Relationship disaster - help

Sylv said:
The term 'love' is thrown around a lot these days without much meaning, is easily confused with physical attraction
Click to expand...

I couldn't ever sleep with someone unless I loved them, physical attraction is stage one, love is stage 2, sex is stage 3 lol, took me 3 weeks to go through all that with my current girlfriend
 
Jay794 said:
I couldn't ever sleep with someone unless I loved them, physical attraction is stage one, love is stage 2, sex is stage 3 lol, took me 3 weeks to go through all that with my current girlfriend
Click to expand...

Then you are a rare breed my friend!
I personally don't think love can be measured on a timeline, when it happens, it happens. But in this case i think the OP should have taken control and stopped it getting as far as it has.
I just hope he doesn't have any pets!
 
Sylv said:
Then you are a rare breed my friend!
I personally don't think love can be measured on a timeline, when it happens, it happens. But in this case i think the OP should have taken control and stopped it getting as far as it has.
I just hope she doesn't have any pets!
Click to expand...

Thanks, I correct your post too, if she has a pet dog, I bet it lives in her handbag and is called fluffy-woofy or something equally as stupid,

If fluffy-woofy doesn't like the man then we don't like the man either :rolleyes:

What is it with the OCUK forum recently, loads of threads popping with "this bitch be crazy" lol
 
There is no relationship OP Its been 2 weeks FFS!

And she is clearly mental, you can either use this to your advantage (and claim a free ticket to hell) or do the right thing and nip this in the bud now to save a lot of hassle (and there will be tears later down the line) I imagine you neglected to have this 'talk' last night too. Midnight mass tonight is it?
 
50556_231766136316_7602761_n.jpg
 
Angilion said:
You're joking, right?

The statement that you claim to be replying to(*) was that this woman probably won't have had many (if any) boyfriends because she's a particularly devout Christian.

A woman who is a devout follower of a religion that disapproves of any intimate relationships outside of marriage has probably had fewer boyfriends than most women who aren't. The religion she places such high priority on says that she shouldn't have any.

To call understanding that "narrow-minded" is nonsense. You're either a troll or very silly.



* I phrased it that way because I don't see any connection between the statement and your "reply" to it.
Click to expand...

Neither a troll nor very silly. All relationships don't involve sex before marriage. Your comments don't make any sense when you read what was originally written. OP was just another typical OCUK GD sweeping generalisation.

Jay794 said:
****ing Christians, always pushing beliefs on everyone else, just like every other ****ing religion
Click to expand...

They might say the same about bigots like you. Intolerant much?
 
ringo747 said:
They might say the same about bigots like you. Intolerant much?
Click to expand...

I'm being a bigot or intolerant, Christians can believe in a zombie all they want, as long as they don't force me to.

I was merely saying that based on what the OP has said, that bitch be CRAZY YO!

No sex before marriage is dumb, I fully support the "try-before-you-buy" theory, I mean how are you supposed to know what something is like until you try it (rape excluded lol)
 
Most of you are being a bit hard on her, if she's not been in many (any) relationships then she's going to be really naive, that doesn't make her a bunny boiler.
She actually sounds a better bet than a lot of the skanky trollops out there, but she's clearly wasted on the OP.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom