Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
DDR5 seems like it's not even going to make a decent difference until higher speeds still come along, 6400 CL36 is pretty expensive. So by the time faster speeds come out and prices come down it will probably be later this year minimum, if not next year and then we'll be close to another new CPU being Meteor Lake.Quite smart of Intel to retain DDR4 support if DDR5 prices remain really high.
Will make people think twice about their upgrade to alder/raptor or Zen 4.
DDR5 seems like it's not even going to make a decent difference until higher speeds still come along, 6400 CL36 is pretty expensive. So by the time faster speeds come out and prices come down it will probably be later this year minimum, if not next year and then we'll be close to another new CPU being Meteor Lake.
I also have a feeling Intel might hold the single core performance over AMD, though i guess that's hard to predict anyway. If AMD have high pricing for Zen 4 i can see Intel having better price/performance again.
You have to look it from the other perspetive, AM5 is future proof, there will be support for at least 2 next gen CPU-s, and while DDR5 is expensive, it will drive next gen cpu-s aswell. RPL will be last cpu for that platform, and also last cpu that will have hybrid controller so ddr4 users will need to buy new memory sticks too combined with buying whole new platform for upgrade which in the end would be more expensive than buying Zen 4 with ddr5 + support for next gen cpu-s.It's very likely RPL will be better value than Zen4 (assuming they both release this year) simply due to DDR4 controller on RPL and compatibility with what will be older Z690 motherboards when the Z790 boards launch.
Not necessarily. As I mentioned before, from the beginning Raptor Lake's P cores were rumoured to have a little tweak to them, giving IPC about a 5-10% increase. The tweaked core is suggested to be called Raptor Cove, and therefore imply (in true Intel fashion) that it's actually something new. Given Raptor Lake is supposed to incorporate that new energy saving tech Intel developed/acquired recently, it make sense to give the P cores a wee nudge to either help reduce power draw, or benefit from having a greater power budget available.No increase in P-Cores, don't see the point
Well no, Raptor Lake looks to double the E core count, at least on the top end. 13900K will be 24c/32tIt's not a surprise, it was always going to be just a binned and overclocked 12900k.
RPL doesn't look like anything to get excited about but on pure gaming performance, I think it will compete.
DDR5 pricing, pricing and features of both platforms in general, performance per watt and future upgradability will be deciding factors.
I just can't understand why AMD didn't do the same with Zen4?
AMD is going to be fine supporting DDR5 only. It's still ~6 months away and as it's a new platform, they can start off fresh vs dragging ddr4 along.
Z690 (support Alder Lake 12th gen & Raptor Lake 13th gen) is also a new platform, Intel still took the decision to include both DDR4 & DDR5 controller. Seems a no-brainer to me, especially considering how volatile the supply chain is.
ADL came out Nov last year. DDR5 was barely in production. Launching without DDR4 would be a disaster. Not to mention a major cost bump in adopting ADL due to DDR5 prices at the time and poor performance vs DD45.
There's a 10month+ gap between and ADL and Zen5. RPL is on the same upgrade cycle as ADL so keeping DDR4 support there is needed or you might as well have a net new platform.
By time Zen 4 comes it will be better, and AM5 will support at least 2-3 next gen cpu-s (not including Zen 4), so ddr5 will drive you for many years, while RPL is the last cpu for that plaform, and last platform that have hybrid controller so you have to pay for ddr4 and later ddr5 when buying new cpu, while with AMD you pay only for ddr5 and you are fine for many years. And also hybrid design have compromises, so i prefer clean ddr5 only controller.DDR5 is still significantly more expensive than DDR4, I don't expect this to change in the next few months, especially considering current affairs in Europe.