Renowned journalist resigns in protest of attacks on press freedom

MagicBoy said:
Cuomo didn't replace/appoint the people running the Government agencies involved in pandemic response and planning such as CDC, FEMA, FDA etc.
Click to expand...


So you didn't know that a governor of a state has more power then the president in that state.

The person who is in charge of that state has his own agencies for the virus....but you knew that didn't you? what you never !
You should have read the link ;)
 
Roar87 said:
So if I didn't know that video existed, and I searched for videos of Joe Biden being creepy, is it normal that a video with 880 views should come up before a video with 1.2m? I'm saying exactly that is the issue, the video is being hidden, and @Greebo is saying I don't know how to search for it? Are you not that bright? I'm talking about someone who didn't know the video existed being prevented from seeing it due to it being deliberately hidden, and you're saying I'm just not searching for it correctly? lmao
Click to expand...

the one that comes up with 880 views has probably had a comment on it more recently. The point is all 112 videos on "Creepy Joe" are listed when you use that search. Isnt that enough? How are people been prevented from seeing it? Its there in the search. There are loads, most will no doubt use the same footage.

There are 11 videos with many more views than your creepy joe video including one with 4.2m views. Why should your video with only 1.2 views come above them? I think Youtube uses how many people are currently watching them or watching them that day/week as one of its criteria for where it comes in the search results. Perhaps more people are watching the one with 880 views than the one with 1.2m. Perhaps that one is trending fast and could be 100,000 by next week.

Do you really want Youtube to bring up everything by the total number of views every time you search so anything new might be on page 100 of the results? Or more recent ones or ones that are currently been watched first? And Youtube search results is always based on how long somebody has watched a video for. If people are only watching 10 seconds of a 20 minute video, it goes further down the search results as the algorithm figures that even though lots of people have "viewed" it, it cant be very good as the amount of time watching it is very small.

Like I said, if you just want to see the list of most viewed videos from your search, its just one click.
 
Last edited:
Werewolf said:
If you've paid any attention to the story you'll know that IIRC

The laptop was allegedly dropped off at a random computer store a couple of thousand miles from where he lived.
The Laptop is a macbook where the default is that it pushes you to encrypt it - and it wasn't.
There was a hard drive dropped off with it that has a warranty that suggests it was made AFTER it was dropped off if you go by the timeline that is being spouted.
The computer is in the hands of the FBI, no it's not in the hands of the FBI
The computer had child porn on it - yet the people who handled it made copies of it depending on which version of Rudy's story time you listen to (you would have to be thick as anything to do that given that means you're now up for a charge of possessing, distributing and making child porn) and the FBI haven't acted on the latop (they wouldn't leave it as child porn normally gets a fast response as it's an easy prosecution and opens the door for a really deep look into anything else).

Then you get to the Tucker Carson stuff where you've:
Got a package of vital paper documents that have been sent via courier (without making any copies*) and has been intercepted and the contents removed.
The package has been found with the USB drive in it (wait weren't they paper documents? and had already been delivered opened?)
The whole thing should be dropped as it's not important.

Then you've got the attempt to make the fact that Hunter Biden had another laptop seized when a therapist of his was arrested a big thing, despite the fact that the FBI handed it back once they knew it didn't belong to the the person they were after.

The story has more holes than a colander, to the point where the first paper offered it said "not a chance" after doing some very basic checks and IIRC the second one couldn't get any of it's normal staff to agree to put their names on it.

*Yes really, it's routine for experienced "journalists" to send the only copies of vitally important documents via mail as opposed to you know making copies of it.
Click to expand...

Soooooo long answer short - No, you don't know whats really on it because you've not seen it, you've just read news reports like everyone else and based on those news reports you, without any knowledge of what is on the HD, have decided to tell everyone that it's all bull-crap. As I mentioned, until it's fully investigated and any evidence is collected and presented in a court, then no-one can say whether the story or it's contents are true or not, although people are obviously free to give an "opinion" on what they believe, however that still remains just an opinion and is not in any way factual.
 
ianh said:
Soooooo long answer short - No, you don't know whats really on it because you've not seen it, you've just read news reports like everyone else and based on those news reports you, without any knowledge of what is on the HD, have decided to tell everyone that it's all bull-crap. As I mentioned, until it's fully investigated and any evidence is collected and presented in a court, then no-one can say whether the story or it's contents are true or not, although people are obviously free to give an "opinion" on what they believe, however that still remains just an opinion and is not in any way factual.
Click to expand...

Theres no evidence there ever was a laptop. Just tall stories from liars.
 
Greebo said:
the one that comes up with 880 views has probably had a comment on it more recently. The point is all 112 videos on "Creepy Joe" are listed when you use that search. Isnt that enough? How are people been prevented from seeing it? Its there in the search. There are loads, most will no doubt use the same footage.

There are 11 videos with many more views than your creepy joe video including one with 4.2m views. Why should your video with only 1.2 views come above them? I think Youtube uses how many people are currently watching them or watching them that day/week as one of its criteria for where it comes in the search results. Perhaps more people are watching the one with 880 views than the one with 1.2m. Perhaps that one is trending fast and could be 100,000 by next week.

Do you really want Youtube to bring up everything by the total number of views every time you search so anything new might be on page 100 of the results? Or more recent ones or ones that are currently been watched first? And Youtube search results is always based on how long somebody has watched a video for. If people are only watching 10 seconds of a 20 minute video, it goes further down the search results as the algorithm figures that even though lots of people have "viewed" it, it cant be very good as the amount of time watching it is very small.

Like I said, if you just want to see the list of most viewed videos from your search, its just one click.
Click to expand...

Ok man sure, tech companies aren't hiding Conservative content and that video is just hidden because of algorithms
 
wesimmo said:
Theres no evidence there ever was a laptop. Just tall stories from liars.
Click to expand...

There was never any evidence of Russia collusion but it didn't stop the corporate media giving 24/7 coverage of it and speculating for 3 years? Adam Schiff, the guy who started the claim that the information allegedly from Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation (which has already been rubbished by the FBI and others) is the same person who was in numerous televised interviews a few years ago saying that he has personally seen evidence of Trump/Russia collusion, if that's the case why didn't he share any of it with Mueller's team and why should we believe what he says this time?

Why the double standard from the corporate media and social media? is it just coincidence that they are mostly all Democrat party donors? if it's all bunk then why don't they just do their jobs, investigate it and disprove it? why ignore and actively suppress it? could they possibly want someone in the Whitehouse who can be blackmailed/bought?
 
Last edited:
mmj_uk said:
There was never any evidence of Russia collusion but it didn't stop the corporate media giving 24/7 coverage of it and speculating for 3 years? Adam Schiff, the guy who started the claim that it is Russian disinformation is the same person who was in numerous televised interviews saying that he has seen evidence of Trump/Russia collusion, if that's the case why didn't he share any of it with Mueller's team and why should we believe him this time?
Click to expand...

Bloody hell you came back :eek:

Fair play dude, hope you keep it up.
 
Remember Trump was impeached by the Democrats because they claimed he was threatening Ukraine with withholding money if Ukraine didn't investigate the firing of a prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden and Buresma, the Democrats claimed it was an abuse of power even though there was never actually any threat made by Trump (he released the phone call). The corporate media covered these claims of a "quid pro quo" involving Trump extensively.

Here Biden is admitting to threatening Ukraine with having money withheld if they didn't fire the prosecutor investigating his son and Buresma:

Why is the corporate media not even investigating it? is the video Russian disinformation? pretty good CGI if so.
 
Last edited:
Why do you keep posting the same old debunked stuff, endlessly. :)

Surely your CT cult should have new made up material by now. Some kind of paid troll, just to endlessly post the same old stuff on the internet so it gets indexed somewhere.
 
chroniclard said:
Why do you keep posting the same old debunked stuff, endlessly. :)

Surely your CT cult should have new made up material by now. Some kind of paid troll, just to endlessly post the same old stuff on the internet so it gets indexed somewhere.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure he gives his login details to people to spread his drivel tbh. The contrast between some of his more intelligent posts and this stuff is beyond logical explanation.
 
mmj_uk said:
Here Biden is admitting to threatening Ukraine with having money withheld if they didn't fire the prosecutor investigating his son and Buresma:

Why is the corporate media not even investigating it? is the video Russian disinformation? pretty good CGI if so.
Click to expand...

Why do the Mods let you repeat the same lie in 20 different threads?
 
mmj_uk said:
Remember Trump was impeached by the Democrats because they claimed he was threatening Ukraine with withholding money if Ukraine didn't investigate the firing of a prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden and Buresma, the Democrats claimed it was an abuse of power even though there was never actually any threat made by Trump (he released the phone call). The corporate media covered these claims of a "quid pro quo" involving Trump extensively.

Here Biden is admitting to threatening Ukraine with having money withheld if they didn't fire the prosecutor investigating his son and Buresma:

Why is the corporate media not even investigating it? is the video Russian disinformation? pretty good CGI if so.
Click to expand...
Anything to say about how stupid it is to cite a Guardian article about a topic you then claim is being suppressed by the "mainstream media"?

Or do we all just have to ride along on this gishgallop of bull**** of yours?
 
I am puzzled by the presence on a UK PC hardware site of a number of people who appear to be dedicated, enthusiastic followers of the American President's journey down Desolation Row :confused:
 
Roar87 said:
Ok man sure, tech companies aren't hiding Conservative content and that video is just hidden because of algorithms
Click to expand...

I really dont see your issue. The search comes back with 112 Creepy Joe videos. Some have over 4.2m views and just one video you are picking on doesnt appear on the first page.

Why isnt this compilation video with 3.6m views ahead of the one you listed on Google but is on Youtube?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy07yHAgM4E

I honestly cant see how you can claim they are hiding Conservative content. They are all there.
 
mmj if you want to post nonsense that's been debunked hundreds of times in the Trump thread alone, please do it somewhere else, it's getting really boring having to deal with the same few users bringing up the same nonsense in the wrong forums time after time.


And yes the Soros/Clinton/Big tech/Secret Global council of the lizard people have got to me, I am really Soros and Hillary's lizardman love child in disguise.
 
There are widespread reports of voter fraud including machines flipping votes due to a software bug and the corporate media are refusing to even acknowledge it, just as they did with Hunter Biden's laptop and the dodgy dealings it exposed. Social media are actively censoring these reports.

If Joe Biden really wants national unity isn't it in his interest for the corporate media to do a bit of journalism and set minds at ease? How can the corporate media spend 3 years pushing a Russia collusion conspiracy claiming that they interfered in the 2016 election but then after pushing insecure mail-in voting now claim without question that voter fraud is impossible and it's the cleanest election ever?
 
mmj_uk said:
There are widespread reports of voter fraud including machines flipping votes due to a software bug and the corporate media are refusing to even acknowledge it, just as they did with Hunter Biden's laptop and the dodgy dealings it exposed. Social media are actively censoring these reports.

If Joe Biden really wants national unity isn't it in his interest for the corporate media to do a bit of journalism and set minds at ease? How can the corporate media spend 3 years pushing a Russia collusion conspiracy claiming that they interfered in the 2016 election but then after pushing insecure mail-in voting now claim without question that voter fraud is impossible and it's the cleanest election ever?
Click to expand...

How are they widespread if the corporate media aren't reporting on them?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom