Corbyn looked like he was going to cry at times when being questioned by Paxman.
It is one big negotiation. There is no such thing as breaking it into two by giving one side one thing just for the other side to be heard. We all know this is an attempt to weaken the hand of the other. It doesn't work like that and we already know that Labour and Conservatives won't entertain this upfront deal. We can unlock trade (even more than Singapore, Canada because our laws are aligned), make financial contributions on case by case basis (as other countries do) and not have free movement (like the rest of the world).What makes you think they will offer a good deal to may.
We all must know by now... any 'deal' put to us will be worse
And at this point in time... a deal cant even be talked about until May gets pushed over on the LEAVING terms first.... she hasnt got a leg to stand on
Someone who will roll over to the EU would be! The EU won't ever offer a good deal to someone that won't walk away. We are guaranteed a bad deal with Labour in charge.
He can't walk away. Pretty much rule number 1 in negotiating.Why would you think Corbyn would roll over? Because he hasn't uttered the words "strong and stable" yet?
Remember, Corbyn has always shown a healthy dose of euroscepticism - that may appeal to remainers and leavers alike.
Why would you think Corbyn would roll over? Because he hasn't uttered the words "strong and stable" yet?
Remember, Corbyn has always shown a healthy dose of euroscepticism - that may appeal to remainers and leavers alike.
Bold prediction: TM will be Prime Minister on June 9th, the Tories will have their majority. In-fighting and backstabbing will see her outed before 2019 is over.
Corbyn has just insisted while being interviewed by paxman that there will be a deal.
The only way he can say this is if he is willing to roll over.
indeed, this is pretty basic re: negotiations
people who don't get that perhaps are among the people who don't quite grasp that it isn't a good idea to say unilaterally guarantee rights for EU nationals in the UK without reciprocal rights in place for UK nationals in the EU
That is how the deal should be negotiated. Neither party should need to walk away from it. Good deals are win-win for both. This is how it will be played out. Both sides need to know the other is willing to walk away for this to happen. Without this there is a risk one side will get a bad deal.Nobody's walking away from the negotiations, both sides know this.
Do you genuinely think any of them would actually just walk away and not agree any sort of deal?Corbyn has just insisted while being interviewed by paxman that there will be a deal.
The only way he can say this is if he is willing to roll over.
indeed, this is pretty basic re: negotiations
people who don't get that perhaps are among the people who don't quite grasp that it isn't a good idea to say unilaterally guarantee rights for EU nationals in the UK without reciprocal rights in place for UK nationals in the EU
Corbyn has just insisted while being interviewed by paxman that there will be a deal.
The only way he can say this is if he is willing to roll over.
Do you genuinely think any of them would actually just walk away and not agree any sort of deal?
Some of them might say it but I don't believe it for a moment.
That's not the question I asked.Surely it depends on what is on offer.
If the eu sat there and demanded £100bn or more agreed before even starting discussing a trade deal, with no linking of the two, then walking away is better than agreeing, because you have a choice of no trade deal, or probably no trade deal and paying 100bn.
The only thing that controls such stupidity in negotiation is the willingness of parties to walk away.