therefore extraterrestrial.
 
To me, it doesn't really matter whether they're made from Clay, Silly-Putty, or a load of junk.

What matters is intent, and the intent of these people is to mislead people, with the almost certain intention of defrauding money out of them at some point.
 
Absolutely but Pottsey is saying they are human and has listed the scientists who say they are human.

The scientific evidence isn’t clear what these rings are. What we do know is the people behind these erm… curiosities, are full of crap and likely using scientific institutions to add some credibility to themselves.
 
The scientific evidence isn’t clear what these rings are. What we do know is the people behind these erm… curiosities, are full of crap and likely using scientific institutions to add some credibility to themselves.

and I'm pretty sure Pottsey is saying exactly the same thing, it's just that he writes so many words he makes people think he's sticking up for the charlatans.
 
I think technically Pottsey is saying he believes they are a mixture of human remains, with one ‘sample’ being human remains mixed with animal remains.

Further, I believe Pottsey has said one of the lead scientists (or whatever they were) stated the other ‘sample’ is ‘non-human’. This unfortunately is a very ambiguous term and in itself unhelpful. Does he mean non-human and thus mixed with animal remains, non-human and thus a species we don’t have a record that Co-existed 1000 years ago with Homo sapiens, or non-human therefore extraterrestrial.
I think your problem is you come over has somebody who believes in the slightest evidence of Aliens & UFOs even though you say over and over again that you don't.
You've said time and time again that the Navy films are not Alien and these bodies are human with a few animal bones thrown in but posters don't see that, they see you arguing the exact opposite.
Perhaps you should reply with a a disclaimer first eg
I POTTSEY DO NOT BELIEVE THE MEXICAN BODIES ARE ALIEN ALL THE DATA SHOWS THEM TO BE HUMAN.
ALL THE SCIENTISTS/EXPERTS THAT I LIST IN A MINUTE ALL SAY THEY ARE HUMAN.
That is correct and I am glad someone understands. The adult body came back from DNA testing as conclusively human there is no question about that. The baby body came back at none human. The baby had something like 30% DNA corruption that was unreadable and appears to be mixed in with animal parts. Which seems to explains the none human DNA. Furthermore the Forensic Doctor who did the examination never once mentioned Aliens. The other oddities like cranial manipulation can be put down to the Nazca culture who practised elongated skulls.


Anway

NASA says it has debunked famous UFO video but scientists are skeptical​



However we all know that if you reverse the name NASA it means Flat Earth in Mongolian.
My main problem with that is NASA did the same thing as last time. They neglected the effects of wind speed and on that day when that video was taken there where strong 140 MPH winds which throws off the calculations and real speeds a fair bit. There is a big difference between being blown 100Mph with the wind and flying 50 MPH against 140MPH winds. To neglect wind speeds and direction in such strong winds condition's brings uncertainty to the results.
 
Last edited:
My main problem with that is NASA did the same thing as last time. They neglected the effects of wind speed and on that day when that video was taken there where strong 140 MPH winds which throws off the calculations and real speeds a fair bit. There is a big difference between being blown 100Mph with the wind and flying 50 MPH against 140MPH winds. To neglect wind speeds and direction in such strong winds condition's brings uncertainty to the results.
If NASA had straight-up decided they were alien spaceships, would you be criticising their calculations? Or would you be saying, "Look, the experts at NASA have said they're aliens! They're scientists and engineers and they have seen the data!"
 
If NASA had straight-up decided they were alien spaceships, would you be criticising their calculations? Or would you be saying, "Look, the experts at NASA have said they're aliens! They're scientists and engineers and they have seen the data!"
Of course I would criticise their calculation as its a valid criticism that could have a large impact on the outcome. Any proof of Alien spaceships needs to be water tight and without a doubt correct. The calculations NASA did is flawed and that brings uncertainty on the accuracy of the results.
 
Back
Top Bottom