Renowned journalist resigns in protest of attacks on press freedom
- Thread starter mmj_uk
- Start date
Soldato
Permabanned
It's all on the link posted above if you follow it through.
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 12,130
I guess that it must be April 1st somewhere in some parallel Universe?
Soldato
I did.
Never found anything you said.
I did see that it has happened through that state.
Looks like FL all over again
Permabanned
Ok well of you are going to ignore all the official explanations there isn't much we can do.
Soldato
Ok well of you are going to ignore all the official explanations there isn't much we can do.
Well that's what I asked for.
Link please as I can't find one.
Found one.
So they admit there was a software glitch.
And gave trump his votes back and he won Antrim County.
Lets see if they bother with the rest of them.
Suspended
I feel a LOL coming on.
Soldato
I thought this thread was going to be Owen Jones getting cancelled by the Guardian, I have never heard of this "renowned" journalist Glenn Greenwald.
Soldato
But you HAVE heard about the quite literal "world changing" story he's written (alongside 2 others) where they announced the Edward Snowden Leaks to the world which, for me at least, is how a journalist should be - The story makes the news not the journalist, something very rare in today's media where far too many journalists want to be the "star" and don't care about the story.
Soldato
Are @mmj_uk and Co banned from Speaker's Corner?
Just wondering why these threads spill into GD and other parts of the forum
Just wondering why these threads spill into GD and other parts of the forum
There are numerous videos like this currently doing the rounds:
If you look at the Pennsylvania vote count at the bottom exactly 19,958 votes get flipped from Trump to Biden.
Trump goes from 1,690,589 to 1,670,631.
Biden goes from 1,252,537 to 1,272,495.
What are the odds? I wonder if they are using the same software mentioned in my previous video where 6000 votes were flipped due to a 'bug'.
I supposed you could argue that the video is either fake or corrections were being made but it's worth investigating no? where are the mainstream journalists covering it like they did Russia's alleged involvement in 2016? most of them refuse to even acknowledge that the election was possibly interfered with despite 3-4 years of 24/7 coverage saying just that about 2016. Real journalism is dead in the corporate media.
The corporate media seem happy to cover stories where their is zero evidence just as long as it stuck the knife in Trump but when you have something substantial (Hunter Biden's laptop/emails) or reports of rigging this election they turn a blind eye.
If you look at the Pennsylvania vote count at the bottom exactly 19,958 votes get flipped from Trump to Biden.
Trump goes from 1,690,589 to 1,670,631.
Biden goes from 1,252,537 to 1,272,495.
What are the odds? I wonder if they are using the same software mentioned in my previous video where 6000 votes were flipped due to a 'bug'.
I supposed you could argue that the video is either fake or corrections were being made but it's worth investigating no? where are the mainstream journalists covering it like they did Russia's alleged involvement in 2016? most of them refuse to even acknowledge that the election was possibly interfered with despite 3-4 years of 24/7 coverage saying just that about 2016. Real journalism is dead in the corporate media.
The corporate media seem happy to cover stories where their is zero evidence just as long as it stuck the knife in Trump but when you have something substantial (Hunter Biden's laptop/emails) or reports of rigging this election they turn a blind eye.
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 12,130
What "world changing" story alongside 2 others are you referring to here?
Are you just referring to the "Snowden leaks"? I was under the impression that these were published simultaneously in The Guardian, Der Spiegel, and The Washington Post amongst other newspapers.
According to Wikipedia "Greenwald found the measures that the source asked him to take to secure their communications, such as encrypting email, too annoying to employ." - it's a hard life being a Star investigative Journalist
But its just one tv station with some guy inputting figures for display on the screen. I suspect the guy had put those votes in the wrong way round earlier and was just correcting it.
You only had to follow this thread and because people were posting from different sources, the number of votes was all over the place.
No if you show me some official site giving out the votes who then changed it, then yes I would ask the question but this is just a tc station and guy has probably been inputting figures fro hours on end.
Permabanned
With something this scale there might be a minimal amount of human error, fraud, whatever, but given Trump got smashed then its not going to make a difference.
560 swing from Republican to Democrat here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/sgzYzeUGC1zI/
Another fake perhaps? nobody knows because the corporate media aren't even willing to entertain anything untoward happening this election.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/sgzYzeUGC1zI/
Another fake perhaps? nobody knows because the corporate media aren't even willing to entertain anything untoward happening this election.
Associate
Just to confirm, you don't think evidence of fraud would be a concern as long as it doesn't ultimately affect the outcome?
Permabanned
No, that would be putting words in my mouth.
So far there has been no evidence of fraud presented, outside of baseless CT theories and salty tears.
Soldato
What "world changing" story alongside 2 others are you referring to here?
Are you just referring to the "Snowden leaks"? I was under the impression that these were published simultaneously in The Guardian, Der Spiegel, and The Washington Post amongst other newspapers.
According to Wikipedia "Greenwald found the measures that the source asked him to take to secure their communications, such as encrypting email, too annoying to employ." - it's a hard life being a Star investigative Journalist
"World changing" = The Snowden Leaks, with the original story and information being gotten by Greenwald, who worked for the Guardian (the First paper to print the initial story, there was no "simultaneous" release until later stories) alongside............
"2 others" = the other 2 journalists who helped write the initial story for their newspapers.
Also "Are you JUST referring to..........." - Maybe I'm mis-reading your implication from you use of the word "just" but it feels like you're using it to minimise the story, but this was one of the biggest stories of modern times and Greenwald was at the heart of it but kept himself out of the limelight, as all good journalists should.