The Queen will now miss the Remembrance Sunday service with a sprained back.
Not looking good.
The Queen will now miss the Remembrance Sunday service with a sprained back.
It would be so wrong if the RF smiled and laughed through this.So sorry for the Queen.
I know duringRemembrance Sunday the RF never look happy but they Charles looked like he was about to cry.
Well thankyou Dr Quartz, I'm sure the Queen will be devastated by your diagnosis though, so please break it to her gently.I fear she will not see out the year, let alone celebrate her jubilee.
I noticed it was mentioned about the Queens absense.
How does one sprain their back? Does it mean, pull a muscle?
Could have tripped over a corgi, slipped upon leaving bath or shower.I'm guessing she had a fall of some sort.
If the Queen passes on before jubilee, do you think those dates should be celebrated to mark the longest British reign? She has surpassed Victoria’s reign by 6 years and two months now.I fear she will not see out the year, let alone celebrate her jubilee.
Yawn.why would anyone celebrate a mafia type family who came to power with violence and force then rule over the population like monsters for hundreds of years..
if only the kray twins or some other family had been born a few hundred years earlier, we could celebrate them instead
you think the royal family are better than someone like pablo escobar? they are the same kind of people.
just they legitimised themselves and created a monopoly no one can break.
worried about someone with probably the best healthcare in the world, thousands of live in staff, doesn't even have to pay her own heating bills.
meanwhile some old lady with nothing, will be sat in her house by candle light wearing 5 layers of clothes. probably wont be found for weeks once she dies.
same old lady is paying taxes that go towards the queen, disgusting
Wow, what a nice person you are.*snip*
“Rule over the population like monsters”why would anyone celebrate a mafia type family who came to power with violence and force then rule over the population like monsters for hundreds of years..
if only the kray twins or some other family had been born a few hundred years earlier, we could celebrate them instead
you think the royal family are better than someone like pablo escobar? they are the same kind of people.
just they legitimised themselves and created a monopoly no one can break.
worried about someone with probably the best healthcare in the world, thousands of live in staff, doesn't even have to pay her own heating bills.
meanwhile some old lady with nothing, will be sat in her house by candle light wearing 5 layers of clothes. probably wont be found for weeks once she dies.
same old lady is paying taxes that go towards the queen, disgusting
"for hundreds of years"“Rule over the population like monsters”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...y-fund-to-heat-buckingham-palace-2088179.htmlYawn.
The Queen doesn’t receive money from the taxpayer. At least do some research.
but I guess your on of those who doesn't count "government" money as "money raised from the public"Aides complained to ministers in 2004 that the Queen's gas and electricity bills, which had increased by 50 per cent that year, stood at more than £1m a year and had become "untenable".
The Royal Household also complained that the £15m government grant to maintain the Queen's palaces was inadequate.
wonder whos energy prices are increased aka public money going to the queenThe Queen’s ownership of the British coastline is as old as the monarchy itself. But her right to collect royalties from wind and wave power is much more recent: it was granted by Tony Blair’s Labour government in a 2004 act of parliament.
why would anyone celebrate a mafia type family who came to power with violence and force then rule over the population like monsters for hundreds of years..
did people get shot by their officers for refusing to fight wars?The modern royal family have ruled over the population like monsters?
You're going to have to back that up with some facts and information.
And don't be judging long ago history by today's standards and then calling it monstrous when it was acceptable at the time in question.
I'm no royalist but I can't see where you're having your point from.