• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

really getting fed up with the posts stating RTX/DLSS does not work this gen

imginy said:
Looks fake.

Why does the one on the left have smudges and artifacts round the girls hair if it's native 4k.

Looks like someone like someone got a 4k video then uploaded it in 720p or something.

I have never seen native 4k look anything like that.

EDIT: ( Might be the fact youtube has lowered my qaulity default down.)

But still the 4k native looks like trash even on 4k youtube vid.
Click to expand...

Most games these days use AA that blurs edges, it's a lot cheaper to run than MSAA. DLSS 2.0 gives you MSAA sharpness with a 50% performance boost.
 
Grim5 said:
Most games these days use AA that blurs edges, it's a lot cheaper to run than MSAA. DLSS 2.0 gives you MSAA sharpness with a 50% performance boost.
Click to expand...

I will believe it when I see it.

Hopefully it does but I didn't see it in the video you posted. The 4k game in the video (control) had edges of a 1080p game so making it look better wasn't impressive at all.

The chances are I will buy next gen nvidia card the day it releases so it would be a nice feature to have.
 
Grim5 said:
Most games these days use AA that blurs edges, it's a lot cheaper to run than MSAA. DLSS 2.0 gives you MSAA sharpness with a 50% performance boost.
Click to expand...

But isn't that a bit misleading? using an AA method that makes the picture looks worse and the comparison that much better? I would rather see Native 4k no AA versus DLSS 2.0.
 
Phixsator said:
But isn't that a bit misleading? using an AA method that makes the picture looks worse and the comparison that much better? I would rather see Native 4k no AA versus DLSS 2.0.
Click to expand...

most of these game don't let you turn off AA, or if you they do, they look much much worse. Some recent examples is modern warfare and outer worlds - both look like vomit comet with AA off and blurry with AA on
 
What I noticed in Control is it looks almost like someone messed with reshade and boosted contrast + added more sharpening, for DLSS 2.0. When you do that the image is often more pleasing and seems clearer but it's doable without DLSS as well, obviously. There's definitely some dodgy things going on, but you'd still want to use DLSS in Control simply because you'll need the performance for ray tracing, and without ray tracing the game is insanely noisy even at 4K and imo graphically overrated in that case.

Plus DLSS also seems to deal poorly with post-processing. If you ever see the flying chair dudes in the open space near the exec office you'll know what I'm talking about. The little blur/time-warp from QB effect around them is MUCH hazier than when without DLSS - very noticeably so. Probably some other issues as well but eh, the performance gain is legit.

The "better than native IQ" claim is still total BS tho and really unnecessary.
 
WCCF spurt out whatever the manufacturer marketing department says, and reports it like fact. Other media outlets follow suit. What perfection for manufacturers. Zero analysis... sigh.

How about.... Nvidia stop sand bagging and actually give us the 4K performing cards at a decent price, since they brag out how efficient they are all the time, and their designs (chips aside) on the PCB are significantly cheaper to make. (The unsaid here is .. AMD need to pull their finger out as well then we won't need things like DLSS)
 
Whats that thing called AMD cards do, that reduces the quality of the graphics as you're playing ?

Someone done a video on it, using Borderlands 3.

Ive not seen anyone slating that to buggery yet. :p

EDIT: Radeon Boost, thats it.
 
Last edited:
Radeon Boost is awful, I don't think I've seen anyone praise or recommend it. Then again, it's free & not silicon you pay for, so it's hard to whinge about it.
 
LoadsaMoney said:
Whats that thing called AMD cards do, that reduces the quality of the graphics as you're playing ?

Someone done a video on it, using Borderlands 3.

Ive not seen anyone slating that to buggery yet. :p

EDIT: Radeon Boost, thats it.
Click to expand...

That was added in December on games that supporting. It wasn't the selling point of a product like DLSS was :P
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom