Pentagon releases UFO footage

keyser van someone said:
If the object didn't exist then it wouldn't be possible to lock on to it. That's just another explanation.
Click to expand...
Saying it doesn't exist goes against the evidence. The footage is taken from a military platform with military sensors and the journalists investigating directly spoke to multiple military sources who confirmed its real.


keyser van someone said:
What does that mean?
Click to expand...
It means according to the reports the object either has some sort of stealth system running and/or some sort of ECM jamming to block certain types of military platforms from getting a lock. It also appears at least by the reports to be invisible to night vision but shows up in thermal indicating some sort of stealth system is trying to keep it hidden. In short is appears to be a technology based object with thermal and signature shielding.
 
Last edited:
The thing that makes me laugh about that video, (of the flying semen stain) is if you go to 00:13 the narrator says "It changes from white to black!" or whatever, you can see the damn contrast of the entire image changing at the same time the flying semen stain changes colour, because either the exposure is changing or somebody is altering the whole image.

How people think there's anything to this stuff, just baffles me :cry:

These things are clearly just being made up to get a load of clicks,
 
People still debate UFO's in this day and age? :cry:

We live in a world where there is for the first time in history billions of high quality cameras, literally everywhere, 1080p minimum, absolutely nothing goes unphotographed or unfilmed and yet STILL the only footage that is seemingly available of alien visitors is sketchy as heck and the lowest possible video or photos ever? :cry: I could literally do a better job on my phone looking out of a passenger plane window...........yet nothing !
 
keyser van someone said:
Tell me more about these journalists. Who are they, what other works have they published?
Click to expand...
If you are asking how reliable they are they have a long history of military source going directly to them as they keep their word and protect the sources. They have a history of given hints about things coming and being proven right like the military whistle-blowers before they were made public which means their sources are real. They sat in Congress at the major briefings and got called out by name for there work so clearly have connections.

Screeeech said:
The thing that makes me laugh about that video, (of the flying semen stain) is if you go to 00:13 the narrator says "It changes from white to black!" or whatever, you can see the damn contrast of the entire image changing at the same time the flying semen stain changes colour, because either the exposure is changing or somebody is altering the whole image.

How people think there's anything to this stuff, just baffles me :cry:

These things are clearly just being made up to get a load of clicks,
Click to expand...
The change in colour is part of the military thermal camera cycling though the temperature cross section. People think there's something to it as the guy has a history of military sources approaching him with real data that he and other investigative journalists verify from multiple military contacts and Congress personal. So I inclined to believe this is real military footage from a real military sensor platform. The object appears to be real and not a stain or mark on the lens that's clear for anyone to see. My bets are its showing up like it is as the object has some sort of thermal and signature shielding that is distorting the image.
 
Combat squirrel said:
People still debate UFO's in this day and age? :cry:

We live in a world where there is for the first time in history billions of high quality cameras, literally everywhere, 1080p minimum, absolutely nothing goes unphotographed or unfilmed and yet STILL the only footage that is seemingly available of alien visitors is sketchy as heck and the lowest possible video or photos ever? :cry: I could literally do a better job on my phone looking out of a passenger plane window...........yet nothing !
Click to expand...
The military are still on 240potato, apparently. But "everything is real".
 
Last edited:
Pottsey said:
If you are asking how reliable they are they have a long history of military source going directly to them as they keep their word and protect the sources. They have a history of given hints about things coming and being proven right like the military whistle-blowers before they were made public which means their sources are real. They sat in Congress at the major briefings and got called out by name for there work so clearly have connections.
Click to expand...
And their names are? And their list of previously published works are?
 
Pottsey said:
If you are asking how reliable they are they have a long history of military source going directly to them as they keep their word and protect the sources. They have a history of given hints about things coming and being proven right like the military whistle-blowers before they were made public which means their sources are real. They sat in Congress at the major briefings and got called out by name for there work so clearly have connections.


The change in colour is part of the military thermal camera cycling though the temperature cross section. People think there's something to it as the guy has a history of military sources approaching him with real data that he and other investigative journalists verify from multiple military contacts and Congress personal. So I inclined to believe this is real military footage from a real military sensor platform. The object appears to be real and not a stain or mark on the lens that's clear for anyone to see. My bets are its showing up like it is as the object has some sort of thermal and signature shielding that is distorting the image.
Click to expand...

Gawd - think you need to up the dosage tbh.
 
Mint8 said:
Gawd - think you need to up the dosage tbh.
Click to expand...
Well I think its a rival military drone with stealth technology over a sensitive military installation. But I guess that's too extreme for people like you who cannot imagine anything more then a balloon or bug on the screen despite it clearly not being either.
 
Last edited:
Pottsey said:
TMZ Presents
Click to expand...
From the people that brought you other quality journalism;
www.hulu.com

https://www.hulu.com/series/tmz-presents-johnny-vs-amber-from-love-to-hate-cca6729c-8d1d-4c81-b3c2-f00740eb844a

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard's relationship went from white-hot love to red-hot anger; highlights of the most gripping moments of the trial with interviews and reporting from the case that shocked the world.
www.hulu.com www.hulu.com
www.fox.com

FOX Broadcasting Company | Full Episodes, Shows, Schedule

Full Episodes, Clips and the latest information about all of your favorite FOX shows.
www.fox.com www.fox.com

TMZ PRESENTS: PRINCE, FATAL SECRETS​

Sounds good.
 
I'll be over here ;)

www.metabunk.org

Jellyfish UFO from TMZ's 'UFO Revolution'

Source: https://tubitv.com/movies/200044921/s01-e01-the-breakthrough Higher quality video: https://www.metabunk.org/f/Jellyfish 720p High.mov Video viewer: https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?sitch=video&video=Jellyfish [Updated with unredacted video] So, any hypotheses? I'd put balloon(s) at...
www.metabunk.org www.metabunk.org

Current contenders are balloon (classic) or flak/smoke (woo sexy), there is some thought that the background buildings more resembles the US/allies style bunkers.

 
Pottsey said:
The change in colour is part of the military thermal camera cycling though the temperature cross section. People think there's something to it as the guy has a history of military sources approaching him with real data that he and other investigative journalists verify from multiple military contacts and Congress personal. So I inclined to believe this is real military footage from a real military sensor platform. The object appears to be real and not a stain or mark on the lens that's clear for anyone to see. My bets are its showing up like it is as the object has some sort of thermal and signature shielding that is distorting the image.
Click to expand...

You're taking the **** aren't you, come on admit it :D

I mean, you link a video like that - but you're not at all concerned by the other videos on that channel, things like this:


I mean - this is obviously quality content being produced by an individual with a strong basis in scientific knowledge and discovery, of course...
 
keyser van someone said:
From the people that brought you other quality journalism;
www.hulu.com

https://www.hulu.com/series/tmz-presents-johnny-vs-amber-from-love-to-hate-cca6729c-8d1d-4c81-b3c2-f00740eb844a

Johnny Depp and Amber Heard's relationship went from white-hot love to red-hot anger; highlights of the most gripping moments of the trial with interviews and reporting from the case that shocked the world.
www.hulu.com www.hulu.com
www.fox.com

FOX Broadcasting Company | Full Episodes, Shows, Schedule

Full Episodes, Clips and the latest information about all of your favorite FOX shows.
www.fox.com www.fox.com

TMZ PRESENTS: PRINCE, FATAL SECRETS​

Sounds good.
Click to expand...
Assuming that's sarcasm. What is wrong with the quality of journalism in those? You seem to be saying they are poor quality. I haven't watched them so give me some examples. Did they get some journalism wrong? What is so poor about the journalism and what did they not do a very good job on? Or did you just pick some random stuff you liked the look off without bothering to do an real research? Even if they are poor journalism how is the production team behind those got anything to do with the production team behind the documentary I talked about? Was it the same journalists, was it the same producer? Was is the same team of people? If we look at the credits, is there any link between the documentary I linked to and the shows you are talking about? You say the same people, who are these same people involved in both?

If you have a problem with the documentary I linked to explain it. Rather then just deflect onto unrelated nonsense like you have been doing.

Screeeech said:
You're taking the **** aren't you, come on admit it :D

I mean, you link a video like that - but you're not at all concerned by the other videos on that channel, things like this:


I mean - this is obviously quality content being produced by an individual with a strong basis in scientific knowledge and discovery, of course...
Click to expand...
By your crazy nonsense logic we cannot watch Martin Luther King by Trevor McDonald historical figure on ITV and take is seriously because it’s on the same channel as Real Housewives or the Sex lives of College Girls. So no I am not concerned by the other videos on Tubitv who have a mix of sub categories aimed at different people. They have many high quality documentaries so I don't really see what your problem is. That’s just a poor deflection on your part as the bible video by Robert Breaker has absolutely nothing to do with Tubitv documentary I linked to, unless you know of a link I missed? I bet not though, more likely its just yet more nonsense you are posting. You say its on the same channel it not though is it? You made that up as part of one of your crazy fantasy storeys you are so well known for making up didn't you? Of course if I am wrong post me the link on Tubitv and I will apologize. But on a quick search I see no link as they are not on the same channel.

Instead of pointing out problems in the documentary I linked to you are just picking an unrelated random shows produced by completely different teams and different people on what look like completely different channel. Its a tactic you often do, you pick some random nonsense you made up and latch on that fake story you created to write off things you don't like. Just like you did with your made up crypto money story, made up cocaine bags and paper Mache and other such nonsense you are known for.

“I mean - this is obviously quality content being produced by an individual with a strong basis in scientific knowledge and discovery, of course...”
Has the person behind the Bible Prophecy got anything to do with the person behind the documentary I linked to? Is it the same producer, is it the same investigate journalists? Is it the same team of people? Asnwer is No, they are not even on the same channel. So you are just spreading your usually well-known BS.

https://tubitv.com/tv-shows/200044921/s01-e01-the-breakthrough is the documentary in question where the clip we are talking about came from. EDIT: Episode 2 is due tomorrow and Episode 3 is due Thursday.
 
Last edited:
Pottsey said:
Instead of pointing out problems in the documentary I linked to you are just picking an unrelated random shows produced by completely different teams and different people on what look like completely different channel. Its a tactic you often do, you pick some random nonsense you made up and latch on that fake story you created to write off things you don't like.
Click to expand...


rrDppB5.jpg
 
keyser van someone said:
That would be correct. Well I did ask twice who the journalists were and you didn't say, twice, so I've started to do my own research, so far I got this: TMZ is a celebrity and Hollywood gossip tabloid website owned by Fox Corporation.
Click to expand...
Well the links there for you with the full credits and I see no problem with the journalists or people involved in that documentary. I haven't watched the entire thing but from the bits I have seen its well put together. Its not on the Hollywood gossip tabloid website that I have seen rather its on Tubi AKA Tubeitv a channel that has 74 million monthly active users. I didn't give you a link directly because you posted the link yourself before I had chance, right at the top of your post in https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/pentagon-releases-ufo-footage.18885266/post-36887951 where you have source: https://tubitv.com/tv-shows/200044921/s01-e01-the-breakthrough so I have no idea how you linked that source then somehow got to celebrity and Hollywood gossip.

Did you even watch your own link which has the longer video with not only more content but higher quality? The one that 100% proves its not a stain and makes Screeech look more foolish then normal. 30seconds in when the tracking drone slowdown the object moves across the crosshair. If it was a strain it would always move with the crosshair staying relative to the crosshair movement. Instead of being relative not only does it move around the crosshair the object rotates along with changing its speed independent of the drones movements. Thats three things stains cannot do. Its all there in the extended video link you posted.

Even Mick West says the idea of a strain “does not make much sense.” And goes into detail way. In the thread you posted to. Also from that thread the object turns at least 20 degrees on the footage making is a real 3D object that is a distance from the platform filming. EDIT: Plus in the longer video they zoom in and out showing a changing depth again something a strain could not do.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom