• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen "2" ?

gavinh87 said:
8700k can do it just fine :)
The card is under utilised by around 20% at all times.
That 1080ti just became a 1080 due to a CPU :/

Worst thing is that bf1 is actually properly threaded.
Await the optimisation excuses that we heard with 1st gen ryzen......
Click to expand...

Until the ringbus craps out.
 
gavinh87 said:
8700k can do it just fine :)
The card is under utilised by around 20% at all times.
That 1080ti just became a 1080 due to a CPU :/

Worst thing is that bf1 is actually properly threaded.
Await the optimisation excuses that we heard with 1st gen ryzen......
Click to expand...

That's nowt, 8700K here bottlenecking the 1080TI to a GTX 1060. GPU doesn't get much past 60%.

 
gavinh87 said:
8700k can do it just fine :)
The card is under utilised by around 20% at all times.
That 1080ti just became a 1080 due to a CPU :/

Worst thing is that bf1 is actually properly threaded.
Await the optimisation excuses that we heard with 1st gen ryzen......
Click to expand...
If you can afford a 1080 Ti for gaming at 1080p you can afford an i7-8700K.
 
gavinh87 said:
Same map as LOLN1

Something wrong with that above video humbug, cherry picked no doubt.
Click to expand...

Oh right of course, it doesn't suit your idiotic argument so something is wrong with it.

No, Gavin, the only thing that's wrong is your constant anti AMD trolling.

That video is not the same, Gavin, clearly its completely different part of the game/map, that's obvious to anyone who looks at it for 2 seconds, and its overclocked vs stock and despite this in parts the GPU is still bottlenecked.
 
Last edited:
gavinh87 said:
Partly my point. Ryzen is only decent at 60hz gaming. 1080p/144hz+ it stuggles with.
Click to expand...
So? Why does this need to be stated for the 100th time? You will have lower fps in most games at 1080p if you're going for above 60 Hz, like <5% of people do. The i7-8700K is a top 5% product.
 
gavinh87 said:
No, you just cherry picked it.
Find another where the 8700k can't push a ti past 60% lol
Click to expand...

Nope, i just googled it and there is was.

The 2700X is running the 1080TI at 70 to 80%
The 8700K is running the 1080TI at 50 to 60%

The internet is ram packed with material that can make agenda driven arguments go round and round for years without end, its there because there is always truth to any argument you want to use this material for.

The Video LOLN1 posted is meaningless, it says absolutely nothing whatever about Ryzen performance because there is no true apples for apples comparison, its as meaningless as the clearly worse 8700K video i posted, i posted it in the same vain you did to counter act it, don't go crying because i one upped you at your own game, its so easy to do.

So give the anti AMD rhetoric a rest. Look at your own post history.
 
DragonQ said:
So? Why does this need to be stated for the 100th time? You will have lower fps in most games at 1080p if you're going for above 60 Hz, like <5% of people do. The i7-8700K is a top 5% product.
Click to expand...

Given the amount of 144hz+ monitors on the market I'd imagine its higher than 5% but sure. Doesn't affect everyone.

@humbug your replies to me contain so much irony I'm not even sure if you are trolling me at this point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom