Poll: Sack Race 2015/16

Who's getting it first?


  • Total voters
    224
So why can't we buy a goal using 541 and still concede?

Tika taka football club we are not. Pace, power, width, classy strikers is what we have been about in terms of our success.

Just look back, Sharpe, Giggs, kanchelskis, jordi cruyf, ronaldo. Only exception being becks, but his crossing, free kicks etc and just enough pace made up for it. There was even a point when head down, kick the ball hard into center of box valencia was being lauded by utd fans on here.

Of course willing runners from midfield help. When our midfield could guarantee 20 goals a season combined with 40 split across 2 strikers you knew we had goals from everywhere and firepower to overwhelm the smaller clubs.

Do we have anuy of those things right now?

Because we haven't got Messi. No other team plays in the style you are suggesting we are trying to play apart from Barca. Even Barca struggle to break down defences that have the entire team behind the ball but they made it work because they had a few world class players to unlock those defences. They had also all been playing a similar style to that for years.

LvG has shown that if you don't play as he wants you will get dropped or moved about the pitch until you fall in line. Di Maria was great but he was a headless chicken in a field of regimented soldier who were being told to hold onto the ball, not leave gaps, move up the pitch slowly and steadily. Herrera gives the ball away too much for LvG so he doesn't trust him and doesn't play him as much as he should and he has already shut down a lot of his forward passing.

You can say a clubs history or DNA is to play in a particular way but thats BS for the most part. Yes we have played with a bit of pace and width in the past but most of our players have played in a number of systems and can adapt to most things. LvG is asking them to play a certain way, they are doing that but its not effective.

People blame Chelseas players for their poor form because they can play well and they just didn't put in the effort. United players aren't getting the same stick because you can see exactly what LvG is making them do and its just ineffectual and dull. Teams have figured out how to beat us and its not hard. Sit deep and counter attack. Literally as simple as that.
 
Firstly, I do not think Louis Van Gaal is the 'right man' for Manchester United.

Secondly, a much more general point, is that no manager actually has this '<insert number of games here> to save your job'. If a manager is not working, then the club looks for a replacement/upgrade/guardian one or two wins will not solve the problems of a club.

As per second point, you may well be right, but it could also be fairly stated that right now is one of the worst times to fire anyone ( ideal time of course is as near to the summer as possible given clubs target position)

Even Hiddink doesnt have enough time to really assess the squad before Jan ( even if he is given any funds, maybe bringing in diff players makes it more complicated for the board - do they really expect Hiddink to get top 4 from where they are)?

In one sense Chelsea situation is clearer than at Utd ( something HAD to change and fastin London to get results to become more positive, even if its a short term fix), Utd are nearer where they need to be and even with two or three cheapish signings (lets say one striker, a fast winger and a CB/ full back) results could change significantly enough to get back into and stay in CL spots, even if our last few results have been nothing short of ****** awful

Im really not convinced about Mourinho, short term he might be a good bet, but in the long run I think he would damage the club more than it has been in the last 4+ years (and yes I know that includes at least the last year of SAF's reign)
 
What do people mean by damaging the club he manages. What damage has been done to Chelsea/RM. Most of Chelsea's issues are due to players underperforming, not mourinho damaging the team. I watched them in the CL and they played well.

I think mourinho would have turned it around this season and the fans still loved him. Yes he is a grade A pillock but that doesn't damage the clubs he is at compared to the good he does in the way of trophies.
 
I've said it 1000 times, Mourinho is a short term manager. He'll make decisions for today and won't give a **** about tomorrow because he won't be around. Chelsea weren't a complete mess when he left first time around but they were heading that way but tbf to Mourinho I'm not sure he was 100% to blame there. At Inter he left behind a side, that he admits himself in that ITV documentary on him, that was passed it and a club that was broke and all these years later they still haven't recovered. And he tore Real in half - I can't remember such a high profile club being as divided as Real were over Mourinho. He'd lost half the squad, he lost half the fans and he even lost half the board.
 
Last edited:
Louis van Gaal "doesn't understand English football" and is "not a head coach for Manchester United", says their former winger Andrei Kanchelskis.

"Under Alex Ferguson, we played in a more attacking style of football and played in a 4-4-2. Van Gaal sees things differently. This is not a head coach for Manchester United.

Just sayin...
 
So here it is, TRM's Xmas verdict.





Let's review the transfer ins so far:

Di Maria - flop
Schneiderlin - no idea what this guy does for a day job, gets schooled by a 33 year old Schweini - flop
Rojojo- flop, rash, will be gone soon
Depay- flop, 30 million? I reckon he's not far ahead of bebe5000 but costs 4 times as much
Blind - flop, midfielder? Defender? No one knows, he's like o'shea but occasionally pulls off a 70 yard pass

Damian - looks useful. Dropped not sure why, one mistake doesn't seem to cost anyone else their position.
Martial - 5* skills. Looks the real deal
Schweini - good, showing age, expensive luxury. Limited impact due to ineptness around him. Clearly still a good player.

Disagree about Blind. I think he is the one player who has shown he can play at this level. Its not his fault he is shunted from one position to another. For me he is more credible doing this than Jones who Fergie tried in all the same positions from time to time.

Can't argue about the rest of your summary though. Not convinced about Schweinstieger at this stage in his career.

Rooney is just **** these days. Nothing to do with tactics, he has lost his pace, his drive, his passing ability, his first touch and control and his spirit.

DDG is as good as ever but doesn't really have much say in tactics or formation.

Jones is perma injured and not used that much when he isn't.

Smalling has been good but again he has very little to do with our formation.

Carrick hasn't played that much as has been suspect for years. He has only ever performed vs rubbish opposition who sit off him and let him play at his own pace. I don't think any formation makes much difference to him. If anything he should be better in a possession system.

Young has been quite good even when pushed about the pitch and I don't think he has any problem doing whatever he is asked.

Valencia is just an awful footballer and wherever he plays he is just bad.
Been saying this about Carrick for years. He ain't no Pirlo!
Young ain't a united player, never was. I'd rather play a proper full back and Januzaj.
 
What do people mean by damaging the club he manages. What damage has been done to Chelsea/RM. Most of Chelsea's issues are due to players underperforming, not mourinho damaging the team. I watched them in the CL and they played well.

I think mourinho would have turned it around this season and the fans still loved him. Yes he is a grade A pillock but that doesn't damage the clubs he is at compared to the good he does in the way of trophies.

Eva to start with was completely Mourinho's fault, and yes that brought unwanted pressure on the club. I would also say the reputation has been hurt because of it.

He rarely manages kids very well, and Utd are well known for giving kids a chance ( even if the quality hasnt come through since 92, the chance is there if any do come along)

If Utd dont mind changing managers every 2-3 years then fair enough, but personally I would say thats a significant departure from recent policy - while LvG only signed for 3 years originally, there was rumours earlier in the season an extension was being discussed 18 months early. Moyes was also given a very long contract initally also ( and Giggs was always only interim).

The main problem with going the above route right now is that Utd REALLY NEED the top man to significantly change / improve the academy straight away as City especially have stolen a significant March on us in this regard recently and to attract the best British players especially this needs an urgent eye and Mourinho is not likely to do this so its only going to get worse, or stagnate.

I have no idea about LvG, but SAF was famously known for knowing everyone from the tea lady all the way up to the board and treating them like family - I would suggest that is not at all how Mourinho treated Eva in the slightest ( as he does appear to be a commited family man, what little of his family life appears in the general press).

Edit not convinced at all with Blind at centre back, its more fluke than judgement that until very recently our defence was rock solid ( and DDG being as good as he is most weeks). Left back he is a decent stand in for Shaw, cm/ Dm Hmmm okish

Much bigger squad issues than Young, ( even with the diving). Been a decent emergency left full back or winger and performed reasonably last season, although been ignored a lot this season.
 
Last edited:
What has Citys academy produced in recent years. They have these amazing facilities and what has is brought into their first team. United had given way way way more youngsters from their academy a chance over the past 5 years.

I don't think we need to change managers every 2-3 years but I don't know what people think is going to happen when we don't appoint top class managers. We will either have to stick with them for 5 years as they do sweet FA or we end up doing what we have done with LvG and Moyes. Appointing managers who are not up to scratch and who have to be pushed out of the door early because they are not good enough.

Personally I would rather we had mourinho for 2-3 years than someone like LvG again. I would be very happy to give a manager 2-3 years grace to build a team and get us playing great football, bringing youth through but hows that plan working out for us so far?

I think one of the biggest issues we have is that we haven't done anything since Fergie left. Our leaders and senior players have almost completely evaporated so there is no one who feels responsible for our failings. They can be blamed on the manager, the lack of Fergie, the board not buying. At the end of the day we need a manager who can bring us some trophies or at least get us playing with a bit of swagger and confidence. We have a good squad. Easily top 4 and with a few additions we should be competing for the title. At the rate we are going though we will drop into mid table by the end of the season.
 
City have only invested in the facilities in the past few years, it's going to take time, although with the money they have they don't need to take a chance with the youngsters.
 
I don't think we need to change managers every 2-3 years but I don't know what people think is going to happen when we don't appoint top class managers.

You thought he was a top class manager when you appointed him. If you thought that you can't really complain 18 months later as though you knew all along he was crap.
 
What has Citys academy produced in recent years. They have these amazing facilities and what has is brought into their first team. United had given way way way more youngsters from their academy a chance over the past 5 years..

you missed the point, I was talking about the academy that has just been opened with the Etihad complex in the last year, it has been reported that these facilities are amongst the best in Europe and the facilities for Utd' s youngsters are years out of date and Utd are struggling to attract the biggest talents.

If we wait much longer, it will be a year + in planning, a year + to build and come online (I seem to recall between first reading it in the press and it finally opening the Etihad project taking at least 18 months, albeit for a potentially larger site) - so we could easily be 3 years behind City if not more.
I don't think we need to change managers every 2-3 years but I don't know what people think is going to happen when we don't appoint top class managers. We will either have to stick with them for 5 years as they do sweet FA or we end up doing what we have done with LvG and Moyes. Appointing managers who are not up to scratch and who have to be pushed out of the door early because they are not good enough.

Personally I would rather we had mourinho for 2-3 years than someone like LvG again. I would be very happy to give a manager 2-3 years grace to build a team and get us playing great football, bringing youth through but hows that plan working out for us so far?.

Seemingly we haven't even thought about Pep until very recently - why not, at least talk to him (I mean before his announcement to leave BM). Or Simione from Atletico, or one of the top guys in Italy , but it doesn't even appear as though Utd speak to this level of manager (certainly nothing reported in the press about these people in regards to Utd)

I think one of the biggest issues we have is that we haven't done anything since Fergie left. Our leaders and senior players have almost completely evaporated so there is no one who feels responsible for our failings. They can be blamed on the manager, the lack of Fergie, the board not buying. At the end of the day we need a manager who can bring us some trophies or at least get us playing with a bit of swagger and confidence. We have a good squad. Easily top 4 and with a few additions we should be competing for the title. At the rate we are going though we will drop into mid table by the end of the season.

Don't disagree with this, but this to me at least depends on the manager first.
LvG attracted a few dutch players (from his previous position) which is usually how the first initial players come into a club, either through the manager knowing them from the national side or working with them at a previous club position, and then it builds from there.

Problem with that is Schweinsteiger may have been a brilliant player8-10 years ago when LvG was there, but while he is obviously trying for the EPL for the most part his legs are gone and is completely a different player (not his fault just a matter of age really and not that suited to the EPL. Mixed reports of how much the transfer fee was, but the astronomical wages could hamper Utd for a few years yet. The dutch players should be squad players, but they are getting 1st XI positions either totally out of position (Blind) or just not ready (Memphis) /consistent enough yet. We did well to get Martial last summer, but again he is young and not that consistent (unsurprisingly). But we have so few options its them or players even younger.

We cant complain about the board not backing LvG , its just going for the wrong targets / positions (why oh why did LvG think in the summer Blind was a reasonable centre back I will never know, not to mention Rojo who is a reasonable squad player at best, Memphis who plainly needs time to adapt and was not ready for this level of competition in the EPL. Just for starters.


Maybe we are just seeing the difference in quality between National and club sides (I wonder who would win between lets say Germany and Barcelona - Barcelona by a few I would suspect although Germany would get a decent amount of goals I suspect). Netherlands were a decent (if not entertaining) at the Worlds a couple of years ago, even if they failed to qualify for the Euros 2016. Not sure if this was management change issues, players not performing or a multitude of factors.
 
Holland were a bang average side that relied on a couple of players having blinders at the right time. Without RvP and Robben they wouldn't have got anywhere. You can argue that LvG took a side with huge limitations and got the best out of them or you can argue that he was just lucky. The more I see of him at United the more I feel it is the latter.
 
Rooney could be a big problem for United in the coming years, I'm fairly sure at this point that there is some sort of clause preventing him from being dropped no matter how bad he is, either that or he is just too valuable commercially not to be played (and pressure is coming from above the manager). It seems to me that he has become bigger than the club which SAF would never have allowed to happen.

I can't see how United can easily offload him with the wages he is on either, giving him a 4 year contract extension could well turn out to be Moyes' biggest mistake.
 
Last edited:
If that's true, not sure how I could look at myself in the mirror knowing how much I was brining the club down. I guess the £300k a week helps :(
 
I can't see how United can easily offload him with the wages he is on either, giving him a 4 year contract extension could well turn out to be Moyes' biggest mistake.

Any worse than Schweinsteiger being given a three year contract 18 months after ( for similar weekly wage, give or take a bit)?
 
Hopefully we'll offer Mourinho the job and also give him whatever he wants with regards to control over the squad, signings, etc.

I think he could last longer in a job if he doesn't have an interfering board/club owner above him, like at RM and Chelsea. We should at least put that to the test.

Sounds like LvG is considering resigning...
 
Hopefully we'll offer Mourinho the job and also give him whatever he wants with regards to control over the squad, signings, etc.

I think he could last longer in a job if he doesn't have an interfering board/club owner above him, like at RM and Chelsea. We should at least put that to the test.

I don't think there's any top tier clubs who actually let their manager choose and buy players any more.
What seems to be the norm now is that a manager meets with the 'transfer committee' and they discuss the type of player they think the squad needs, agree on a few players they think will fit then it's left up to the money people and agents to get the best they can for the best deal they can.
The days of a manager having sole control are long gone.
 
Back
Top Bottom