Excuse me, I only posted on here.
** POTENTIALLY THE BEST GAMING MONITORS YET!! ** Acer 34" Ultra-wides
- Thread starter Gibbo
- Start date
Excuse me, I only posted on here.
Ever thought that might not be me?
This name is quite popular and hard to get in many places.
Says the user was last online 6 mins ago
With billions of people in the world?
Could we stop arguing now, due to you lack of evidence.
Says the user was last online 6 mins ago
Its him.
Hes the only one downplaying Acer and says Asus is better.
Excuse me, where did I say ASUS is better in my comment, you might want to read it again
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,845
If you were from Asus, you'd have no right to talk about ****** QC anyhow!! The original RoG Swift had close to zero itself!!
If you were from Asus, you'd have no right to talk about ****** QC anyhow!! The original RoG Swift had close to zero itself!!
Associate
Has anyone had issues setting 100 HZ in Nvidia Control Panel. My screen allows me to overclock on the OSD to 100 Hz but when I look in the Nvidia control panel there is only up as far as 95 Hz
I have seen some people say their screen has issues like flickering at 100 Hz and they need to drop to 95 but I cant even select 100 Hz. Has anyone else come across this?
I am using SLI GTX 670's and Nvidia driver 358.59
I have seen some people say their screen has issues like flickering at 100 Hz and they need to drop to 95 but I cant even select 100 Hz. Has anyone else come across this?
I am using SLI GTX 670's and Nvidia driver 358.59
Soldato
That's probably card limitation and maybe something to do with the bandwidth available on the v1.2 DP on the GTX 670. I posted earlier in the thread having found exactly the same result on a GTX 670 I have in a secondary PC. On my 980 Ti it allows the full 100Hz. Same monitor obviously.
Last edited:
Soldato
Soldato
From my experience with my "cheap" korean 40" VA UHD panel I've noticed the BLB can be affected and indeed improved by applying very slight pressure right in the corner tip.
On my other panel it was common practice to adjust the case screws to even out the BLB and also the initial displays came with tempered glass which had bad reflections. That was easily cured with a heat gun and credit card to remove the glass to reveal a matt VA panel behind. There are now version without the glass as a result of feed back.
On my other panel it was common practice to adjust the case screws to even out the BLB and also the initial displays came with tempered glass which had bad reflections. That was easily cured with a heat gun and credit card to remove the glass to reveal a matt VA panel behind. There are now version without the glass as a result of feed back.
Nothing is immune from BLB... just some panels suffer more than others. I've seen plenty of TV's with VA panels that suffer really badly from BLB. PC monitors seem to fair better though.
Soldato
As above all the LCD/LED panels suffer BLB as they all have back lights. OLED & Plasma have self emitting pixels/cells or whatever you call the sub pixel element.
IPS has IPS Glow and VA has gamma shift which is more to do with viewing angles affected by the liquid crystal sub matrix and polarizing masks.
Sod it this link explains the panel much better then I can.
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/specs.htm
IPS has IPS Glow and VA has gamma shift which is more to do with viewing angles affected by the liquid crystal sub matrix and polarizing masks.
Sod it this link explains the panel much better then I can.
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/specs.htm
Associate
Thanks bimbleuk. Very interesting. Perhaps that is my problem then but it seems strange as it is the same DP 1.2 on the newer cards.
