Project 'sillyteg'

It would never pass MOT in a million years though. I'm supprised that after all this work you are only planning to use it on the road anyway, I would have thought you would have tracked it a couple of times at least. There is no way in hell that a screamer like that is going to pass noise regulations :(
 
Of course it'll be tracked, mainly at Castle Combe where they rarely have drive-by noise testing, and the wastegate won't open during a static test so it should be fine. Besides, it's only a 38mm wastegate, 38mm screamers aren't that loud.

As for the MOT, that depends on how friendly the tester is ;)
 
I'll vote 'no' on the screamer pipe coming out the bodywork dude, I know its 'sillyteg' but its a bit tasteless IMO. If you must have it, make it subtle yet potent ;)
 
Cos its not JDM bling?

Er, not really no. This isn't Japanese:

2993436040102890423S600x600Q85.jpg


How much was the ebay manifold?
 
Ramhorns are awesome but I didn't want to lose my A/C and P/S. My manifold is an exact copy of the Blox cast manifold (which is proven to work well), but only cost me ~£100 shipped.

Cast manifolds aren't pretty, but they work, and give better spool characteristics than tubular manifolds. Sure, they don't ultimately give as much top-end power as a tubular items, but you can get over that by turning up the boost ;)
 
Why do they give better spool characteristics?

The energy of the exhaust gases (flow and heat) are contained better.

If you use a tubular manifold, you lose temperature and the longer primaries slow the gases, giving them less energy when they hit the turbo.

*n
 
It would never pass MOT in a million years though.

Why not?

I know a guy who had a turbocharged Hillman Imp.

The exhaust was literally 8" long, came straight off the turbo and exited through the boot lid. The screamer ran parrallel to it.

That passed fine.

*n
 
The energy of the exhaust gases (flow and heat) are contained better.

If you use a tubular manifold, you lose temperature and the longer primaries slow the gases, giving them less energy when they hit the turbo.

*n

By how much though, an actual noticable measurable amount?

Just not able to heatwrap it to get around this if it is a problem?
 
By how much though, an actual noticable measurable amount?
Yes.

Just not able to heatwrap it to get around this if it is a problem?

Heatwrapping would keep the temps up but they'd still drop as they travel along the manifold.

The gases will also slow as they travel along the manifold; wrapping the primaries wouldn't help here.

Ultimately, you want the distance between turbo and engine (on both hot and cold sides) to be as short as possible.

*n
 
By how much though, an actual noticable measurable amount?

Just not able to heatwrap it to get around this if it is a problem?

As penski said, it's not just about heat, it's about distance and total volume to fill before the gasses hit the turbine. In a small cast manifold the gasses have bugger-all distance and volume to fill before they hit the turbine.
 
The energy of the exhaust gases (flow and heat) are contained better.

If you use a tubular manifold, you lose temperature and the longer primaries slow the gases, giving them less energy when they hit the turbo.

*n

Wow, youve changed your side on that one and sounds pretty similar to what i posted a while back :p

Yes those ramhorns things are total overkill for anything used on a road more than once a month. Minimal volume is far more preferable for anything involving transient engine load, not a 11 second 'pull' at a drag strip.

Tim, i know its not JDM, just wanted to understand the reasoning why you were'nt sure, the bling factor was the only reason I could think of. Turboing Hondas in Japan isnt as influential on the UK market anyway due to the language barriers compared to the huge market in the states.
 
Last edited:
Wow, youve changed your side on that one and sounds pretty similar to what i posted a while back :p

Yes those ramhorns things are total overkill for anything used on a road more than once a month. Minimal volume is far more preferable for anything involving transient engine load, not a 11 second 'pull' at a drag strip.

Are you now saying I was right in this thread and it is in fact you who has changed sides...

:/

*n
 
Its a bit different when your comparing bike engines in a kit car to a road focus'd VTEC car. Preferable means you can based either choice on what you require, lag is agricultural traction control for a little RWD i guess.

Just those VTEC ramhorn things are massive, and the amount of heat in the engine bay is a big concern IMO. Not an issue on that kit car.

I must have got confused and not got confused, seems youve always been an advocate of a log manifold. Turbos work on pressure mainly rather than airflow... unless you have bike cams :p

That blox item is pretty good, central WG, high Nickel cast iron made at the same place they do the Nissan manifolds.
 
Back
Top Bottom