Ah, I see. Ok, all makes sense now.
Nobody can disagree with your post. It's a fact. He HAS gone from further than that before and won.
I'd agree with xdcx though, it's a completely pointless fact. The conditions were different, the race was different, the leadout was different. So just because he has sprinted from further before doesnt mean he didnt go too early this time.
The fact that he died before the line somewhat proves that he did indeed go too early.
Look, I understand that and I am genuinely not being argumentative (for a change), I just don't see it the same way.
Look at it this way, Sagan got a puncture, was miles behind, got back on like a Warrior and STILL beat Cav to the line. Now if he can do that (and he must have been utterly drained trying to catch up on his own), you can't tell me Cav couldn't have done better? Or perhaps that's the issue. He can't. I am still mentally comparing 'Old Cav' to 'New Cav' and they aren't the same.
I have been mulling it over and what I find worrying is that even when Cav committed to the sprint he wasn't pulling anything out of Greipel on his wheel. The other Pro sprinters always says they get no benefit of being on his wheel because he is so short and so close to the bars, yet Greipel maintained contact then came past him.
Argh! Two days in and my emotions are all over the place already - not good.
Look, I understand that and I am genuinely not being argumentative (for a change), I just don't see it the same way.
I dont really understand what you're saying. If you dont think he went too early and timed his sprint well, then you must think that he just isnt as fast as the others?
As I've been saying throughout this thread, I dont think Cav is the fastest sprinter in the race this year. But I do think he mistimed his sprint and can do better.
EDIT - also getting questioned on Kristoff above. Yep, Kristoff. People all putting down pure climbers to win, yes it's step but the climbers are 50/50 to get there first. This is a odd and hard stage so lets see how it pans out till nearer the bottom of the Mur before even remotely deciding which prediction will be likely.
I think it's too short for a pure climber to win but too long for a pure sprinter to win. There's no recovery time over the top, so you need to be in the top10 over the climb to have any chance of winning.
It needs somebody who can power up a short climb, like Valverde, Sagan, Gerrans, Rodriguez.
There's also a narrow, technical run in to the bottom of the climb, so also somebody who can get in the right place at the right time. Maybe Gerraint Thomas as an outside bet? He's great at moving about in the bunch and getting in the right place.
Not sure what's going on with paddypower's odds? I got Sagan at 50:1 last night and now he's at 10:1! Did something change overnight or just lots of others taking up the same bet?
Also picked up Cancellara at 100:1.
Kristoff ain't a climber or a pure sprinter, he's just 100% bad ass and this is why I mention him. Like you say it is too short and flat leadup for pure climbers to be in the mix to attack it I think, although can't rule that out, teams may get their climbers there but I don't think that will happen. IT's the beauty of this stage though!
I picked Sagan for a win today in earlier post, Paddy Power obviously seen this and have adjusted their odds, it's the only explanation!
Anyone see the mechanic leaning out the window at 31mph to clear that fellas cassette? Fantastic stuff
Someone's smashed their face in and at least two cameramen are a metre away taking as many photos as possible. Classy.