I'd like to say I've been enjoying it, but it has had the effect of making me feel just a tad thick at times. Trying to get my head around some of the theory has been very difficult. Between feedback compensation, phase shifts and poles my head pretty much fell off.God I love this. Exactly the sort of project I'd have loved to get my teeth into once upon a time.
Great stuff OP
I'd like to say I've been enjoying it, but it has had the effect of making me feel just a tad thick at times. Trying to get my head around some of the theory has been very difficult. Between feedback compensation, phase shifts and poles my head pretty much fell off.
Made some more progress over the weekend. Modelled the transformer using just the signal generator through a 4.7K load across the anode connections linking the HT centre taps together and an 8R load on the secondary. Connected one channel of the scope to the primary and the other channel to the secondary and measured the time difference between the primary and secondary.
Plotted the results on a graph
Got the constant current sink built on veroboard and fitted it to the main turret board.
Finished off all but the feedback section of the turret board today.
18W out of EL84's is pretty decent. They are usually only 10W in ultralinear, but that is with the small power losses attributed to using cathode biasing. Most guitar amps don't seem to bother with negative feedback and those that do, don't seem to use much. This has been the massive brain ache I've been dealing with. The original mullard design utilised 30dB of negative feedback which for a valve amp utilising global negative feedback is massive. Most didn't exceed 20dB.Makes me quite glad I build guitar amps not hi-fi! There are plenty of imperfections and inefficiencies and downright "bad design" in guitar amps. It's what makes them sound unique and sound good. That said, my 18W push-pull EL84 amp is finished and it's too, TOO loud. Already planning out a more self-designed amp using just small pentodes for lower volume
I certainly hope it'll satisfy once finished. It's certainly been a learning curve and far harder than I imagined it would be. At this stage, I feel I might have been better off just going to Audio Note and buying one of their kits, as it would have no doubt been easier but I'm starting to think, it may actually have been cheaper too.That's impressive. No idea what you're on about though! I always thought electronics looked interesting but aware it's a massive rabbit hole. Looks like you're learning a lot doing it, will be very satisfying when you finally get it completed. I'm just learning about basic construction, who knew there was so much to concrete Your project makes me feel mine is it actually quite easy, other than feeling like I've been run over every morning!
The build quality on the side of my bodgetastic chassis builds may be a tad questionable, but the electronic side of it should be to a high standard. I'm still working on a way to build a decent metal chassis. I've been working on it every now and then since starting the third build as it had sapped my enthusiasm.Impressive build and great execution. I love DIY audio, something about scratch building is daunting to me though especially valve gear. I'm sure the sound will be exquisite and can't wait to see the final form.
I'd like to say I've been enjoying it, but it has had the effect of making me feel just a tad thick at times. Trying to get my head around some of the theory has been very difficult. Between feedback compensation, phase shifts and poles my head pretty much fell off.
I'd like to say I've been enjoying it, but it has had the effect of making me feel just a tad thick at times. Trying to get my head around some of the theory has been very difficult. Between feedback compensation, phase shifts and poles my head pretty much fell off.
Professional looking chassis are the hardest thing to accomplish, I'm working on for my WHAMMY Headphone amp a case with polished aluminium, iroko wood and "forged" style carbon fibre plates that I have diy'd. with a dark greyish stain on the wood it should look nice if i can get it all together looking tight and nice fitting.... we will see though.
I have always chased that premium polished product, probably why I have failed so many times. I am smitten by the idea of a completely DIY thing, the pride that is involved in it and the satisfaction that, like most audiophiles, and anyone invested in a hobby that is an endless quest for your 'your right' finds themselves chasing. I have the likes of a galaxy dissapante case like modu pioneered but something doesn't hit that spot like a custome!I've found box enclosures do some decent looking enclosures as long as you get the right panel mount connectors, etc. and have a half decent setup to drill/cut the panels, etc.
I have always chased that premium polished product, probably why I have failed so many times. I am smitten by the idea of a completely DIY thing, the pride that is involved in it and the satisfaction that, like most audiophiles, and anyone invested in a hobby that is an endless quest for your 'your right' finds themselves chasing. I have the likes of a galaxy dissapante case like modu pioneered but something doesn't hit that spot like a custome!
CCS in this case meaning constant current source. The transistor is nothing special (2SC2611), CCS describes its purpose in this particular application. It's used in the cathodes of the phase splitter which sets the bias, due to its active nature, it also helps to balance both triodes in the valve. (so the push and pull halves are equal) The more traditional way of doing this is with a resistor but that is susceptible to drift as the voltage changes.Great project!
"ccs transistor" : ccs = ?? please.