Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yeah fair enough, but it has taken majority if not by the time it is done it will have taken the whole of the 2000 series product life cycle to have got to this point. As I suspected from the start, the 2000 series is beta testing Nvidia's stuff where you pay for the privilege of doing so. I thank everyone who has done this and look forward to the 3000 series
theres a guy on here touting thats why AMD gpu's are gash because of same logic with drivers..
Yeah fair enough, but it has taken majority if not by the time it is done it will have taken the whole of the 2000 series product life cycle to have got to this point. As I suspected from the start, the 2000 series is beta testing Nvidia's stuff where you pay for the privilege of doing so. I thank everyone who has done this and look forward to the 3000 series
No problem, looking forward to the 3s too
AMD has already had driver issues, but yeah why not it would make sense that Navi is just a beta test for AMD's driver team. Thanks to 5700/xt owners for beta testing those trashy drivers
It hasn't taken 8 months to add DLSS into wolfenstein, they could have done it earlier. They delayed it because they were building DLSS 2.0 and once it was finished they went ahead and released it in game.
DLSS 2.0 fixes basically all the complaints from last year. Blurry graphics? Nope looks like native OR better. Only runs at certain resolutins? Nope now runs on everything for every RTX GPU.
As pointed out, DLSS 1.0 and 1.5 required a lot of manual input from the developer and if they want to upgrade to DLSS 2.0 they need to go back into their game code and remove all traces of DLSS 1.0 and 1.5.
Once thats done Nvidia can add DLSS 2.0 via a driver update.
I don't see it happening, DLSS is 2.0 is going to be forward facing - Nvidia said DLSS 2.0 profiles will be released in game ready drivers, which kind of implies for new games on release day rather than going back and revisiting older titles. Developers in any case won't go back on their old games now to rework DLSS.
It actually makese sense that DLSS 1.0 and 1.5 was pushed upon RTX2000 owners to beta test. This was Nvidia's plan all along - they knew adding raster performance would be hard since their dies are getting ridiculously big. And they figured it would take time, but they could make an AI system that would give generational performance boosts without negatively affecting the graphics. It took longer than expected but they did it and now with DLSS 2.0 ready to roll RTX3000 is ready for prime time.
AMD has always had driver issues, but yeah why not it would make sense that Navi is just a beta test for AMD's driver team. Thanks to 5700/xt owners for beta testing those trashy drivers
Clearly, a year and a half after DLSS launched, even Nvidia would admit this hasn’t gone to plan. This is almost an identical situation to Nvidia’s RTX ray tracing. The feature has been heavily advertised as a 'must have' for PC gamers, but the first few games to support the tech didn’t impress, and it's taken nearly a year to get half-decent game implementations that as of today can be counted on one hand.
DLSS overpromised at launch over a year ago...
Just like with ray tracing, it’s nice to eventually get DLSS support in games, but doing so weeks or months after the games' launch is almost worthless. We can’t imagine too many people going back to play Youngblood months after release specifically for DLSS, even less so having received mediocre reviews.
We have no doubt that DLSS will become a fantastic inclusion in games beyond today, but we've got to say that looking back Nvidia went too far on promising what they were unable to deliver. It was common to see promotion slides like the above, showing off the magical free performance DLSS would provide.
The huge slate of DLSS games is almost laughable in 2020 with most of these never getting DLSS. Those are some major releases that Nvidia advertised would support DLSS but never came to fruition. We asked them about this and their response was that initial DLSS implementations were “more difficult than we expected, and the quality was not where we wanted it to be” so they decided to focus on improving DLSS instead of adding it to more games.
Lol. Unlikely. How the hell is it going to make it better than native?
Lol. Unlikely. How the hell is it going to make it better than native?
Would love to see that magic
So sharper means overall better?
I avoid using any form of aa at 4K whenever I can. Though some games need it still. I guess for those using DLSS would be beneficial.
So sharper means overall better?
I have been going on about 4K being much sharper and better since 2014 and many here were like nah. They come out with stuff like I had a 4K and 1440p side by side and could not tell the difference. Only the past year or so have people changed their tune slowly
I avoid using any form of aa at 4K whenever I can. Though some games need it still. I guess for those using DLSS would be beneficial.
