Russell Brand.

her comment - makes you think of this scene - Brand was never going to be A-list ... or a Banderas, who he had looked like he was trying to model himself on

 
The nutjobs are out in full force :D

In other news, sanity still exists somewhere out there:

ZPnY1rr.png
 
Last edited:
Colonel_Klinck said:
Apparently its a British military psyop, because that makes a lot of sense :rolleyes:

Click to expand...

My god
Have a look at some of the other stuff he posts

Hes 100% either a fake account (Russian really) or hes a proper CT nutjob

"My hotel in Donetsk"
"The West’s favorite Nazis, the Azov Brigade"
"The Polish president’s criticism didn’t come from nowhereIt’s rooted in a century-old mistrust, nurtured by the nationalist legacy that Ukraine’s modern Nazis are so keen to celebrate"
"Leaked documents obtained by @TheGrayzoneNews expose the shadowy British intelligence contractor which helped sell the story that Assad was responsible for a deadly chemical weapons attack in Ghouta"
"The Donbass has $12.4 trillion in mineral wealth underneath it.For the oligarchs in Kiev, the problem was it had way too many pesky Russians on top of it."

The biggest :eek: beforeI stopped
"Honored to be included on the Ukrainian regime’s list of people who committed the crime of witnessing democracy in action."
In response to this post "The list of “international observers” who came to occupied #Ukraine to enable the occupation & genocide.These aren’t “useful idiots”. These are vultures feeding on Ukraine’s suffering."
 
BowdonUK said:
The 77th brigade are real. If you don't think that a husband and wife don't share information when both hold senior positions is strange.

I'm not saying this happened in this case. But to laugh it off as though it's not possible seems equally strange.
Click to expand...

Yeah, military intelligence is a thing. 14 int, intelligence corps, SRR all real things and real solutions for the bad guys.
 
If people want to know the mind set of government control, including calling people conspiracy theorists, read some books by the Nazis. In particular what they say about the big lie. No wonder governments these days try to ban the books.

Big lie - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org

The German expression was first used by Adolf Hitler in his book Mein Kampf (1925) to describe how people could be induced to believe so colossal a lie because they would not believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously".
Click to expand...
 
SexyGreyFox said:
That was interesting on BBC News just.
A woman claiming Brand exposed himself in a BBC building in America and then 5 minutes later there is a recording of Brand and his Producer laughing about it on air and Brand admitting it.
Click to expand...

Again though, assuming Brand denies it, that’s circumstantial at best. He could claim it was just a joke and part of his stage act and persona. His word against someone else’s ultimately.

One that an anonymous individual has decided use to create a false accusation against him 15 years later.

Where is the actual evidence?

Not that I’m defending Russell! I suspect most people at this point, given his reputation and history, believe he’s guilty.

The issue most of us have is the way these unproven anonymous accusations are being manipulated by the media and used by the government.
 
Last edited:
silvagti said:
Again though, assuming Brand denies it, that’s circumstantial at best. He could claim it was just a joke and part of his stage act and persona. His word against someone else’s ultimately.

One that an anonymous individual has decided use to create a false accusation against him 15 years later.

Where is the actual evidence?
Click to expand...

Because it says there is a recording of him sating he did it? :confused:
 
Last edited:
BowdonUK said:
If people want to know the mind set of government control, including calling people conspiracy theorists, read some books by the Nazis. In particular what they say about the big lie. No wonder governments these days try to ban the books.

Big lie - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...

GCHQ and the great Tory promise concerns me. That said, we do face some rather nefarious state agencies and terrorist groups that we must defend ourselves from. But still it’s not something I’m completely comfortably with TBH. However, the British government isn’t targeting the Russell Brand’s of the world.
 
Last edited:
dlockers said:
Are you accusing me of something I haven't been found guilty at court for?
Click to expand...
Has he rang your boss, and told him to sack you on the back of this accusation? I don't get how some of you don't get this isn't about what Brand has or hasn't done, it can't be no one could possibly know at this point. It's about what you all are doing with this weird faux outrage that seems to have spread across society for these things which are not based on the reality of the situation.
 
Last edited:
Richie said:
Because it says there is a recording of him sating he did it? :confused:
Click to expand...
Is there though? If you listen the clip, he doesn't say anything equivocal like that. Basically his co-presenter brings it up and he sort of laughs about it with some spiel that doesn't actually at any point have him saying he did. The dodgiest thing he says is just before that in relation to a different woman they were discussing "I won't be able to drag her off into a cubicle, and show her my pubicles". To me, by saying 'drag her off' he's intimating non-consensual activity which is out of order. However, the woman this story concerns implies she wasn't dragged off anywhere but rather that Brand came up behind her when she was in the bathroom.

To be clear, based on what I've read and heard he sounds like a wrong'un, I'm in no way suggesting that what the lady described didn't happen, but the point at hand here is whether there is sufficient evidence beyond his word against hers.

My guess is, now all this is out in the open there will be more evidence gathered as part of the various reviews, people coming forward etc, it will keep building until it becomes an unsurmountable mountain of evidence and/or or something very unequivocal is unearthed.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom