I think that's it, different people measuring things in different ways. I think I'm of the same opinion as FT - the mileage is probably the wrong way of recording things, but that's not just indoor/trainer miles! Intensity and duration are much more important from a training principle!Essentially both riding outside and riding on the turbo is subject to a lot of factors that mean it's virtually impossible to directly compare one ride's miles and speeds to another. Hence why I personally don't have an issue with turbo miles being recorded in principle.
Personally, I don't even consider my own trainer miles to be the same as my 'outdoor' miles. I do use mileage as a 'goal' but it's nothing more than a weekly incentive for me to get additional mileage in around my commuting. Any direct comparing I do with Zwift is really just tongue in cheek! On that note, anyone with Zwift go beat my Box time! (7th on OcUK leaderboard)
Yup, you're cheating nothing more than yourself on things like Zwift.I will never ever understand the logic behind the thinking of someone who is willing to cheat at any level, never mind at an amateur level. Lying to yourself and having the negative judgement of others rightfully put on you when you get found out for the sake a tiny amount of false glory just baffles me.
Cheating on something like Zwift or Strava and lying to yourself and everyone else surely has to be result of actual mental issues up there.
Just let them think they're CAT A/B and then get their arses handed to them in the real world by CAT3-4 riders
Last edited: