I remember when people said the Nvidia TITAN was too expensive at £1000. I dont remember it selling out, look were are now. GPU's over £1000 sell out instantly.
Last edited:
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
RDNA 3 rumours Q3/4 2022
- Thread starter Grim5
- Start date
- Status
This is not apples to apples comparison as the 6950Xt only gets 42FPS with FSR in the AMD graph.
Well, 4090 is about 16% faster at native resolution vs. 7900xtx with FSR. Kinda DOA for RT.
Most likely the situation will be the same down the stack, so once more if you want RT nVIDIA is the way to go.
Probably they'll "glue" some RT cores later down the generations to actually stay competitive.
But but only nvidia do dodgy marketing tactics!
That was far more smoke and mirrors than nvidias show ffs
I hate to say it but I agree. AMD should be better than this, there’s absolutely no need for it.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 454
to be fair the 3080 where £800 ish ...now worth £400 2nd hand lol
Lucky man!
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,235
Hold on, those were non RT numbers.
So,
vs
So, to make it simple. 4090 does about 42fps native, vs 7900xtx (if would be double 6950xt), 26fps +/- .
Ouch. So much for good gaming for "years to come".
Last edited:
Well, 4090 is about 16% faster at native resolution vs. 7900xtx with FSR. Kinda DOA for RT.
Most likely the situation will be the same down the stack, so once more if you want RT nVIDIA is the way to go.
Probably they'll "glue" some RT cores later down the generations to actually stay competitive.
Not sure it's that simple?
Oh posted something else before this, but yeah still behind. Though at it's price point it's probably ok.
Last edited:
I'm stuck in nvidia camp due to cuda but want AMD to do well to push nvidia prices down etc.... sadly it seems AMD have just pushed theirs up to match Nvidia... true '4K' pc gaming is going to be for millionaires only at this rate.
I'm hoping we get a price cut for the 4080 16gb (to what the 12gb would have been if not less), the ad103 chip used inside it would normally be a 4060-4070 range chip after all and they release the 'true 4080' using the cut down ad102 chip released instead.
I'm hoping we get a price cut for the 4080 16gb (to what the 12gb would have been if not less), the ad103 chip used inside it would normally be a 4060-4070 range chip after all and they release the 'true 4080' using the cut down ad102 chip released instead.
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2012
- Posts
- 4,448
- Location
- North West
It’s called inflation. Things go up.
All I get from that is that we're still a decade away from GPUs doing full Ray tracing comfortably.Hold on, those were non RT numbers.
So,
vs
So, to make it simple. 4090 does about 42fps native, vs 7900xtx (if would be double 6950xt), 26fps +/- .
Ouch. So much for good gaming for "years to come".
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,333
- Location
- Planet Earth
Gamers defended the first Kepler Titan which doubled top dGPU pricing for £450 with the GTX580 to nearly £1000 in one generation nearly a decade ago.
And ever since Nvidia managed to rebrand its top gaming dGPU as a Titan and essentially charge top level money for what would be called a 70 series card(the 80TI) its been downhill from then.
If Nvidia had charged $1000 for an RTX4090,the RX7900XTX would have probably replaced the RX6800XT at $699. But the reality is AMD could easily undercut the RTX4070 16GB(same sized die as the RTX3070) at $1200,by charging exactly the same price for the RX6900XT/RX6950XT.
If AMD figures are true,then that is a 50% to 70% generational increase at the same USD price generation on generation. Nvidia,made it easy for AMD.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 20,703
- Location
- Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
If nvidia are paying lots for their package then this will be interesting how low they can cut it. If you look at the ampere cards not dropping below msrp after 2 years and on cheaper samsung then...
The only point to go on here is the 61tflops vs 83tflops on the 4090 indicating it’s a good chunk weaker than 4090. There was literally almost nothing on concrete performance in the presentation.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,235
Can be priced the same as a 4070, if a 4060ti is ahead in RT (and cheaper), won't matter. Is the same situation with RDNA2 vs. 3xxx.
Associate
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2019
- Posts
- 1,003
Absolutely demolishes Nvidia in performance per dollar which is what matters to the vast majority of people. I'd say there is a cigar.
It is me or the 7900XTX is getting way higher fps in Valorant and Apex Legends than a 4090.
For Valorant, AMD is claiming 704fps at 4K but a 4090 is getting around 550fps at 1080P settings in this video:
The 4090 gets around 220fps at 4K in Apex legends.
What is going on here??? Is it really faster in Rasterization than a 4090 for a much lower price??
For Valorant, AMD is claiming 704fps at 4K but a 4090 is getting around 550fps at 1080P settings in this video:
The 4090 gets around 220fps at 4K in Apex legends.
What is going on here??? Is it really faster in Rasterization than a 4090 for a much lower price??
Last edited:
Except wages of course, they remain low.
- Status